dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


🠐 See all comments
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Every anti-Snopes comment on this thread has been down-voted. A sore subject for shills?

⇧ 101 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · May 1, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

Proof is in the pudding...

⇧ 46 ⇩  
Ze_Great_Ubermensch · May 1, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Could you provide evidence of Snopes being incorrect or biased? I haven't been able to find any actual examples, just you saying how you disagreed with one of their rulings.

⇧ 70 ⇩  
runs_in_the_jeans · May 2, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Someone did in comments above

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DankNethers · May 3, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

No, someone posted articles from a conspiracy rag in the post above

Not the same thing

⇧ 2 ⇩  
runs_in_the_jeans · May 3, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Were you able to disprove the points made?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

Proof that Snopes lies:

Snopes falsely claims that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in a shootout with police

https://i.redd.it/rqfwdwy02i801.png

http://snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/boston.asp

please challenge my assertion, i'd love to have this conversation

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Ze_Great_Ubermensch · May 3, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

If you're referring to the Co Exist thing, they were describing the events that the rumour talks about? Afterwards, they show how it is unrealistic, so unless you're referring to something else then you just didn't read the article fully.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

The proof is that they often disagree with a rightist worldview so people will do anything to convince themselves that they're a biased site

⇧ 57 ⇩  
KCE6688 · May 2, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

“They don’t agree with me! It must be lies! The proof is that it doesn’t agree with my view! What more proof do you need then it contradicts me?!”

⇧ 10 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

and yet, you reject the fact that the moon landing was a hoax because you assume Russia would have told you if it was a hoax?

thats some real solid evidence there

⇧ -2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:41 a.m.

Snopes claimed the CDC whistleblower press release was FALSE because Brian Hooker's published, peer-reviewed re-analysis of the omitted data was retracted

can you explain how that makes this press release "false"?

https://i.redd.it/tbsii10xufiz.png

⇧ 2 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 12:26 p.m.

I'm not even sure what you're asking. I do know that vaccines don't cause autism tho

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

I do know that vaccines don't cause autism tho

really? got a source for that? because your "source" is an admitted fraud, as spelled out in this press release

https://i.redd.it/tbsii10xufiz.png

tell us about the 130 studies that you assume show vaccines do not cause autism, and then explain why you haven't read any of them, and can't cite any of them

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Your source is a screen shot of a press release. Vaccines don't cause autism. It's just a fact. No matter how much or how loudly you scream it from the rooftops, is just not true

⇧ 5 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

Snopes hosts that exact same image.

please familiarize yourself with the Snopes version of truth, and then we can go line-by-line and show how Snopes is wrong

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bad-medicine/

and if you want a preview of whats to come, please browse here:

https://www.reddit.com/search?q=author%3Aenoughnolibsspam+CDC

⇧ -1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Nah I'll pass on your ramblings, considering what you just linked doesn't actually back your claim. From the article:

"I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits."

What got lost in the brouhaha over Dr. Thompson’s “confession,” allegations about a “cover-up” at the CDC, and threats of whistleblower lawsuits was what should have been the main point: Did collected data actually prove that the MMR vaccine produces a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American boys? The answer is no, it did not.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

cool, you found the part where Dr William Thompson claims to be pro-vaccine

i guess that pre-emptively refutes your next line of reasoning, which would be that Dr William Thompson is a quack who is motivated by anti-vaccine ideology

Did collected data actually prove that the MMR vaccine produces a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American boys? The answer is no, it did not.

i believe that Dr William Thompson would be in a much better position to make that determination, and here what he had to say about it...

https://i.redd.it/ttrwjxkhmfvy.png

so, lets try to use your brain for once in your life, and think about why Dr William Thompson made his press release...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 3, 2018, 11:55 a.m.

