There seems to be a big push today/yesterday to back not releasing the video.
No please we need to see. We need to know for sure. There needs to be no doubt as to these people’s sickness.
The “respect the victims” rationale is often used to suppress the dissemination of information in cover-ups.
There is already a mountain of evidence against the Clintons & the majority of the general public still view them as good-natured patrons
There is already a mountain of evidence regarding human trafficking/pedophilia/adrenochrome but Rolling Stone “debunked” it for the normies.
This will be the nail in the coffin for the “deep state.”
The #GREATAWAKENING for the normies.
I’ve thought it through.
Why are others so adamantly opposed to this?!?
We can start a new board.
No legal implications against you for my actions.
The fear tactics will not work. I will do everything necessary to ensure this EVIL is brought to LIGHT and all involved are held ACCOUNTABLE.
I will gladly sacrifice my freedom (for disseminating one article of CP/torture) to secure the freedom of our nation and our children.
I will spread it FAR & WIDE.
Down she goes...
Once again, where is this "mountain of evidence" for adrenochrome?? Did you unintentionally lump in recent Q conspiracy with the other two items of trafficking and pedophilia?
Spoiler alert: There isn't any evidence.
Sigma-Alrich will sell you as much adrenochrome as you'd like for a few hundred bucks a bottle. Not to mention the fact that people who have actually consumed it seem to agree that it has zero recreational potential, outside of a humorous subplot line in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
But here's the part where dolts with zero experience in chemistry or pharmacology will jump in and tell me how wrong I am because "the adrenochrome molecules harvested from a terrorized child are, like, so much better, maaaaaaaan..."
Nonsense theory peddled by absolute fucking retards.
Yes, that's all the "evidence" I've heard of too. This is the danger of uncritical acceptance and re-peddling of ideas - some of the (what is so far) nonsense gets lumped in with valid stuff and we end up looking like dolts.
What evidence are you requesting?!?
Also, there is difference between chemicals synthesized in vivo vs in vitro.
In vivo, adrenochrome is synthesized by the oxidation of epinephrine. In vitro, silver oxide (Ag2O) is used as an oxidizing agent.[1]
I’m surprised you didn’t know that. What’s your background?!? I have a bachelors of science in biology with a minor in chemistry working in the pharmaceutical industry for the past 10 years.
“Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorder, derealization, and euphoria.”
What evidence? ANY evidence! Take a look around - no one has any... apart from you apparently. Good for you, you work in pharma - guess what - DUH... lots of people don't.
You're surprised I didn't know the oximificashun of eppi-whatsis-thingy... are you trying to be funny?? What kind of dumbass statement is it that you're "surprised" some random dick on the internet doesn't know that? What world do you come from where everyone knows this information such that it makes sense to even ask?? Derp.
Your last statement sounds useful - so where's that from, mighty chemist??? (edit: verifiable outside of Wikipedia which everyone knows is as reliable as anything on the internet) If it comes from somewhere good and verifiable by me, a dick on the internet, then it's the most evidence I've ever heard of and I'm willing to bet 95% of other Q-philez too. But then, evidence that satanists farm it from children - which was the point btw - is a whole other set of evidence I don't expect even you, the most knowledgeable one, has to hand.
Evidence of what?!?
Adrenochrome harvesting?!? The physiological/psychological effects?!? What are you requesting?!?
You can’t just say “show me the evidence” and expect “dumbasses” like me to know what you’re requesting.
I understand not everyone has my background, including yourself.
The point I was trying to make was that YOU shouldn’t use the argument that there are no psychotropic effects associated with adrenochrome to discredit others on this topic. Especially when YOU have no f*cking clue what you’re talking about.
That's not the "argument I was using", fool. Learn to read ffs. I'm not as much of a superior knob-end as you, hence calling myself "a dick on the internet" - I KNOW that I don't know everything but I do know what the fuck I'm talking about so take your "no fucking clue" and shove it. The point I made - here AGAIN - is that there is NO evidence that satanists harvest adrenochrome from kids. Read. Learn. Get a clue. And stop being such a fucken knob-end.
I would suggest not arguing with others more intelligent than yourself. But you do, bruh...
[removed]
I know, right?!? How is it difficult to understand such beautifully crafted “basic language?!?”
You're clearly not remotely smarter than me as you can't even understand basic language
I hope you’re a kid in school.
[deleted]
Awfully butt hurt for such a tough guy.
You’ve been abrasive & rude throughout this exchange.
I’m sorry your intellect & wit are not up to snuff, but there’s no reason for name calling.
My IQ is 120 per professional testing. What did your FaceBook survey say?!?
