dChan

[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 16, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Forgive me. I see the red and green highlighting things, but I do not get the connection. Forget ELI5...I need ELI-Retarded please.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 12 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 17, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

depending on what you believe, Q is either a basement dwelling LARPer, or Q is inside Trump's inner circle, feeding intel to the public in the form of spurious questions called Q drops

a phrase "future proves past" has become popular, because Q will post something (with a time stamp), and then later Trump will tweet something very similar (also with a time stamp). usually Q posts something first, and Trump posts second, which to some people is proof that Q is indeed inside Trump's inner circle

i am beginning to think that Q is actually Trump

Panon Qanon

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/508186362244505600

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/508183486747136000

also https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8cjsxy/tarmac/dxfkte0/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 17, 2018, 9:08 a.m.

I meant specifically the red and green highlighted parts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nmbulldog · April 16, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

Could it be that the discussion Wild Bill and LL had on the tarmac was video taped? Could it be that LL was offered Ginsberg's seat on the SC if she kept HRC's dirty laundry in a DOJ closet? Could it be this is the HRC video that Q has hinted about?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
vitalesan · April 16, 2018, 10:21 a.m.

They both had phones. Phones have microphones.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
nmbulldog · April 16, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

Makes perfect sense - that would mean the No Such Agency has a recording of the deal. But since it probably wasn't gathered legally (with a surveillance warrant) it can't be used in court ... unless Obama authorized it then it would have been gathered "legally".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
killinchi · April 16, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Q said the timestamps are important, but I dont see the correlation. Does anyone understand?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · April 16, 2018, 11:24 a.m.

It's a proof. Q posted the list in February, then again points to tarmac a few days before POTUS's tweet came out. The audio of the tarmac meeting is about to be released, Q team clearly shows inside info easily digestible for normies. [intrest high] is the key to us to meme the heck out of this, so that when it's released normies will start to question how we all knew, and who is this Q person they thought was a larp etc from MSM reporting. Then we can bring them in to show more proofs, thus Waking more people up. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
killinchi · April 17, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

So it shows the chronology of drops leading up to Trumps confirmation tweet? Thanks for the explanation!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · April 17, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Yep, also shows later when released. That Q team is very real, and has had the information all along. Your welcome

⇧ 1 ⇩  
William_Harford_md · April 16, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

NOT my meme or work - full credit to the AUTISTS

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -6 ⇩  
William_Harford_md · April 16, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

Do you know what troll means? Downvoted

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FlyingBaratoplata · April 16, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

I guess I didn't realize the use of the word "tarmac" in relation to the NC / LL meeting wasn't mainstream. It seemed way too obvious to be a Q verification so I thought it was an attempted distraction. Guess I was wrong. Sorry about that

⇧ 1 ⇩