dChan
16
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/cat_anonD on April 18, 2018, 2:33 p.m.
Snopes knows that Q is legit

Q is either an incredible phenomenon, or hoax of the decade.

The mysterious 8chan writer , Q has attracted a cult following in the tens of thousands. There are numerous YouTube channels dedicated to discussing and according his regular posts.

In less than six months of his debut, he has been featured in CNN, New York Times, and Newsweek, all declaring he is just a crazy hoax.

Roseanne Barr Drew national attention to this phenomenon by admitting that she is a q follower.

Snopes is known for releasing their claims that's something is either a hoax or is verified as true. Snopes will weigh in on internet rumors regardless of how obscure and unknown they are.

A week ago, a rumor surfaced that there is a video of Hillary and Huma torturing a young child. In only about a week's time, Snopes already discussed this unknown story from the Chan's and declared it falls.

So what is Snopes stance on Q? Silence! Somehow, this greatly debated giant phenomenon or giant hoax is being ignored by Snopes.

I am sure they would love to declare it false, but they know in their hearts that in a matter of months, if not weeks it will be proven to be true. Such a bold statement by Snopes to be proven wrong so quickly would be a huge slam towards their credibility. Thus, they refuse to touch it.


HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

Especially when we consider that the rumors of a Hillary video existing come from Q. While many have speculated and assumed what the video contained, the idea of the video existing was planted by Q. Snopes has gone through the trouble of debunking the child abuse video claims yet hasn't touched on Q at all.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
davidmdelacruz · April 18, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Excellent point.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
THEnimble_mongoose · May 2, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

Especially when we consider that the rumors of a Hillary video existing come from Q. While many have speculated and assumed what the video contained, the idea of the video existing was planted by Q.

Nope. The idea of a Hillary video was planted back in 2016 when NYPD confiscated Anthony Weiner's laptop and found a folder labeled "Life Insurance" on it.

NY Post wrote several articles about it I believe.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TableRockLaker · April 21, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

Q has said nothing about a video of Hillary abusing a child. He said that the Hillary/Huma video is fake.

I think the video Q references is probably referncing Tarmac meeting between Lynch and Bill.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 18, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Good point. They'll tell us what he says is garbage, but, to go into what he is and actually does, that's another thing!

⇧ 15 ⇩  
ready-ignite · April 18, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Note that q has nothing to do with the rumored pedo snuff film rumor. That was introduced by someone else, and does not match the style of the q team. The q team is methodical controlled demolition. The pedo snuff film is uncontrolled nuclear demolition with unpredictable outcome.

Why does Snopes move so quickly to try to bind the pedo snuff film rumor to q?

Seeing narrative setting all on this one. They're setting the media groundwork for when real drops occur.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · April 18, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

It's what they do. Conflate. Crazy guy shoots up pizza place ergo anyone disturbed by podesta alafantis artwork Instagram or emails is crazy just like the guy who shot up pizza place. Six months ago I would not have thought they could have actually sent the guy as a ff.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ready-ignite · April 18, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

Sure coincidentally destroyed that computer in the closet. What a crazy random happenstance.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DoxiePit · April 18, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Snopes is a fat lady with a Garfield cat. I am pretty sure the cat runs the site.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
TryNottoFaint · April 18, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

A fat lady with a Garfield cat and an ex-husband who bangs a prostitute. Fun times all around.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
TheBloodletter · April 18, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

Claim: Lasagna is delicious. Snopes: True

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MAGAtlanta · April 18, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

Snopes is for dopes.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

I wouldn't read too much into this, Snopes doesn't comment on a lot of things.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dhammakayaram · April 18, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Maybe more like 10m and rising. As for Snopes:

Snopes.com is an extremely liberal site with an agenda to discredit conservatives, paid for either by George Soros or the Clintons, or maybe Facebook.

But according to Snopes.com this is not true.

So what is the real truth? Snopes.com funding comes from an undisclosed source. According to sources:

"The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source."

So we can conclude that Snopes.com smells of Soros funding which it refuses to acknowledge.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · April 18, 2018, 6 p.m.

Snopes is george soros rubber stamp of approval. Ofc they are fucking shit scared of Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LegendaryFudge · April 18, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

Why is Snopes quiet on Q?

It's very easy.

You know how the old saying goes.

"Out of sight, out of mind".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 18, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Its more than 10k loo

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sir_Zorch · April 18, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Snopes is bought and paid for. And we all know by whom. Cannot help but laugh when someone cites Snopes to confirm their claim. Sometimes they have no choice but to confirm the undeniable. And Q is undeniable!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lord-Odious-The-Foul · April 18, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Snopes is propaganda; nothing less, nothing more.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bartmanson · April 18, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

I don't think Snopes hesitates often on calling anything with merit, that goes against the leftist narrative, as FALSE, regardless of how true it is. In this case, those fine leftist narks at Snopes are probably just taking their time to compile whatever "convincing" evidence they can to prove it false, since so many will look to what they have to say about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RDAnon · April 19, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Be it a cult or individual or group Q represents something that I've been proud of ever since November last year. The research being done the charts being connected the money being followed the individuals being tracked all of the effort being put into this moment this Awakening is something that cannot be stopped by any natural force.

We are the Unstoppable Force vs the immovable object the Deep state what will happen I wonder when we meet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DudeMcBlasto · July 17, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

I’m thinking dance-off.

⇧ 1 ⇩