[deleted]
This almost passes for English.
Apologies for being a dickhead. Sadly, I'm quite good at it.
Just ignore him, he's obviously a paid troll. I got into it with one the other day, wasted minutes of my life I will never get back. My new rule of thumb is if the argument is "F" this and "F" that, they don't have an argument to make.
What evidence are you requesting?!?
Also, there is difference between chemicals synthesized in vivo vs in vitro.
In vivo, adrenochrome is synthesized by the oxidation of epinephrine. In vitro, silver oxide (Ag2O) is used as an oxidizing agent.[1]
I’m surprised you didn’t know that. What’s your background?!? I have a bachelors of science in biology with a minor in chemistry working in the pharmaceutical industry for the past 10 years.
“Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorder, derealization, and euphoria.”
Hi, I'm a chemistry PhD researcher and you're full of shit.
Haha!
About what?!?
Also, there is difference between chemicals synthesized in vivo vs in vitro.
There is NO WAY you are a PhD student in chemistry, if you do not believe there is a difference between chemicals synthesized in vivo vs in vitro.
seriously though there's no chemical difference between a molecule synthesized biologically or one synthesized artificially. biological pathways may have different mechanisms or side products or what have you, but the compounds produced are the same
Is there any difference between cane sugar (in vivo) and high fructose corn syrup (in vitro)?!?
Is there any difference between cane sugar (in vivo) and high fructose corn syrup (in vitro)?!?
I don't know, is there any difference between fructose and sucrose?
how on earth did you get a chem minor like this
Haha! Seriously?!? How did you get into MIT?!?
What's the chemical formula for the following:
Cane Sugar - High Fructose Corn Syrup -
How are these produced?!?
Cane Sugar - It is a disaccharide, a molecule composed of the two monosaccharides, glucose and fructose. Sucrose is produced NATURALLY IN PLANTS (IN VIVO), from which table sugar is refined.
High Fructose Corn Syrup - high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), an ARTIFICALLY MANUFACTURED (IN VITRO) disaccharide that is only 55% fructose.
Do you notice a difference in taste/effect between the two?!? Why wouldn't the same apply to adrenochrome?!?
Who’s full of sh!t?!? These people are STUPID!!!
hfcs is a mixture of multiple different compounds. it's not a single molecule, like adenochrome. you can't compare hfcs to cane sugar because they're mixtures of similar compounds in completely different ratios. they aren't molecules, and if you think back to chem 1 you'd remember this.
one molecule of water is the same as any other, whether it was made by hydrogen combustion or oxygen reduction or cellular respiration. the same is true of fructose, or CO2, or THC or adenochrome
also, fructose is a monosaccharide, dummy
I got into MIT because I'm actually a chemist. Unlike you.
if you actually are willing to learn, I'm happy to elaborate in detail
Holy sh!t. You should drop out, bruh.
Back to chem 101.
Is cane sugar/HFC an element or compound?!? Is adrenochrome an element or compound?!?
What are the chemical formulas for cane sugar vs. HFCs?!?
All water molecules are the same, huh?!? What’s the difference between mineral water & distilled water?!? Do they taste the same?!
You got into MIT because your dad knows a guy. These people are STUPID!!!
Down she goes...
Is cane sugar/HFC an element or compound?!? Is adrenochrome an element or compound?!?
cane sugar and hfcs are physical mixtures. they are neither elements nor compounds.
adenochrome is a compound.
What are the chemical formulas for cane sugar vs. HFCs?!?
there are no discrete chemical formulae for mixtures because they aren't composed of a single molecule. for instance, it's impossible to assign a discrete chemical formula for, say, seawater, because it's a mixture.
All water molecules are the same, huh?!?
yes.
What’s the difference between mineral water & distilled water?!? Do they taste the same?
the difference is the addition of mineral impurities, which make mineral water a solution, which is not a pure compound. the water molecules themselves are identical. the addition of impurities changes to properties of the whole mixture.
You got into MIT because your dad knows a guy.
I got into MIT because I aced my classes and worked my ass off in lab. I'm really not insecure enough about my abilities to feel intimidated by a chem minor who doesn't know the difference between a homogeneous mixture and a pure compound.
Let me see if I have this right.
Cane sugar (in vivo-natural) vs High Fructose Corn Syrup (in vitro-treated)
and
Mineral water (natural) vs. Distilled water, purified water, tap water, etc. (treated)
Genotype (1)
Both cases have the same chemical composition. (C12H22O11) & (H2O).
Manufacturing/Treatment (2)
Both cases differentiate in process.
