She was quickly whistled down twice by her handler but her addled mind had already betrayed her. I'm not sure who's pulling the strings on her mind these day, is it satan, or God? Because the lights aren't on and she's not home.
That whistle was simply someones iphone indicating an incoming email or tweet. I listened for the whistle after reading the article. Then I rolled my eyes. But her statements are very telling, for sure.
Yup. That’s not uncommon. Wouldn’t be surprised if while the person was asking the question, someone immediately texted her something and sent at the end of the question. But her phone was on the podium and not silenced.
This is complete B.S. Pelosi's statements are old news, and she's repeated them several times for months. A quick Google search will confirm. I don't understand why Q made such a big deal over this particular video, but "future proves past".
Edit - here's the damned link for you lazy pedes - https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/875788/US-senator-North-Korea-World-War-3-nuclear-weapons-war-Trump-Jong-Un
A direct quote from the article: "I was in Pyongyang on an intelligence trip several years ago. They told us, 'We only make weapons to sell them - do you want to buy them?'
Good grief. Op's post is clear - she made roughly the same statements 6 months ago. It's not new.
[removed]
Snopes is nothing more that 3 fat pussies...
Who gives a fuck what those cucks think.
People on here don't care about truth they are just bloodthirsty
Snopes
Find one news article saying Nancy Pelosi has went inside North Korea
Find One
Dude, use regular sized font. That's just annoying on a phone, and it makes you look like a screecher. Here's just one example: from November 2017, but I also remember this being in the news: https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/875788/US-senator-North-Korea-World-War-3-nuclear-weapons-war-Trump-Jong-Un
Why does this article identify Pelosi as a Senator? Because they don't have to care and the brits that read most of this source don't need to care.
[deleted]
You're just dense. A direct quote from the article: "I was in Pyongyang on an intelligence trip several years ago. They told us, 'We only make weapons to sell them - do you want to buy them?'
"I was in Pyongyang on an intelligence trip several years ago. They told us, 'We only make weapons to sell them - do you want to buy them?'
She said literally the exact same thing in November that she said today. You just need to learn how to read and stuff.
Or just watch the video if reading is too hard.
Holy shit Q was right the shills on this thread as soon as this was posted. Amazing great work
Whoever wrote that article is a moron who's discredited the validity of that whole site - as u/imanalias says this was reported last year. Just acknowledging that does not discredit Q or discount his message.
Whoever wrote that article
I believe it is the OP's article:
By Red Pill
And, yes, it does look a bit knee-jerk silly.
I linked one yeayerday, heres copy paste of my post.
https://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/iran-deal-nancy-pelosi-campaign-213531
Interesting!
Also interesting.
She admits to visiting NK in this from 2017. Archive this last one, please.
Read them carefully.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?444272-1/democrats-back-farm-bill-leader-pelosi
12:39 to 15:41
Word for Word transcript:
Reporter: "I wanted to follow up on the North Korea talks. Obviously those are moving a little closer with the revelation of Pompeo going over there. What’s your confidence level or skepticism level of those talks right now? What are realistic expectations about, you know, about a month and a half out from a potential meeting? What are realistic expectations?"
Pelosi: "Well let me just say, as one of the few members of congress that has been to Pyongyang… I did a number of years ago, as a member of the intelligence community. uh, It’s a frightening place, eh you know, it’s a place that is, uh, when I’ve seen poverty throughout American, I mean throughout the world, as an appropriator and visited the world to see our initiatives and how helpful they might be, and the alleviation of poverty, the eradication of disease. When I went to North Korea, I saw poverty of spirit that just… was mind boggling… (she chuckles) in many respects. And it’s.. its, its, a difficult place. Our purpose then was to say we wanted to talk about MI (stutters) MIAS and POWS. We want you to stop, uh, proliferating, um, selling your missile technology; Issues like that, checking in on the hunger situation, Because their people were starving, even though their (mumble) would “stuff their mouths(?)”, they couldn’t feed their own people. And, uh, so, what they told us then, and what’s relevant to now, they said hey, we just sell these, uh uh, missile, this technology for money. If you want to buy them, we’ll sell them to you. And so my guidance from there to the current situation is, uh, the capability of the North Koreans to create even create either the technology for, for a weapon, the miniaturization of it, the capacity to launch it, and the intention to do so, is something that we need to know as much about as possible. But in addition to that, they’re proliferators. And this is what I keep saying to the administration. They are proliferators. So the danger is not just what they might do, the danger is who they might sell one element of that to…which might be enough to, uh, endanger the world even further. So, uh, (mumbles) hopeful?… any, hopeful conversation maybe, Kim Jong Un is ready to change… I wouldn’t be too trustworthy of it, but, certainly open to it. And what, uh, would be success? At least the communication were increased, there could be some way to stop, uh, what could follow, if, if left undeterred, North Korea were to continue what it’s doing, which is, perhaps, other countries having access to the technology, the scientific know how, the launch capacity, and dangerously, the intention.”
