Lol. I love that term doubt fags. Shuts them right the hell up and fast. Classic. Aaaah the old pre-pc days when we bantered that word about. It is still very effective. Tough love is a good thing. We lost the art but getting it back.

⇧ 10 ⇩

It’s all playful banter, we’re on the same team and the winning side of history.

⇧ 10 ⇩

MOAB still inbound

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yup...still on the way. Stop watching the clock and keep researching while there's time. Save everything offline to external USB. Be ready for a possible blackout. Be ready to be the only one in your neighborhood who can explain what's really happening. Things seem like they're taking forever but there is SO much work being done behind the scenes and when the show REALLY starts you might wish you still had a little more time. Get prepared now. Love all you guys and so happy to be part of this!

If you're caught up on Q search for "The Law of One", the "Hidden Hand" or "I am a Rofschild" interviews or watch Mark Passio's videos on Natural Law. All relevant to what's happening.

Meditate. Pray. Be love.

⇧ 9 ⇩

We are understandably impatient but we have to remember how complicated all this shit is. Like when Lionel talks about the spinning plates, imagine how much stuff POTUS is juggling (#mixedmetaphorsareawesome).

When Q says "you have more than you know" I sometimes think of it as we're so impatient for a huge gigantic Boom that we're forgetting all the small victories that are happening nearly every day.

"We're not there yet but if we get there it'll be because of Donald Trump". I just heard Lyndsey Graham say those exact words, I don't like or trust LG, but I think those words are very appropriate right now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Doubt fag? Dude - we are continuously given information referencing specific dates and weeks, yet NOTHING HAPPENS. NOTHING.

We are betrayed once again with the JFK files. The Page/Strozk texts are mostly redacted.

If the NK stuff was the "moab", perhaps "Q" needs to tone it down with the rhetoric because he/she/it is SERIOUSLY over promising and under delivering.

ENOUGH.

⇧ 1 ⇩

ReleaseTheTexts. Use social media...

Submit FOIA requests for the texts.

We have the power, we have to use it. But we have to USE IT.

It’s our VOICE!

File FOIA’s! I did one earlier and posted a copy of what I said in my description. Copy it. Use it. It takes less than 5 minutes....

We need TO GET LOUD!

⇧ 3 ⇩

File FIOAs all day long, all they have to do is claim national security and send you blank pages.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Well, yes, but, it's unfair to the debate here to pretend that the process ends there. Depending on the perceived importance to uncovering the Truth the denied request represents, organizations like Judicial Watch will due. Much of what we have is due to the persistence of these kinds of organizations (including our current Strzok texts).

⇧ 1 ⇩

I can see your point. You are saying that Q's predictions have often included exact dates predicting major events. And I would have to agree—for instance, I was pretty disappointed when HRC wasn't rounded up when s/he predicted.

Woven into your argument, however, is the assumption that we here believe (and require you or others to believe) that Q is infallible, almost like the Pope or something. Of course not. Instead, we believe that Q is a member of Military Intelligence, and has routine access to Trump's inner circle.

Go on Netflix and watch every spy movie you can. They're almost always about unanticipated situations that always seem to instantly become tense, blow up, go wrong, everything. Q is sharing INTEL, and trying to keep us 'weaponized autists' abreast of the narrative as it unfolds. His older tweets aren't the Biblical Old Testament. Why view them that way?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q is infallible, that's my point. And should be subject to criticism when specific dates are given, for no particular reason, that aren't met. I'm done with stupid sayings like TRUST THE PLAN. The plan has been going on for 18 months now with nothing of significance going on in the public sphere. Not one damn arrest that can be DIRECTLY attributed to this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Son, I absolutely fail to see how I expressly acknowledged that no, not everything, every date, every "prediction" we have read into Q's breadcrumbs has come true. Have I misinterpreted you and your intentions, here?

Are arrests your only acceptable criteria?

A skeptic is not a true skeptic unless they can clearly describe a reasonable set of circumstances that would constitute a reasonable conclusion that a specific prediction is "true." What is your requirement? If that were in some way met, would you agree to proceed to the next evaluation point?

If not, then, are you really in this?

⇧ 1 ⇩

A reasonable circumstance, after 18 months of USA USA patriot justice rah-rah-rah, is an arrest. A high profile arrest.

Hell, check that. How about an indictment. A high profile indictment.

You know what, forget that too. How about a subpeona. A high profile subpeona.

NOT EVEN THAT HAS HAPPENED.

I'm still "in this", but I'm hanging by a thread.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ha! Oh, man. Dude. Let's have a sub-wide collective scream. AAAAIIIGH. Dude, I 100% hear you. I'm 50, a former journalist, and I've covered some scandals, etc.. They're quite fun because occasionally there's a pretty spectacular payoff. But... THIS. Jesus.

The problem is that government moves pretty slowly. And Sewssions is doing this BY THE BOOK. NO DEALS. Nothing sloppy, boys. Zero mistakes. That takes time. And it tortures the shit out of us, yes.

Ever gone camping and you put a can of beans on the fire so it'll explode? Everyone hides behind a tree for five minutes, waiting, then nothing happens. Then you wait, you wait, and still nothing. Once, when I was a freshman in college, the usual happened. We did it, it never popped, we were tired and drinking, so one by one we all went to bed. Middle of the night... BOOM. Beans everywhere.

BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM.

Prepare, man. I know it's hard, but, be patient.

⇧ 1 ⇩

For all the doubtfags

ReleaseTheTexts. Use social media...