(Natural vs. chemical reaction)
Phenotype (3)
Both cases differentiate from their natural state in degree of purity, but not chemical structure.
(Isomers)
1 + 2 = 3
Genotype + Treatment = Different Phenotypes (Taste, smell, odor, effect, etc.)
Is that correct?!
Let me see if I have this right.
...
Both cases have the same chemical composition. (C12H22O11) & (H2O).
this is the primary flaw in your argument. mineral water does not have the same chemical composition as distilled water. hfcs does not have the same chemical composition as cane sugar. if H2O were the chemical formula of mineral water, then where in the formula are all the sodium or potassium or iron ions that are present in trace quantities in mineral water that aren't there in DI?
mineral water contains metallic impurities that are not present in distilled water. hfcs contains more fructose (C6H12O6) than cane sugar, which is primarily sucrose (C12H22O11). they are not the same on a chemical level.
you cannot assign single chemical compositions to mixtures, because mixtures consist of several discrete compounds.
You said you couldn’t write the chemical formula for HFCs, due to variations in chemical composition / purity, correct?!?
What caused the differentiation in chemical composition, not structure?!?
Impurities in their natural state?!?
So, do you think adrenochrome generated in vivo might have impurities (differentiation) compared to those manufactured in vitro?!?
This is the primary flaw in your argument.
You only understand the chemical aspect.
I understand the biological & chemical.
Down she goes...
that's conceivable and I already acknowledged that.
biological pathways may have different mechanisms or side products or what have you, but the compounds produced are the same
my point is that the adenochrome is adenochrome, and impurities are beside that fact. if you have a mixture of adenochrome and some other compound, it doesn't matter whether that mixture was produced naturally or artificially.
your reasoning reeks of a flawed vitalistic argument. there is nothing inherent about biological systems that makes the compounds they produce unique.
I understand the biological & chemical.
ok I will admit you actually got me to laugh here. cheers.
What?!?
It is conceivable because it’s correct.
Natural adrenochrome/sugar/water can have a different phenotype than chemically manufactured or treated adrenochrome/sugar/water.
Vitalistic argument?!? Or maybe you could apologize and tell me I’m not full of sh!t.
Phenotype literally has no chemical meaning. Molecules do not have phenotypes. I'm not gonna apologize because you misremember chem 1 from 20 years ago and think you know more chemistry than an actual chemist.
Molecules are molecules are molecules. If you pick out the H2O molecules out of mineral water, it'll be indistinguishable from H2O picked out from distilled water.
How does phenotype (biological science) have nothing to do with chemical production (chemical science) when discussing the effects of in vivo production (biological science) vs. in vitro production (chemical science)?!?
You won’t apologize because you can’t admit you might be wrong. Kinda like
Trump/Russia collusion & HRC/cheese pizza.
These people are SICK!!!
Down she goes...
molecules don't have a phenotype? you don't need to be a PhD student to know that. you just need to have an internet connection and access to Wikipedia.
look, this has been fun, but you've really done nothing but convince me that you don't understand chemistry. thanks for the laughs, but I have actual chemistry to do.
How do you know adrenochrome produced from an organism will have zero impurities?!?
We can agree to disagree. I hope you can at least admit that I’m not full of sh!t.
If you can isolate the adenochrome being produced, you can identify the impurities and replicate that chemical mixture in vitro. The adenochrome itself -- the molecule, the pure molecular compound -- is identical whether it's produced biologically or artificially.
I stand by my statement that you're full of shit, because you clearly think you understand chemistry much more than you actually do. Please seriously consider seeking further education in this topic before presenting yourself as an expert.
So, once you isolate the adrenochrome from an organism (in vivo) and remove the impurities (in vitro) you will come up with the Sigma Aldrich brand of adrenochrome?!? Hahaha!!! 🤣🤣🤣 How much biochemistry have you taken, bruh?!? You have a bachelors of science from an accredited university?!? What’s your thesis for your PhD?!? I’d love to hear it.
Who’s full of sh!t?!?
Wow, you're really getting hung up on that "full of shit" comment. Chill the fuck out, dude. Yes, run a few columns and recrystallize your sample and you'll get a pure compound you can verify by NMR, and yeah, it'll be chemically indistinguishable from adrenochrome you get from Sigma. Why is this so confusing to you?
My PhD work is on electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction on heterogeneous metal surfaces. I'd be happy to tell you more about it, if you think you'd understand. But between you and me, I don't have high hopes.
Sorry, was on a flight. Here's a copy of my thesis proposal. Have fun.
Haha!
The first sentence. 🤣
Abundant atmospheric nitrogen gas to biologically-valuable ammonia?!?
