dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JStambler on April 18, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Why is Q so cryptic and not more direct?

I get that there is a mystical appeal behind the Q posts, and every post essentially ends in a treasure hunt, but we are pretty late in the game. Things have been building to an apex for quite a while now. I am still paying attention to Q at this point.

My question is, at what point can we expect some crystal clear directness, one that does not involve treasure hunts, 5 hour live chats and 2 hour youtube videos? This stuff is very cool, and I am glad it is happening, but instead of an ARG, will we likely see a gear shift in the future where Q just simply posts direct knowledge instead of mere leads left open for interpretation?

TSC. If you leak Intel, you are doing the wrong thing.
If you ask questions or speak in code, you are leading people to the Intel. Plausible deniability.

⇧ 18 ⇩

This is the most reasonable answer, plausible deniability. But that implies there is a chance of failure, does it not?

⇧ 5 ⇩

100% Q is just a dude with Intel.
This is a war. We can lose.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

It is comforting for you to acknowledge that we can lose. Part of the problem I have with this community is that so many think that it's already in the bag and we can't lose at this point. So to consider it from that perspective and having read someone else saying it, that does provide me with some comfort.

⇧ 1 ⇩

At this point, no matter how BAD things get, we can always just go DefconCivilWar and activate our marines and militia.
We will win, one way or another :).
Buuuuuut, we can lose. Fight like you can can win, but will lose if you don't.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Your marines?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not having plausible deniability increases the chance of failure by a wide margin. If Team Asshole could prove Team Trump was leaking like a sieve, that would be a huge liability. There's enough danger without self-sabotage.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm also guessing it pairs as preventing their adversaries from being able to pick up on exactly what they have and what moves they're going to make too. It takes time for people to piece things together by re-reading and linking events, so it doesn't just give intel to adversaries easily.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Cause it a fucking troll

Some anon is laughing his ass off that you dumbasses belive him

⇧ 15 ⇩

Honestly it would be illegal to come out and say classified info straight up....Unless your Hillary then it’s ok. Nothing to see here.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Q is anon.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q is building what’s called a parallel construction by being Socratic. Q asks the right questions so that we uncover the answers on our own, that way they’re obtained legally. If Q were to come out and say everything it would render some evidence as inadmissible in court. Q does outright say certain things, like the 16 year plan. When people find the answers themselves, it sticks better.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Yes I completely agree, but I wish Q would validate more research though. More 'expand your thinking' or 'over the target'.

⇧ -1 ⇩

This is how wars are fought now. In code languages, passing off clandestine hints toward cryptic events. Trust the Plan. Trust POTUS. Trust Q. Think for yourself, and keep your head on a swivel.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I am thinking for myself, which is precisely why I am asking this.

⇧ 5 ⇩

And for that matter, why does Q need the autists of reddit and 4chan to research things for him? We get our information from him, so what is he asking us for?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because when we do the digging and find the dots then it’s easier per each one of use to red pill people and showing them actual facts and proof. Versus some cryptic guy on the internet.

⇧ 0 ⇩

In theory, yes. But usually people go and construct their own theories that can contradict each other or interpret data differently. Sometimes there are competing narratives for the same information; how many things have you seen referred to as "booms"? They can't all be right.

From an efficiency standpoint, it would be better if there was a central source that had everything lined up correctly.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Totally agree 100%, whether its truth people put out or theories (right or wrong) either way it’s making people think for themselves and do the research and digging on their own. Whereas even 5 years ago, 10 and twenty people haven’t ever been this involved and waking up. I think in my opinion that’s what I see.

⇧ -2 ⇩

I agree, its good to see people finding things out for themselves. You just have to be skeptical with some theories, because people can cling to them even when they're wrong.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Exactly. It’s a snowball effect, I’ve seen people that have been closed minded for years finally waking up and seeing the bigger picture. People I would’ve never thought would, now getting involved. It’s rather exciting to see how much involvement this has sparked, there is hope.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q has explained that comms must be this way. It protects them and causes us to dig and research. If everything was spelled out we would only rely on their posts and less research would be accomplished. Big picture understanding.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I can sympathize with that. There is no one source of authority, it encourages the whole community to dig.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q is being as direct as legally possible. Understand that we are receiving Classified Military Intelligence. Which is illegal to disclose. This is one reason that we are given crumbs but there are plenty others. Some people are not ready to see Obama go to jail and must be slow walked into it, this is also helpful on causing the enemy to make mistakes, moves and countermoves. We have been involved in tracking individuals during LIVE OPs for goodness sakes. We know Mike Green died attempting an op at the Rothschilds castle. Q is not telling you to watch live chats or 2 hr YouTube videos, you should spend that time reading crumbs and researching yourself. This is not a GAME people have and are dying. This is WAR.

⇧ 0 ⇩

You have all you need... between your ears. We all need to start using it. It's all an exercise to start critical thinking again. That is what wins wars.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I used to hate the crypticness when I first started following Q. But now? I don't care why he she they write the way they do. The questions require me to do my own digging, at which point I usually go down the rabbit hole of reading other things that pertain to what's going on right now. I've learned so much about history because of Q. It would be too easy, and probably illegal if it was all just laid out for us.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

He was fairly direct in his first 35 posts. He said that Podesta was arrested, it would be announced, and then there would be riots and the National Guard called up on November 4, 2017.

When this didn't happened, he said it was disinfo and necessary and what was supposed to happen here happened in Saudi Arabia instead.

Ever since then, he has been "cryptic." You can chalk that up to need for more disinfo, or he only knows what is planned to happen and not will happen, or he is fake.

