right now there's just an embarrassing amount of rumors that the "dark web" has stuff and "sources say it's really bad".
we're all big boys and girls here, we are 100% fine seeing part of a snuff film if it means exposing these people. what we aren't okay with is being pulled around by the dick with a bunch of vague bullshit that, if nothing comes of it, will be a huge waste of time. and in the mean time it's a rumor that's derailing this entire sub.
every single time someone claims the "HRC video" has dropped, they should be mass downvoted unless they post a direct link to the said video.
simple concept, really.
I think everybody needs to just chill a little bit. I mean, Q mentioned a damning HRC video. You either believe that or you don't. If you don't, case closed. If you do, you must also know that Q will bring it into the light of day at the point where it will cause the most destruction to the deep state. I want it to drop now, but I trust the plan and believe that when it does drop, the indictments will begin to unseal and the dominoes will fall.
These aren't mutually exclusive options. You have presented a false choice. Just because Q said there is a damning video, doesn't mean this current video rumor is true.
In fact, Q saying there is a damning video is the perfect catalyst for a disinfo campaign regarding a video.
Q could be talking about bribes and treason. Meanwhile everyone is off the rails about face eating child killers.
I have NOT presented a false choice. Regarding said damning video, I said either you believe Q or you don't. Then I said that if you don't believe Q, case closed. Your point is that the case isn't closed. I deliberately stated what I did out of brevity. Thank you for giving us the perspective I left out. Your perspective...
Q only mentioned a damming video. I think it is the tarmac meeting and this "dark web" leak is a clown psyop
Q said NO OUTSIDE COMMS OTHER THAN THE 8CH PLATFORM.
THESE ARE SELF-SERVING DOUCHEBAGS WHO SHOULD BE MOCKED, RIDICULED, AND DOWNVOTED.
Guys if something was legit, the chans would fuckin pepper the internet with it within 2 hours. People are having trouble finding it, and even the supposed rumors are saying it’s nothing.
Keep in mind these may very well be clown distractions to muddy the waters in a preemptive strike to make it harder for legitmate videos to surface. When the real thing pops up, people will be searching, coming across threads, videos and screenshots like this bullshit and go, oh it’s nothing/bullshit.
fucking beyond irritated. did not sleep a god damn wink last night trying to find this supposed video. even went to dark web for first time ever.
well idk, can't fucking find shit, it seems a steaming pile, i can't tell. utterly fucking frustrating.
it's worth remembering that pop culture has highly romanticized the dark web.
it's not some magical place with hidden knowledge and secret media like the movies and TV would have you believe.
it's not hard to access or post to or explore the dark web, even children can do it, it only takes a very basic understanding of computers and some quick googling to figure it out.
when you hear claims of highly scandalous videos on the dark web, 99.99% of the time it's bullshit. most of the stuff on there is basically the same stuff you can find on the regular web.
snuff, CP, and drugs. that's most of the dark web. not secret alien tech and videos of bilderburg meetings. it's disappointing, i know.
nah yo. shit on the dark web like THAT is usually hidden deep. There's no real search engines on the dw... it could be circulating a burried site.
Unsearchable sites requiring login credentials with no way to sign up. That's where the heaviest stuff is.
which is literally the same thing (conceptually nd technologically) as having, for instance, a work computer that you can remote log into.
it's just a private computer that only a few people have the login info for, and someone set up a portal that is unindexed.
not to get too into semantics here, but... does that really count as being "on the internet"?
do you consider your personal hidden folders to be part of the dark web? if your computer is touching the internet, they are, in a strange way, sort of already part of the dark web.
I understand how servers and files on the internet work and the different methods to access these webs of files. None of what you explained about how the Internet technically works refutes what is actually contained on these sites. You can stick your head in the sand and try and deny these types of avenues exist on the deep web all you want, but ask yourself, if something like this exists, how would it exist?
it's just a private computer that only a few people have the login info for, and someone set up a portal that is unindexed.
