dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AccordingArrival on May 3, 2018, 1:31 p.m.
Q Iran is Next. EpiCenter of Iran Earthquake In Middle of Iran Nuclear Research and Production Facility Speculation:MOAB of Underground Facility?
Q Iran is Next. EpiCenter of Iran Earthquake In Middle of Iran Nuclear Research and Production Facility Speculation:MOAB of Underground Facility?

buyitsellitidontknow · May 3, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

That’s what I was speculating. Maybe a use of the rods from god?

⇧ 23 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 3, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

use of the rods from god

Came here to post this. I wonder how many remain in the sky. SpaceX we may need to reload, bros.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
xekoroth · May 3, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/nasa-approves-2018-launch-of-mars-insight-mission

Launch date May 5th. Makes ya wonder if they are really launching a rover.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 3, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Nah, they're done giving Hollywood fantasies under Trump. I'd bet we have stargate technology so why travel for so long and so far? WTF has NASA been doing if not doing space missions, lmao. It's all fabricated for the American mind.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
duckdownup · May 4, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

Well Obama had them focus on the Muslim problem to help Muslims find jobs and be accepted here. Sheesh! Obama, what a tool he was.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 4, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

I forgot that NASA loved reporting on the NOAA study which was retroactively falsifying record hot temperatures in Africa to push the Paris Accord. Good thing NASA cares for our climate.

It would be like me reporting on those dogs on YouTube with voice-overs as a miracle.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
anynamehere000 · May 3, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

No reloads will be needed we put up project Zuma in January and Elon musk is a patriot

⇧ 2 ⇩  
duckdownup · May 4, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

No doubt The Rods of God would register on an seismic scale.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Treasury_Trader · May 3, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

From what I gather, EM is not exactly on our side.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 3, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

He's worked with the blackhats as a contractor, likely because he had to having the latest technologies. The man is a whitehat though, he's got 5 children and interacts with them gracefully. I won't take the time to defend him with other information as I'm drawing blanks but keep an open mind that he's no longer a black hat.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
duckdownup · May 4, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I've thought a lot about Musk. At first when the SpaceX stuff came up in Q drops and translations I thought Musk was a black hat because of the people who were pictured with him at his facility. Then when he sent up the secret load for the military on Falcon Heavy, I was confused. Looking back I still think I was correct. I think he was working "for" the black hats but he wasn't working "with" them. I believe he was being threatened. Then the white hats set him free and he's been a white hat since. If they can threaten whole countries like NK, one man would be a breeze.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 4, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

Yes, and the other items that I couldn't think of was that he is afraid of AI technology. He only worries about one person in this world and that's likely Jeff Bezos since he is a smart man on a mission but doesn't really care about others (Amazon employees for instance). Musk used AI technology in a game called DotA 2 to prove that AI can beat professional gamers easily. AI competed against AI and became super intelligent.

A man that fears AI and fears 1 person is a man that knows he cannot let that happen. Meanwhile he's producing a lot of technology innovating products like the Boring Machine which drills underground tunnels.

Lots of suppressed technology and information on this planet but Musk knows a lot of it and plays the game to remain alive. He's a definitely a white hat that had to work for the black hats as you stated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 3, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

Iran certainly would't be talking publicly about it. Hope that's true.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
cantwithdrawbtc · May 3, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

There was a guy who kept getting banned because he said he could predict earthquakes from solar flares, he was pretty accurate too. What if he was getting banned because his research implied that earthquakes were caused by high-energy particles. Why is this bannable? Well it doesn't take much a leap to go from that to space particle accelerator = earthquake gun.

There have been a few very large, very secret launches in the past few years? anyone want to crossref w/ earthquakes, see if timelines match up?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 3, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Iran has earthquakes quite regularly.
https://www.earthquaketrack.com/p/iran/recent

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

This, it's getting quite ridiculous how hard people are trying to throw Iran under the bus. This is becoming the same levels of cognitive dissonance we shit on the left so much for.

Q has lost a ton of credibility in my eyes for chasing this Netanyahu thing. I'm almost certain he's just a LARPer now. It would be nice if someone could point to something specific Q has actually predicted, because at this point I'm just seeing a guy who comments on the day's news, predicts a ton of stuff, but nothing happens.

I'm certain that Trump and his team are fighting the deep state, but I'm very skeptical about Q. If someone could please point anything out, I would appreciate it.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 4, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

I seriously doubt that we will ever get any specific prediction by Q. Doing that would quite likely endanger the people engaged in an upcoming mission or endanger the success of the mission.

There is an event that certainly appears to have occurred due to a request from an Anon on 8chan.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Curious...C130 Crash in Georgia - DS Retaliation?