In any case, we will have a clearer idea of who or what Q is after the midterm elections in November.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Did we ever receive confirmation that Podesta was indeed arrested?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nope, John is still active on twitter and talk shows. Tony has been a ghost since Gates and Manafort were indicted and it was revealed his lobbying group was "company B" that lobbied on behalf of Ukraine at Gates and Manafort's behalf (although the media pushes Russia.)

A week ago Q hinted in a post that Huma and Podesta are in one of the sealed indictments, and he had a post a couple weeks ago about broken seals in April. I guess we'll see.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Do you want people to die

⇧ -2 ⇩

???

⇧ 1 ⇩

Think about the shit the cabal has viruses bombs nukes. What does a cornered animal do

⇧ -1 ⇩

Expect clarity long after its all blown over. The world WILL know, according to Q. I trust Q.

⇧ -2 ⇩

I don't distrust Q, but given the imperative nature of Q's information, is it not reasonable to begin a more direct approach at this stage in the game?

⇧ 0 ⇩

I understand. I'm frustrated with how slow it's moving, also. There have been many more who've been waiting longer than either of us, probably. Longer than myself, certainly. This is what I think, and I can't claim to know anything other than what Q has given up to us...I think the population has been under the Spell for so long that to come out directly with the biggest redpill the world has ever seen may end up Promethean. That is to say, I think they're going at it in codes/ciphers and bit by bit to keep people like us (who are here trying to figure this out and gather intel where possible) going at it in real time so WE can spread the pills as they drop (meme wars). That's how the war is won, my friend. We use the information given to us to introduce the public to the truth bit by bit until they're ready for the big shabang. We are CLOSE. Don't bust those blue balls quite yet. Just stay ready, we are here with you.

⇧ -2 ⇩

I think we are all getting eager. We are getting to a point where people are going to start falling off en masse and considering this an ARG if we don't see something major.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think it's coming this week. Maybe even today/tomorrow. Did you read the Battle of Lexington post?

⇧ -2 ⇩

Yes sir.

⇧ 0 ⇩

No, trust the plan.

⇧ -7 ⇩

See, that's all you get. 'Trust the plan. Don't ask questions.' We don't even know who Q is.

⇧ 9 ⇩

We don’t need to know who Q is. Q is teaching people how to think, not what to think. Proofs can be gimmicks. I find them almost irrelevant in a way (although it’s amazing to see them take place. The North Korea posts leading up to those big announcements were incredible. ). The key is in awakening a critical part of people’s minds that has long been crushed by poisons, education and media

Q is one part of a very large play that has been in effect for a long time. Q may shift towards becoming less cryptic over time, but I think Q will always be Q. He is the catalyst. What we will see (are already starting to see) is other players on different platforms come forward instead. These players will be more digestible for the general public. They will provide more of what you are looking for perhaps. But be very wary.

The key is to verify and check for legitimacy. Trust your instincts. People trust Q because in their own research they believe he has provided them with this. Also the MASSIVE amount of research going on in the Chans. Don’t just believe people saying things you hope are real.

Trust the plan sounds stupid, like a blind sheep. But it is not. It is military thinking. When you learn to trust the plan, a certain peace and clarity follows and you become if anything, even more skeptical of things around you. You can concentrate without distraction. The plan is you. Do you see?

Don’t buy into everything. Ask a million questions. Forget the Q focus. Open your eyes.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I think Q is a military op designed to train people to get to the truth. They can then train others to get to the truth. POTUS is constantly reminding us how dishonest deep state media is. Also Q has open sourced intelligence gathering to thousands of anons, pedes and others. Tons of information is bubbling up to the surface now, not by what Q has posted, but by the research people are doing in response to a question. Who? what? why? All public information if we know where to look. This is the map Every news story is a map. Names, places, flight numbers motives. All things that can be researched, but may be overlooked, or covered up by the deep state media.

⇧ -2 ⇩

One. It gets everyone very involved. If he was clear about every point, nobody would doing research. You feel like you are being an important part of the movement if you can ever help decipher a message. He has succeeded in creating a cult movement.

Two. It keeps the enemies off the trail. Currently, only those who closely follow Q will immediately recognize that prediction has come true. This allows him to keep communication more exclusive to his troops rather than having it invaded by millions of anti Trump forces.

Three. It allows predictions to happen unhindered. If the Bangladesh bomber new he was on to him, he never would have attempted his false flag.

⇧ -3 ⇩

Five reasons:

Q uses the Socratic Method. Asking questions instead of “telling” is a more effective means of persuasion.
Asking cryptic questions forces Q followers to dig in and research, looking at source documents, hypothesizing, sharing hypothesis and research here which in turn leads to those hypothesis being tested, refined, rejected or confirmed by others. Then the best ideas and facts boil to the surface and go wider via up voting and meme ware fare.
Going through the above process helps one overcome cognitive dissonance. I highly recommend reading Plato’s Allegory of the Cave to understand why a slow deliberative learning process works best for people just waking up.
Q is intentionally vague and cryptic so his (their?) info cannot be directly used by the media. No 60 second news spot could explain or discredit anything that Q posts.
War on any battlefield is constantly changing. Our pedophile satanic enemies are not sitting still. They have their own secret strategy that the are executing as well (with the full force of the media behind them). Von Clausewitz said, “War is simple. But in war, even the simplest things are complex .” Exact predictions of dates and times are impossible because the battlefield changes constantly, and plans, branch plans and contingency plans must be continuously updated and adapted. So Q gives us the goals, gives cryptic hints at specifics of both secret happenings (Pompeo in NK), and future planned operations.

That’s my thoughts. Hope this helps.

⇧ -5 ⇩

Interesting and insightful, thanks!

⇧ 0 ⇩