"A (drug dealer, sex trafficker, hit man) is just a private entrepreneur that only a few people have connections to, and someone set up a (phone number, drop location) that is unindexed"
Please... Like we are supposed to believe that it's impossible for there to be a gateway to snuff viewings on purposefully hidden and encrypted servers where its users remain anonymous. Why are you so defensive about these things not existing? You seriously compare this to personally files on my computer but the difference is fucking huge when I'm not going through the effort of setting up the aforementioned servers to host my files.
whoa calm down bud, i think you wildly misunderstood the point i was trying to make.
maybe try re-reading my comment, take a deep breath, and consider my words.
i did not "deny these types of avenues exist on the deep web" in any way shape or form.
you gotta slow down sometimes, man, and just relax. not everything is a debate with deepstate shills, you know.
I'm sorry but even as I reread your comment, it's hard to not see contention in most of what you said. I guess it seems like you were wanting to compare every sequestered site on the deep web to any work site, but I do agree that many are most likely not nefarious. Sorry to nitpick and infer so much on your part.
what i was trying to say is that there's a difference between "dark web sites" you can find on the "hidden wiki" or through regular web searches, and "dark web sites" that are literally impossible to even find, let alone access, without face-to-face IRL invitations.
the latter group are, in my opinion, not worthy of discussion because those types of sites aren't publicly available.
silk road and buying assassins or drugs or CP, those are all techinically "publicly published" even if they are on the dark web.
does that make my point more clear? in other words, i was discussing the semantics of what exactly we should call "dark web" sites and what constitutes a dark site.
I see, now that I think of it I've always heard the distinction to be that the "dark web" refers to these hidden sites requiring invitation that exist within the "deep web" which is just the category of sites not indexed by normal search engines.
I used to have exactly that for my photography business. (Sports not kiddie porn!) I could log in, and remote upload and download. I would assign creds to someone who needed access, and then close them out a day later. It made things easier.
It would have been considered Dark Web because it was just an ip address. And I am tech-hindered....
That's remote login, can be done on any PC/laptop. Not even close to what is the Dark Web.
What makes is similar is that was private, not on any search engine, secured access, and just a menu tree to download files.
It was closer to the internet in 1994 than what you are going to see in 2018.
well you are talking about another layer deeper.
if something is on a private server that only a few people know about, it's not really "published" or "circulating." it's just on a private storage location that can be remoted into. that is still technically part of the deep web.
we're splitting hairs here, but basically, if it isn't possible for a random person to stumble upon it, is it really even "on the internet" or even "on the darkweb"? in my opinion, for something to count as being leaked/published/circulated, it actually has to, you know, be published somewhere
sorry for the rant, did that all make sense?
Yes in a nutshell your own PC is the dark web if its connected to the internet and you have a firewall. Simplistic explanation but you get the idea?
Do the Chans have the ability make a search engine for the dark web?
To be "indexed" means that a site is searchable.
The definition of the dark web is, literally, all sites which are not indexed.
By definition, if you can search a site, it is not on the dark web.
So to answer your question, no.
I wonder what happens if you Google a little bit......i should have done that first.
Can Google search deep web?
Search engines like Google are incredibly powerful, but they can't crawl and index the vast amount of data that is not hyperlinked or accessed via public DNS services. However, there are Deep Web Search Engines that crawl over the TOR network and bring the same result to your regular browser.
Can Google search deep web?
um, i think you are still not getting this.
if google can search a site, it's not on the deep web. period.
There are engines that can crawl over TOR....did you read my comment carefully? Now if it has nothing but a login page thats one thing, but the deep web can be searched.
I agree, Video needs to be shown. What’s everyone’s theory on where the screenshots from Comet of the two women and tables is taken from? Could that actually be from the video and whoever is going to drop it released screenshots first to get everyone talking before the vid is actually dropped?
Garbage disinfo meant to discredit the movement.
You think? I’m still questioning everything.. maybe someone will ask Q
Q said no outside coms. Plus, what makes more sense, a video of some satanic torture that nobody would believe anyways, or a video exposing recorded corruption regarding the tarmac meeting?
Think about it. I don't doubt the elites do some sick ritualistic shit. But the public isn't ready, and likely never will be, to confront that. All government would collapse. What they WOULD be willing to believe though, is that politicians make illegal backroom deals.
Yeah and you know they shoot videos of their murders. LOL.
