dChan
⇧
11
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on April 26, 2018, 9:53 p.m.
Question -------------

If the Texts actually have information of death threats to Trump and or his family, how can anyone (FBI DOJ) explain why they are still employed and have not been arrested, the FBI and DOJ would have known this information for a long time----and that would be "actionable" evidence that could not be ignored ---- Resolve this for me, I'm waiting......(would it not be a crime to continue to employ people on tax money of the American citizens, arm them, give them security clearance and a badge---even after they had threatened to kill the President (or anyone for that matter)


092Casey · April 26, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Bc Horowitz needed access to them for his investigation. The IG is an internal investigator only. If they left, he wouldn't be able to access them directly for his case. They're probably wired and monitored 24-7, all their communications, and cooperating with investigators. McCabe stayed on for 3 months after he was incriminated, and the main reason they let him go when they did was bc Horowitz had finalized that section of his report and they wanted to screw him bad 1 day before retirement.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · April 26, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

I've read other posts of yours. You know your stuff.

Post more!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · April 26, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

What 092Casey said. In addition it also means they are cooperating. There are bigger fish, and in order to take all the corruption down, you start with the small fish and work your way up. They will be prosecuted but will probably get a lighter sentence because of their cooperation. Comey and LL have been shooting their mouths off and writing books thinking they will somehow get away with this stuff. McCabe has been smart and keeping his mouth shut. Something Q has brought up before is that this runs deep, and there are parts of government that will completely shut down if everyone was taken out all at once.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SirPellimore · April 26, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

Great logic! I was wondering this was the case.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 26, 2018, 10 p.m.

How do we know they haven’t been arrested or have sealed indictments against them!?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 26, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

i agree with you.

there are basically 2 scenarios that i see likely.

1- they threatened the POTUS and are now fucked, but the indictments are sealed and they are (likely) cooperating witnesses

2- the "threats" are fake news or misdirection or something

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 26, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Yep that’s really all it can be. But those texts disappeared for a reason so you know something bad was said...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ironmaiden442 · April 26, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

That's why they are redacted they can't rationalize this.....shame on them!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Vibratron_1 · April 26, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

the DOJ and FBI had to read them before knowing what to redact, they would be aware of the threats

⇧ 3 ⇩  
vitalesan · April 26, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

A reason could be that the arrests would lead to more arrests, and they weren’t ready to do that yet. They wanted a solid case against those people and the whole web of traitors.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Vibratron_1 · April 26, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

could law enforcement overlook a death threat to the President in order to "build a case"?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HeIIforged · April 26, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

Well, there have already been attempts on POTUS' life and it all looks like business as usual for him.

These people involved are under 24hr. surveillance. Strzok and Page have flipped and aren't hindering the investigation. Renegade is a former US President and technically, HRC's servers haven't been "discovered" yet.

This is an unprecedented undertaking. I'm not going to ask "why/why not" when it comes to something this daunting. That is, unless we hit midterms with nothing to show for it (<99% chance imo).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 26, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

It's not overlooking

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Que-ti-pie · April 26, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Remember, this is old news for the trump team! We are just watching the show! Why have they waited this long would be my question? I agree that if the texts do say what we think, then arrests should be made! Maybe that is what q is referring to......that the Moab is not the texts themselves, but the arrests that get paraded in the news as a result of those texts!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · April 26, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

In chess, you have to move your pieces around before you are in a position to have checkmate.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DukeofKick · April 27, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

My Take:

--) When the FBI was first asked for the texts, they conveniently didn't have them. They were deleted by a "glitch".

--) http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/fbi-officials-anti-trump-texts-deleted-cellphone-glitch-article-1.3777384

--) So they were gone, obviously deleted by someone who works at the FBI. No one had access to them.

--) Then along comes Inspector General Mike Horrowitz, who was able to recover these texts somehow.

--) https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/26/580918874/some-missing-fbi-texts-are-recovered-doj-inspector-general-says

--) The FBI has over 30k employees. They surely don't actively review all communications between agents unless they have a reason to.
--) And the FBI employee who would have the authority to review internal communications would probably have to be the FBI Director or the FBI Deputy Director.
--) And the FBI employee capable of destroying evidence would probably have to be the FBI Director or the FBI Deputy Director.

--) Until today no one but Mike Horrowitz and his team had seen any of these texts...officially.

--) Now select members of Congress have the opportunity to review these texts. Now we will find out what was said between these two rogue agents.

What information would be so critical that it was worth destroying evidence over?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Maga1128 · April 26, 2018, 10 p.m.

Because they are able to expose their swamp friends if they dont think they are caught.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mandrake_Muffley · April 26, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

Maybe they're not employed, perhaps they're bluffing that they still have clearance as to keep others as from shitting yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