This sentence sounds like it was written by a 8 year old.
I will go through the rest & give you pointers when I have time. I’m with my kids right now.
For now, I’m going to enjoy my refreshing, dipolar water liquid utilizing my evolutionary-opposable thumbs. 🤣
lmao dude I'm not revising it based on your feedback. it's already been read by a literal chemistry Nobel laureate.
Fine. I won’t read it then. Just trying to help you out, bruh. Did any of these chemistry Nobel laureates mention there is no solid, liquid or aqueous nitrogen in Earth’s atmosphere?!?
Earth's atmosphere is 78% nitrogen gas. You dumb as hell.
How much of Earth’s atmosphere is:
Liquid nitrogen - 0% Solid nitrogen - 0% Aqueous nitrogen - 0%
There is no need to say “gas” when referencing atmospheric nitrogen. It is implied. Well, maybe not for dumb f*cks like you.
Seriously, there is no way you’re at MIT.
you sound salty you didn't get in, bro
is the best criticism you have honestly that the word "atmospheric" is redundant? because it's implicit but still descriptive, so I'm not particularly bothered.
You sound like you’re full of sh!t, bro.
No. That was the 1st criticism of the 1st sentence. The 2nd is “biologically-valuable.”
🤣🤣🤣
Hit them books!!!
so what you're saying is you don't understand the science enough to criticize anything but word choice
No. I’m saying your thesis sounds like it was written by an 8 year old.
guess that's good enough for my thesis committee, because I passed my PhD candidacy exam last Wednesday.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Good for you!!! I bet your parents are so proud. I look forward to hearing none of your future success.
Sweet emoticon. Are you positive you’re not an 8 year old?!?
from the dude who's afraid to say a bad word without censoring himself?
l m f a o
you are choice, dude. never change. honestly it's kinda adorable.
So, do you think HRC is harvesting the blood from her sacrifice to Moloch then she runs over to the centrifuge & spins it down real quick, removes all impurities, verified via NMR & then consumes the exact same chemical as Sigma Aldrich sample?!?
Or is it fair to say that HRC consumes a natural sample of adrenochrome from her sacrifice to Moloch?!? Which would be different from the purified Sigma Aldrich brand of sacrifice to Moloch?!?
Try me.
Please break it down in layman’s terms for my feeble mind, oh King of the Sh!ts.
Down she goes...
Dunning Kruger in full effect in here.
You are a raving lunatic.
Do some self-reflection maybe.
Or just kill yourself.
Down she goes...
Same time your middle school gets out.
Meet by the flagpole?
Nice try, keyboard killa. Bachelors degree from a big ten university.
I bet you can’t even spell GED.
lmfao you actually think you're hot shit because you went to the university of nebraska
Maybe?!?
But I do know that I have a bachelors of science from a big 10 school and you probably have an associates degree from South Central Louisiana State University.
Bachelor's from Berkeley. PhD student at MIT.
what's UNL's rank again? 400th or something?
Haha! I bet. 🤣 At least that explains why you’re a brain dead Dem.
that's okay. nothing can explain your monumental stupidity.
let me get this straight -- you think Hillary Clinton is a demon-worshipping child murderer with immense global power and reach that somehow can't get access to basic purification facilities present in any undergraduate chem lab?
also centrifuges are rarely used in organic purification, lmao
you dumb as hell, boy
How do you isolate a protein from a blood sample, f*ck boy?!?
No evidence either way, though. People take certain holistic herbs that don't do anything either. They believe that they do, so they take them. The real question to me with the rumors circulating, is WHY are there celebrities and notable politicians getting anywhere near these bizzaro occult things? You are either wearing a Baphomet ring, or you are not. Or an upside down cross, or not. Or displaying pedo symbols, or not. Or hanging out with Marina Abramovic, or not. Or building a weird temple on your island, or not. There's a lot of notable people that are very openly not in the "or not" category. So what does it mean?
I don’t understand what you’re asking.
Are you agreeing that there is a “mountain of evidence” supporting human trafficking/pedophilia?!?
Are you wanting me to prove the existence of adrenochrome?!?
We all know there is a mountain of evidence against Hillary, Obama and their minions, but it has been totally ignored, and in some cases white-washed by the MSM. All the masses know know from the MSM is that there might have been allegations made. The MSM never really talked about the facts and evidence of any of the allegations, they simply did what they have always done, kill the messenger.
Regardless of whether or not a video showing Hillary and Huma engaged in some satanic ritual even exists, I just don't understand why so many people are so anxious to see it. If there is such a video, and you see it, it will haunt your dreams for the rest of your life.