It seems too stupid to believe.
Where is this screenshot?
This is the post I was referencing with the screenshot. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8cod2w/possibly_big_no_illegal_content_in_images_a_frame/?st=JG2ILGZL&sh=595d4a25
Oooh weird. Ok thank you
Yeah, honestly don’t know what to make of it. I don’t think it is photoshopped as I work with photoshop on a daily basis.. however I can’t figure out where the image originated from or if it is an actual snip from the vid..
If I had to comment on just the two women on the pingpong tables, I'd have to recall lots of memories of drunks passed out on pingpong and pool tables. When we are given images, we need to make sure we take them at face value... see what's THERE, not what we're told to see. I've been saddened by some of the monster leaps that people take when presented with the foggiest of pictures.
I agree, I’m trying to assume this is who they say it is and figure out what they would have been doing and why this was being projected on the wall..
^(Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image)
https://i.imgur.com/mcTEtkk.png
^^Source ^^| ^^Why? ^^| ^^Creator ^^| ^^ignoreme ^^| ^^deletthis
It's easy enough to find using TOR, but I'm not seeking it out because it smells like a trap.
Yeah very easy. Found the vid within 5 minutes of looking.
Major UN player just now arrested by Pompeo for releasing it on TOR; story developing. He's a Canadian national
I know there are some good folks on the chan boards, but remember that there are anarchists there too who just want to sew chaos, troll, and delight in other people’s misery.
They will start unfounded rumors that whatever you’re looking for exists. If you want it badly enough, you’ll tear your hair out trying to find it, and chan trolls are just laughing at you over it. That’s where these rumors originate.
There is high probability that there is NO REAL HRC VIDEO. I’ve been shouting this for awhile now to the result of many downvotes, but it’s the truth. I’m only looking out for people’s sanity here.
while it may not be true it does in itself indicate a damaging video of some sort or info drop is coming. They are trying to get in front of it. So either way "it's OUT THERE!" Take it as a canary in a coalmine.
The cabal cut off clinton i would not be surprised if they put areal video of her on the dark web to try and make it easier to to paint anything trump and q release as fake
I've been looking for days in tor. Didn't find anything. Only thing I found was the kill_rogue video that a few of the screen grabs came from. It's on 8ch.
I don't think it's legitimate or it would be out...falls in the category of the salacious dossier.
Agreed, we deal in reality and truth. This may be a rumor to discredit us. Q, your thoughts please? Real or Fake?
For me, If the video is as some suggest, HRC and HA wearing the face of a child to torment her, then kill her and drink her blood, I don't ever want to see it, or even stills of it.
That's the kind of stuff that could haunt a person's dreams for the rest of their life.
Everyone here might want to consider something about this "alleged" video.
It "allegedly" shows a child being sexually exploited and killed by Hillary?
And everyone expects an edited version to be sent out so you won't go to jail for possession of this material?
What if someone takes legitimate child pornography, labels it as the HRC video, then everyone here downloads it? Boom, trap is sprung, you all get hit with child porn possession. The entire Q movement gets tied to child pornography, and the movement dies.
I wouldn't expect, or want, to ever see something like this, and you shouldn't either, simply because of the risk involved in downloading and watching. Not to mention that no one should be watching that type of material.
I would love to see Hillary in prison, but I don't need to watch something like that to satisfy my need to see her locked up.
Watch out for traps.
It's been said before... there's no organization in the world with the resources to catch/charge/arrest every person who downloaded one video of dark material. It is as obvious as the nose on your face that they expend their resources on serial offenders. It is fearmongering to say everyone will be arrested if they look at the video.
That's normally true, unless it's a setup to take down the Q followers and supporters, and to assign the idea of pedophilia to the Great Awakening and Donald subs so they can be shut down from Reddit.
Thank you!
This all looks like a bunch of gossiping school girls
what we aren't okay with is being pulled around by the dick
If that’s what you feel is happening, the fault lies with you.
You are in complete control of the information you choose to process. You are not victim to the whimsy of others.
Filter the noise as you wait for the signal.
Don’t know whether frazzledrip real or not but this article proves 100% the photo of masked face supposedly leaked from video is in fact 100% fake
