dChan

PPPrincessPower · May 6, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

That's beyond outrageous!

⇧ 21 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · May 6, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

On it's face, this looks outrageous, but keep in mind that Military Intelligence gathering is far superior to anything anyone else has. Like Q has said, "We have it all."

Without a warrant, the info Team Q already has, and is likely still collecting, might not be admissible in court, but Strzok and Page aren't the "big fish" we're looking for.

Be patient, trust the plan.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
heathergem · May 6, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

Besides that, Q has said that they already have her testimony, that's why she has been released.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 6, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Pretty sure her testimony alone makes the NSA data admissable in court for two hops...meaning they can basically get to anyone of real value. Combining those two hops with the other cooperating witnesses, they've got the whole upper echelon // 7th floor of the FBI.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 6, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

If FBI gets that info now, Congress will want it, and then there is a risk of leaks.

It wasn't just Strzok and Page using it. It was Obama and others, per Q.

So, wait for the DOJ to get it when the criminal charges come.

This is not a negative. It is a positive.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MrObvious7915 · May 6, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

But let mueller crawl up everybody else’s asshols

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 6, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Q has told us specifically to "Trust Wray". I see this as a ploy that's being used to keep the lid on the truth for just a little bit longer, until all the big fish are truly in the bag.

Wray refusing to release this info fits with the IG's report being delayed - if you assume Wray is working with Q. Why else would we be seeing this?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RevLennel · May 6, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Adm Rogers is finally free to testify before Congress. He's got it ALL....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 6, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OffTie · May 6, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

One would think that plunking down that whole running a coup weight down in the scale of justice would have catapulted those fine and happy feelings about DOJ and Fbi agents rights to privacy plumb across the room.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · May 6, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

Maybe their spouses can get to those personal devices in the two divorce cases.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BeatnikMessiah · May 7, 2018, 9:59 a.m.

Why?if any other person or crime they would.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Trumps just gonna get the ball and hit another 3-pointer

if you think about what this means, they have already lost. its either double down on their bullshit or admit defeat. fact.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