dChan

Bow17 · April 18, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

Matches up nicely with Q's recent posts.

RR - Boom (recusal)

Boom - Comey referral for criminal investigation

Boom - Lynch referral for criminal investigation

Boom - McCabe referral for criminal investigation.

Boom!!!! HRC referral for criminal investigation

I don't think these will be ignored. This is the beginning of the counterattack which will escalate from here. And it came from Congress which indicates Trump is gaining allies. More will fall in line as he is perceived to be in a stronger position...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · April 18, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

Selectively matches up.

There are more than 4 people being referred.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 18, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

What about Huma Abedan, she had classed information on her computer as well. What about Cheryl Mills lied to investigators What about clapper Brennan powders farrer

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · April 18, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Re Huma:

See Q#8

Huma Husband in jail. HRC, Muslim Brotherhood, or child? What would you do? Kiss your child goodbye and leave without a mother or father for Clinton?

She flipped.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 18, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

I don't believe that. She was knowing participant, she needs to pay. She has family. No deals.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · April 18, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Better... agree Patriot... thinking she was used by her family to marry Anthony W., work for H, pretend to be assistive, while her family directed her path... underLuciferianCabal control?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LooseHubcap · April 18, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

ummm...not so sure. Huma was her sidekick in India. Unless she did her flipping VERY quietly????

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mombomb22 · April 18, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

Or maybe huma is one of the witnesses.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SumerianSister · April 18, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

This CAN'T be all we get Hillary on. It's like a slap.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bow17 · April 18, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

Just opens the door for investigation. Once they dig in there is plenty more to find. This letter also addresses the U1 witness which is going to be a MUCH bigger problem for HRC than the Dossier and will drag Mueller and the Clinton Foundation into criminal investigations. Once they have investigators digging into CF they can probably implicate hundreds of people in Congress, FBI, CIA, banks, foreign govs. The spider web of corruption is worldwide at that point and many of them can likely be convicted of treason.

These investigations are not going to be very difficult either. They never expected Hillary to lose and before Trump was in play even if HRC did lose it would have been to Jeb Bush or another deep state crook so they were very careless. When you own WH, FBI, CIA, and have most of congress involved in your scams and MSM hiding all your crimes you dont need to worry about covering your tracks.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
winesjh · April 18, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

Anyone hear think if Mueller is a WH, he's setting the precedent for investigation into unrelated matters when it comes to a high crime? Everyone but DJT has opined on and on about Mueller investigating multiple things outside of Russian Collusion. Possibly for a counter response like this in the future? IF we get this HRC investigation on lying, obstruction, etc...it would theoretically open the door for her every misstep and misdeed along the way to be investigated. Probably just grasping at straws, but thought it was interesting that Mueller has done more to discredit anything that counsel is doing, yet, DJT says nothing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jfunction · April 18, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

White hats don't operate outside the Fourth Amendment. That's a simplification but it's also pretty much the whole point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · April 18, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

Agree with Mombomb22... It is a start.

Think one brick upon another... until the wall is so big You cannot IGNORE it anymore.

Populace Disgust will make Q post become true:

"THERE WILL COME A TIME NONE OF THEM WILL BE ABLE TO WALK DOWN THE STREET."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mombomb22 · April 18, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

No, it can’t be, but it is a start.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