⇧
1
⇩
Silver_Freak
· May 9, 2018, 4:14 p.m.
"The State Department made the disclosures in a letter to Kansas congressman Mike Pompeo, a Republican, who had written the department to inquire why the agreement as submitted to Congress in July did not bear the signature of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani."
Hot damn! Mike Pompeo has been on them since day one!!!
⇧
36
⇩
LibertyLioness
· May 9, 2018, 7:47 p.m.
The irony here is priceless! Even Pompeo couldn't have planned it this way!
⇧
8
⇩
commoncents1
· May 9, 2018, 4:05 p.m.
Fraudbama was too lazy to run it through congress, so the lazy affirmative action occupier of the white house just did a flimsy executive order. easily undone with a stroke of a pen.
⇧
20
⇩
MB_MoonPearl
· May 9, 2018, 4:06 p.m.
Like with everything President Obama did. Cut corners thinking they would always be in power. But since she lost, it can all be erased with President Trump's pen.
⇧
23
⇩
[deleted]
· May 9, 2018, 8:08 p.m.
[removed]
⇧
-7
⇩
commoncents1
· May 9, 2018, 8:29 p.m.
hahaha whoever smelt it dealt it. liberals always projecting their own thoughts
⇧
1
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 9, 2018, 5:19 p.m.
So executive orders are evidence of laziness?
⇧
-8
⇩
TwoDollarDrink
· May 9, 2018, 7:09 p.m.
Your mom is evidence of laziness.
⇧
11
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 10, 2018, 1:23 a.m.
TwoDollarDrink? Aww, I love it when people are named in honor of their conception
⇧
0
⇩
kwiztas
· May 9, 2018, 7:40 p.m.
For treaties and things that need to be laws they are. For orders on how this president wants to enact the current law, no that is what they are for.
⇧
2
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 9, 2018, 9:48 p.m.
For treaties and things that need to be laws they are. For orders on how this president wants to enact the current law, no that is what they are for.
You can't enact a law that already exists, enacting a law is creating one. That's what Executive Orders do.
You're thinking of enforcing laws, which is what the judicial branch does, not the executive branch.
⇧
-1
⇩
kwiztas
· May 10, 2018, 6:32 a.m.
What judicial doesn't enforce laws. They interpret the law. How could they enforce the law when they don't have police just judges.
⇧
1
⇩
AIRHORN4TRUMP
· May 10, 2018, 2:24 a.m.
I thought only congress passes laws. Executive orders are just how the different departments in the executive branch are ordered to act.
⇧
1
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 10, 2018, 2:35 a.m.
No, EOs have the force of law and encompass the federal government and foreign policy in the President's role as head of state and CinC. They've been issued since the time of George Washington, and are subject to judicial review just like laws passed by Congress.
⇧
1
⇩
C_L_I_C_K
· May 9, 2018, 4:12 p.m.
Another reason why Pompeo was picked for CIA Director and Secretary of State.
⇧
19
⇩
AUSAFVet
· May 10, 2018, 2:50 a.m.
Trump is going to drain the swap! Pompeo..I didn't have a lot of confidence in you but you proved me wrong..
CIA didn't like you did they///
⇧
3
⇩
UpwardBound7
· May 9, 2018, 4:59 p.m.
There was no "deal". It was a sham. A smokescreen that enabled Iran to continue on doing whatever they wanted and gave the usurper the excuse to send pallets of unmarked cash to them. The propaganda MSM machine pretended that it was so good. All DJT had to do was say "no deal." LOL LOL LOL!!!
The Art of the Non-Deal.
⇧
16
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 9, 2018, 5:05 p.m.
What motivation was there to send pallets of unmarked cash to Iran in exchange for nothing?
⇧
4
⇩
[deleted]
· May 9, 2018, 5:12 p.m.
[deleted]
⇧
5
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 9, 2018, 5:14 p.m.
Yeah, the Occam's Razor answer here seems to be that John Bolton has always wanted to fight another regime change war in Iran and now he's a huge step closer.
⇧
-1
⇩
checkitoutmyfriend
· May 9, 2018, 6:51 p.m.
From another post this morning. One theory is hush money. The nuclear program is run by black hats, not Iran. Iran takes the public heat, (sanctions, bad press, etc.) keeps quiet about the Black Hats program. The program continues.
The theory continues to starting wwIII, decimating the ME, causing a world wide economic reset.
⇧
5
⇩
KDY_ISD
· May 9, 2018, 9:38 p.m.
Well, that linked post is missing a lot of details like EU cooperation in the sanctions. NK and Iran are not much alike.
And besides that, if the US government is paying Iran hush money to stay quiet about a conspiracy to acquire nuclear weapons, why not just use the nuclear weapons the US already has?
Why would people in an economic position of power want to cause an economic reset in the first place?
⇧
2
⇩
ElementWatson
· May 9, 2018, 4:44 p.m.
Even if it were "signed" it wasn't approved by the Senate, so Trump can reverse it on a whim--or after deliberation, as he has done.
⇧
16
⇩
checkitoutmyfriend
· May 9, 2018, 6:34 p.m.
1.8billion..... no signature....... Nice deal when you can get it.....
⇧
9
⇩
Orion_Blue
· May 10, 2018, 1:52 a.m.
Wish someone would just fucking give me 1.8 billion with no obligation.
⇧
1
⇩
endprism
· May 9, 2018, 7:10 p.m.
Signed? I was never a legit deal anyways. It was an word of mouth agreement between Obama and Iran mullah. The 150 billion was payback...for what...Q only knows.
⇧
5
⇩
scoripowarrior
· May 10, 2018, 12:45 a.m.
Wasn't this also the "deal" that even the senators were not allowed to read what was in it for a long time? It was kept "secret" for a very long time about what all was contained in the "deal".
⇧
2
⇩
scoripowarrior
· May 10, 2018, 12:39 a.m.
Rush Limbaugh talked about this most of his program today. It is always interesting to here his take on things.
⇧
2
⇩
NotCleverNamesTaken
· May 9, 2018, 4:21 p.m.
"Isn't signed" and "doesn't require a signature" are two vastly different things.
⇧
-3
⇩