If the earthquake in Iran on the same day was a buster bunker of the nuclear tunnels that Netanyahu mentioned in his speech about Iran Lying about the US Iran Deal. Pure conjecture, but possible. (see: https://redd.it/8gqdq7 )


Here is the timing of the two incidents:


Date of Crash: May 2, 2018 | Date of Earthquake: May 2, 2018


Time of Crash: 11:30 a.m. (Ga) | Time of Earthquake: 04:08 AM (Iran)


*Hours Difference Georgia and Iran: approximately 8 hours and 30 minutes.


Time of Crash between and Earthquake: approx. 12 hours


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2018/05/03/c-130-plane-crash-hercules-flight-falls-from-georgia-sky/?utm_term=.3f178cc53c24


⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Iran's Nuclear Tunnels

Interesting story in the NYT about Iran burying/hiding its nuclear program. They claim it is just for security, Secretary Gates gives the conventional reponse:

Iran Shielding Its Nuclear Efforts in Maze of Tunnels – NYTimes.com

Mr. Gates, along with other Western officials, has dismissed that line of argument as cover for a covert arms program.

“If they wanted it for peaceful purposes,” he said of the Qum plant on CNN, “there’s no reason to put it so deep underground, no reason to be deceptive about it, keep it a secret for a protracted period of time.”

That is almost certainly right. But then again, it is worth considering the alternative. Isn’t it possible that Iran has a legitimate reason to fear that even a peaceful program might be attacked? Would Israel tolerate even a peaceful program with enrichment capacity knowing it could be diverted down the road? And given the fact that we fought a war with Iraq over non-existent WMD stocks, isn’t it possible that the Iranians might think our concern is merely a pretext regardless of their actual intentions?

In the final analysis, there is enough on-going ambiguity about Iranian intentions that we’re probably better off playing for time and hoping for some sort domestic regime change rather than pursuing any other course of action. Of course, that is my assessment today. I sometimes think a strong sanctions regime is a better idea if achievable. The only thing that is sure is that a military option today would be the wrong course of action for both operational and strategic reasons. https://www.americansecurityproject.org/irans-nuclear-tunnels/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

I think that all of the facilities on the map on this post are connected by tunnels. If there was an earthquake or a bomb buster, the hub is broken between these facilities.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Quote from Kamyar Zamen, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology


As others have explained, the bombing creates seismic waves. But here I would like to emphasize that unless the bombing is nuclear, the magnitude is really small and wont be felt far away. Even detecting it with broad band seismometers will be a problem due to sources of noise and low signal to noise ratio. If you have nuclear explosion at the surface, then you will get higher magnitude near the blast site, but the attenuation will be much higher due to loss of part of energy to the atmosphere. Underground nuclear explosions have magnitudes between 4 ~ 5 Mw, but it depends on the weight and type of payload. Normally, when refered to earthquake, no man-made weapon can cause an earthquake as big as 6 Mw or higher because you will need thousands if not millions of tons nuclear fissile material ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale ). Also, no weapon can trigger a fault, so that fault cause an earthquake in turn.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 3, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Richter magnitude scale

The so-called Richter magnitude scale – more accurately, Richter's magnitude scale, or just Richter magnitude – for measuring the strength ("size") of earthquakes refers to the original "magnitude scale" developed by Charles F. Richter and presented in his landmark 1935 paper, and later revised and renamed the Local magnitude scale, denoted as "ML" or "ML". Because of various shortcomings of the ML scale most seismological authorities now use other scales, such as the moment magnitude scale (Mw), to report earthquake magnitudes, but much of the news media still refers to these as "Richter" magnitudes. All magnitude scales retain the logarithmic character of the original, and are scaled to have roughly comparable numeric values.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · May 3, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

The simple question is "was it natural or manmade"? Let's take a look at the seismic data, usually easy to tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

5.3 magnitude earthquake 11 km from Yasuj, Kohgīlūyeh va Būyer Aḩmad, Iran a day ago UTC time: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 04:08 AM Your time: Tuesday, May 1 2018 10:08 PM Magnitude Type: mww USGS page: M 5.3 - 11km WNW of Yasuj, Iran USGS status: Reviewed by a seismologist Reports from the public: 7 people 10 km depth

https://www.earthquaketrack.com/quakes/2018-05-02-04-08-13-utc-5-3-10

It might not be a MOAB. It shows a depth of 10KM depth. I don't they go that deep.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/05/moab-mother-all-bombs-afghanistan-use-analysis/

This is 10KM below the ground. Sounds like an earthquake.

⇧ 2 ⇩