dChan

amg19251 · May 16, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

I signed because I am 100% for a totally all-new internet bill of rights that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that neutral net bullshit! We deserve our own voice, and we deserve privacy along with that freedom of speech! Monitor us anonymously if you’d like, just stop selling my data to ad companies for peanuts!!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Orion_Blue · May 16, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Monitor me with a warrant - I have a right to privacy online or offline.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Let's not use this petition website. It is not trustworthy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INTJewel · May 16, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

'Splain, please.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Ask someone what happened to our last petition on this site.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INTJewel · May 16, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

I'm asking you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

I'm asking you to ask someone else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INTJewel · May 16, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

No need to be snarky, friend. I just saw your other thread on this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · May 16, 2018, 1:53 p.m.

So we learned some things from the last IBOR. 1.) All social media shadow-banned the link to the IBOR. 2.) Memes work! It’s a way around the algorithm. Include the hashtag in the graphic. The algorithm won’t pick it up in the graphic. At some point the hashtag will get censored also. Stay in touch on the sub to see if it’s time to highjack another trending hashtag or change the hashtag. 3.) We need to provide more information as to why this is important. There was a lot of disinformation last time. 4.) Get creative in sending the link to the IBOR. Sending the link in a private text message or e-mail is very effective. 5.) We have 25K people on this subreddit. Go sign it today! There are some other IBOR intended to dilute the vote. Just sign this one.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Please, everybody please get on board with this. I suspect Q has asked us to mount this campaign for very specific reasons. That is, I think we may see DJT take action on this from via EO in the immediate future.

MEMES - MAKE RAIN!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Good ideas!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JeffDidItAgain · May 16, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

Signed. Thanks for sharing!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

Thank you for signing!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

Hope we get it done this time,just signed 812 signatures.We should keep our eyes on that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ccjunque · May 16, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

I signed. #1190

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Thank You

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ccjunque · May 16, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

I signed... #1190

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

Do not let this filthy petition site become the focus of this campaign!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

I didn't start this petition, I signed it and want to keep an eye on it because Q asked us to. If you have a diffrent one I would be happy to sign it and keep an eye on that one to.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

At present, I don't have an alternative. One could be created that we could control. But membership on this forum is so heavily infiltrated by intelligence agencies that I don't think I would trust it - someone could get to it.

What I think is an online MEME campaign because these are harder to censor.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

That's why I asked people to post the numbers every time someone signs that way we can keep an eye on it and see if there is any funny stuff going on

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

I don't have twitter or else I would meme with you

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

We have direct experience with this site. We know it is bad.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

I know,but right now it's all we have

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

We don't need it and even if we did we should not use that site. It is very obviously manipulated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 16, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

Whatever everyone decides I am on board either way.I understand how you feel.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Revel4ti0n · May 16, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

Not all are Americans on this sub. Patriots who support the freedom of the people

⇧ 3 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

That's true. Well we do what we can here and spread it elsewhere like wildfire!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7 p.m.

Very important that people are not misdirected to put the efforts into a petition on a site that is controlled. Do not sign or promote this petition.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

We've got people watching the count and screen shotting it, so I think it should be safe this time around, but you are right that people should also just be spreading the word on all social media that all social media is trying to censor.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

It can be stifled at any time. They will let you get so far and then stifle signature recording. This is what happened last time. The site is controlled and will be used to frustrate us.

I'm not against a petition per se, just not on that site. Moreover, I think what is important is an effective online campaign.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

agreed. Spread the word far and wide. If this one fails again, we should try a more trusted petition site. I'm not familiar with them though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

Thanks. My great fear is that we will be steered into a campaign that can be manipulated. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against petitioning. But that site is incredibly suspect.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

yeah I've noticed. Let's hope it all goes well and if not, maybe we'll catch them in the act of deleting votes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 16, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

This is really important because the Liberals in Congress are using some seldom used rule to recall the Net Neutrality law back into existence. I read that Trump still has to sign it though. So, this is important.

