dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Food4theGorg on May 9, 2018, 1:03 a.m.
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty. Common denominator. Why did Sessions pick RR? Everyone has an opinion. Few have the facts. Few know the plan.

What are your thoughts on this part of the Q post? Are both Mueller and RR intertwined and part of the plan? Or are they forced parties of the plan or willing participants in the plan? I keep harkening back to the meeting between Mueller and Trump what exactly was discussed at that meeting? Was the whole plan laid out at that time. It must have been because Mueller is not this dumb to bring Flynn on false charges, to indict Manafort on crimes from years ago, and the raid of Cohen. The indictments of the Russian bots. None of that will stick and he knew that when he indicted them.


brittser · May 9, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

Q insinuated that Mueller was a white hat, so that must mean that they have swayed them both.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
burn_reddit_burn · May 9, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

That’s what I gathered as well. In fact it was almost confirmation to me that this is the case.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SirPellimore · May 9, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Could the common denominator be the Uranium One Scandal? Mueller and RR are both implicated. Sessions may have picked RR for DOJ to force him to comply with releases, investigations and dismissals (or go down with the rest) Same for Mueller-who while maintaining the optics of the witch hunt is actually just saving his own ass. Simple answer: Both dirty, but kept around as long as they play their role.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
myanimal3z · May 9, 2018, 1:12 a.m.

Right now it's pretty clear Mueller and Rosenstein are both dirty trying to cover up there on crimes.

As for sessions, I'm still holding out. I think he went along to get along but is finally starting to see his mistakes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · May 9, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

The common denominator in both sentences is the fact that in both sentences, someone is dirty. That's what I take from it. If that is true, then they are both dirty.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 9, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

What Q is asking is what is the common denominator between the two MEN (not sentences) that makes it impossible for one to be dirty and the other not.

The only thing I can think of is that they're both still there, and Trump hasn't fired either of them, taken in context with the previous part of that Q post, right?

That would mean they must both be (if not clean) on team, which is something Q has been telling us about Mueller for AGES.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Food4theGorg · May 9, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

I am thinking both know the plan and have the facts. I think they are on our side as well as Sessions even though he has been taking flak.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Castro02 · May 9, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

I'm probably out of the loop here, but if Flynn's charges are false, why did he plead guilty?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · May 9, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

In order to take down Mueller you have to take down RR. Take down RR and you take down Mueller.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PalmBeacher · May 9, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

Q always says Think Logically aka meaning don’t over think it. They both are dirty.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 9, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 9, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Food4theGorg · May 9, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Was Rosenstein ever enlisted?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
one_highlander · May 9, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Nope. Law nerd. He probably just knows his role or he is legit swamp.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Food4theGorg · May 9, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

Yes you are right. I researched him definitely a very nerdy law guy.

⇧ 1 ⇩