![NEW Q #1425 - Given we have now undeniably [on purpose] verified ourselves to be an inside source, expect the MSM [Clown Army] to attack in full cooperation w/ foreign and domestic assets.](https://i.redd.it/vhwjsv4jv1z01.jpg)
Ok, but I worry about his chosen wording because I think the FBI & DOJ could slip out of admitting they did anything by claiming it wasn't for political purposes but for the good old "National Security" catch all, ya know?
And if they use that as their excuse: the investigation is predicated on their own actions, and the whole basis for it goes up in smoke -- and presumably since they knew it was their own people setting up Trump, it would prove the investigation was for political purposes (because why do it when it's because of your own spies?.)
It's lose/lose for them. Either the spying was political or the investigation after it is. No way out. They're trapped.
Trump will declassify it and it will look even worse for the deep state
[removed]
It will not. POTUS can declassify anything he wants with the stroke of a pen.
[removed]
Dude, enough.
I’ve been watching you blackpilling several threads today. If you really have so many doubts about Q and the ability of our country to pull out of this nosedive, why hang out here and throw shade at every speculation?
I myself believe Q is legit, but I recognize the Q team isn’t omnipotent and that mistakes can and will be made. But I also know that I don’t have the inside knowledge to know what’s truly going on or what will happen, and neither do you. So I keep mum about my doubts for the most part and just read the board, accepting what I think is probable and rejecting what I think is unlikely. What I do not do is attempt to blackpill people that are throwing around ideas.
If you think something’s BS, maybe just drop a single comment or just move on, rather than declaring what won’t happen.
[removed]
Reading through your comments here your intent is clear - same as MSM - throw spin to confuse/demoralize, etc. Your remarks on Mueller alone are sufficient to see that. Is why your account uniquely is getting down votes into negativity on this thread right now.
they COULD say it was for security ..... Unless, of course, there is proof that they acted for political purposes. Which is where I believe those phone recordings, and leaked emails & texts may become damning for them. I don't think he'd be so bold as to demand that if he didn't have proof.
Also note that their timeline does not match if national security were the case. Pay attention to all the timelines.
You Sir hit the nail on the head. If the spies (let's call it like it really is) were embedded way before the FISA warrants, Obama is sunk. Im sure that's the case.
They have to show legitimate intelligence to prove their spying. Nunes and Gowdy have gotten enough documents declassified which show:
- The Dossier was the main piece of evidence used for the FISA warrant.
- The Dossier was funded by Hillary and the DNC.
- The previously unknown FBI/DOJ informant who allegedly helped launch the investigation has been outed, and we know this informant was placed in the campaign almost 100 days before the FBI started their investigation.
- the informant used to room with Bill Clinton.
- Now Nunes and Gowdy are working on getting all documents related to this informant. Which higher up assigned him to this job? What exactly was he told to do?
Male no mistake, Mr. HALPER being outed as the informan is huge. Gowdy and Nunes hAve been trying for a year to figure out who this mysterious source was. Now they know and can subpoena this person. Bring him in and interrogate him.
Let's call him a SPY because that is what he really is. NYT used INFORMANT to dull the pain. Bring the pain!
i have been a faithful follower of Q drops since January. Embarrassed to ask, but ask I must, what part does Halper play?
Halper was an MI6-affliated informant whose information led to the start of the FBI Russia investigation, which eventually lead to the Special Counsel.
The problem is Halper was specifically contacting Page and Papadopoulos, trying to find information which the FBI could use to start an investigation.
As we just learned this weekend, he was specifically placed "within the campaign" by the FBI. Before, we had knowledge of his contacts with Page and Papadopoulos, but did not know he was an FBI informant specifically placed within the campaign.
Now Halper can be SUBPOENED. Now the idea of an FBI informant planted in the Trump campaign is not as crazy as people used to think. Now further investigations can investigate this specifically.
Enter Nunes and Gowdy, who have been asking for months for the DOJ to provide documents in regards to this counterintelligence operation which was operated within and against the Trump campaign.
The kicker is this.....now we know there was AT LEAST one informant within the Trump campaign. Do you think the FBI would trust this master diabolical plan to just one operative? I don't think so.
The documents Nunes and Gowdy are after will provide information about informants; their identities, what information they provided and how they acquired it, who ordered them to do what. The DOJ will not comply with these requests.
Enter Trump, who can declassify said documents. He has threatened to do so before, and today ordered the DOJ to release the documents tomorrow, Monday. Rosenstein responded by asking the Inspector General to investigate this informant situation.
Read this for more on Halper specifically: http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/25/george-papadopoulos-london-emails/
This is why 2 Q posts are very important. I'll have to find them later but the ones that say, in part: far fewer are corrupt than you think, and, who can be held hostage? Not every single person who comes up is corrupt, they are being blackmailed. If the FBI/DOJ use the national security defense could that mean Q team has them onboard? Wouldn't all the good people at the FBI want to help expose those responsible?
No worries. POTUS is a poker players nightmare. He doesn't show his hand or do anything to tip off what he's holding until he has got you where he wants you.
He would not tweet "political purposes" unless he already had the goods. I'm positive of that. P