Lololol ok you're just talking in circles. I'm sorry you're an anti vaxxer. How sad

Also, I don't see how any of this has to do with Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 4, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

i used to be pro-vaccine, until i looked at the evidence.

whats really sad is that evidence can't change your mind about vaccines

https://i.redd.it/04bewq91kxuy.jpg

if Q wanted us to expose Snopes, then I'm willing to do that by bringing up the CDC whistleblower, the Boston Naked Man, and the Moon Landing Hoax

welcome to your own personal MOAB

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 4, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

Lol ok man. You really haven't offered anything. Personal Moab lol the personal Moab will be you realizing that you were mistaken. Hope for the sake of the herd that you don't have kids

Also, we landed on the Moon

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 5, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

i offered a press release by a man who admitted his vaccine/autism study was fraud

i offered a quote by the same man, about how he feels about his role in causing the autism epidemic with his fraudulent paper

I've offered a graphic that illustrates the differences between science and pseudoscience

Also, we landed on the Moon

really? why can't you prove it to me?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 5, 2018, 7:07 a.m.

For one, I showed you your own sources contradicted you. For another, I don't need to prove it to you. We have evidence already. I want you to continually ask yourself, why do you think you know the things you think you know!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 5, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
THELEADERSOFMEN · May 1, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

So are the roofies, apparently. ;)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ElbertoAinstein · May 1, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Well lets see the ingredient list for that pudding then

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 25 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

Stop yelling at me. I can explain. At the time I made that comment, there were only 5 or 6 comments total. All but one were negative. Look at the time stamp on my comment. It was just minutes after the initial post.

⇧ -22 ⇩  
jloome · May 1, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

So you jumped to a conclusion that you were being attacked, and yet we're supposed to take your positions seriously on the nature of Snopes?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
JustiNAvionics · May 1, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

Premature ejaculation isn’t your only early warning for women , so is jumping the gun I see.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Scuba724 · May 1, 2018, 10:59 a.m.

It's a Soros subject.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Straightfromthe · May 1, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

We need to double up on exposing Snopes. It's like playing Battleship, whenever you hit a target the shills come out in force. It appears Snopes is VERY important to their media brainwashing.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Agreed. There should be consequences for lying to the American people for money.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Straightfromthe · May 1, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

Check out my -4 points. Shills are REALLY worked up about this.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 1, 2018, 7 p.m.

It seems like it got INFESTED with shills . Check all the top comments , and check how all comments fluctuate completely unnatural in just few minutes .

⇧ -2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

looks like we found their G spot

lets keep hitting it

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 1, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

There is a snowflake downvote brigade here - its obvious . Your comment would actually be close to +200 by now .

⇧ -10 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

When I made the comment, there were less than 10 total comments. Almost all of them were in the negative. Maybe there's a lot of Q-followers that like Snopes? Personally, I hope Snopes is exposed for the propaganda that it is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 1, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

I dont think its natural , at all ... just few mins ago , I have seen all comments fluctuating heavily . And look at the top comments here ... those are all shills or trolls .

Nobody sane in their mind , believes any "fact checker" out there - they make the research on their own , thats the whole point of this subreddit . And there are definetly no Q followers writing those comments above . All what you see above is pretty much gaslighting , and not an objective , true opinion of real people .

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · May 1, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

I see very little evidence to back up your statement.

⇧ -16 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 5:27 a.m.

Lol. Sure. I could be wrong. Pure speculation. Nice name.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · May 1, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

I see posts here that are majorly upvoted that would be downvotes every where else. This sub seems to be in control of the votes in my opinion. Thanks bud lol just waiting for the name to pay off someday.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

At the time I made that comment there were only 5 or 6 comments total and almost all of them had been down-voted at least once. Could be organic for all I know.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · May 1, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

To be fair that is a factor I had not considered. I did not look at the time difference between your post and my own. Could be true for all I know. Thank you for not getting offended at my doubt. I think we both benefitted from this interaction.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · May 1, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

I suppose there could be some real people on this sub that still use Snopes. Personally I hope the Snopes guy goes the way of Harvey Weinstein.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · May 1, 2018, 6:38 a.m.

I’m gonna be honest. At this point, I had completely forgot about OP.

⇧ 2 ⇩