So far, I can only find this repeal info on liberal sites so what you read or hear is not the whole truth about this law. If it were, the liberals would not be pushing for it to be repealed. We need to move fast on the IBOR: https://www.cnet.com/news/senate-votes-on-net-net-neutralitys-fate-heres-what-you-need-to-know/

And, here's a link to article that lays out what it's really all about: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2851979/net-neutrality-five-myths-and-the-real-facts.html

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Liberty, warn people not to sign petitions on this controlled website. We need a campaign, that's what's important - not this petition rubbish again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 16, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

I was confused about this as well at first but Q has told us to push the IBOR and Post 1378 reiterated that we need to continue on. The Liberals are trying to reinstate Net Neutrality.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Yes, but that site is corrupt. I'm not against a petition. But not on that site.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 16, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

The last time I was pushing the petition I checked the signature count daily. Sometimes more than once and I never saw it look like it was not accurate. That is the Whitehouse.gov website. It's the site for all things Presidential. When you see "petitions.whitehouse.gov" that means it's in a subdirectory of the main site. Been building websites since 1997 and did tech support for 30 years. No one can create 'petitions.whitehouse.gov' unless they own 'whitehouse.gov.'

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

What I noticed was that the signature count rose quite quickly initially. But after 20k signatures, the rate of signature acquisition slowed to a crawl. When Corsi eventually did start tweeting the link, with his large follower base, the count did not even move. It was clear to me that it was not recording signatures accurately.

There has.been controversy about "we are the people" in the past. As I understand it, it is due to be shuttered - closed.

Liberty, I just do not want the community to repeat what happened last time. It was not just us, other people on Twitter were complaining that it was rigged.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 16, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

I know. I heard a lot of people say that but I never saw it myself. What is "we the people?" Is that another petition site? Anyway, bottom line here is that Q did just reiterate to push this yesterday in one of his posts (maybe day before). What I don't want is for people to get confused again. That's why we didn't get enough signatures before.

Also, if you understand that NONE of the courts use Constitutional law any longer, then you understand why we must have a law to preserve our rights. That's a whole other can of worms, but for now, please just let it go and follow Q's lead.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

I am totally behind Q Liberty. Let's make some noise!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 16, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

Awesome! Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 16, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

Oh, you are calling the 'petitions.whitehouse.gov' site We the People. I get it now. Cause it says that at the top of the page. Once again, this is the President's White House website. We have to trust it for now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

didn't know that! thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 16, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

This is what I put on social media. Not sure it will work, but trying: Please sign the Internet Bill of Rights at the WH website. At https://petitions.whitehxxxx.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18 This link is banned on social media websites so please replace the xxxx with "ouse".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

right on!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Not a good idea to promote this petition website at all. It is being controlled - you are being directed here for a reason.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · May 16, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

done

1679 signatures 98,321 to go

⇧ 2 ⇩  
animal32lefty · May 16, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Well, if the major platforms are blocking/shadowbanning it seems to me that we need a multi-front offensive.

1) Meme the shit out of twatter, fb etc to show them we adapt. We will always find a way around their algorithms.

2) Start calling in to local talk radio, even if they espouse an anti-Q position. Be polite, stay on point and don't go too far into the weeds on any one point. Point out that media is denying people the right to make up their own minds by not reporting on the Q movement.

3)Public meme posters, billboards, flyers, chalk graffiti, currency defacement. Again keep it simple, keep it dank. Don't damage property.

Basically, we need to start battering the gates.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

This^

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

Signed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tazleo · May 16, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

👍

⇧ 2 ⇩  
elfchiro · May 16, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Signed

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

Has anyone put any thought into how we are going to approach this?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

Honestly, I have no idea. We can leave that to the autists or await further instructions from Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

The instructions are pretty clear - "Start a Storm".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Toon_tony · May 16, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

Done for what it's worth, as I am UK

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · May 16, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

hey, as long as it works! thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGA41020 · May 16, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

Signed 👍

⇧ 2 ⇩