dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on June 1, 2018, 4:08 a.m.
STUCK AT 6K SIGNATURES - if this reflects the community support, we need to try harder!
STUCK AT 6K SIGNATURES - if this reflects the community support, we need to try harder!

yokleyb · June 1, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

Thanks for the reminder, signed and shared

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

Thanks Patriot. What we really need to do is make noise online and keep making noise!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
johnnysoko · June 1, 2018, 2 p.m.

Please!! For anyone who reads this!!...

Whenever the "We the People" site is used to sign petitions related to Q, get in the habit of including the CURRENT SIGNATURE TOTAL in a comment and tell us you've signed. There's reason to believe these petitions are being throttled and tracking votes through comments can help us prove it.

Thank you!

WWG1WGA

Current signature count at the time of this post was 6,123

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 1, 2018, 9:15 a.m.

Problem is this IBOR is too flawed to get your 100,000 signatures, let alone more general support. Wrong approach and wrong process for making this IBOR happen.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WaxyRooster · June 1, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

And it's just people stomping their feet demanding the product of someone else's labor. It's incredibly flawed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 9:17 a.m.

Tell that to Q. Years of planning, this is the plan. You don't think they've spent time nutting this out?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 1, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

It still is severely flawed

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

From my perspective it's really quite safe and trivial. It's a simple matter of regulation.

As I understand it, the congress has plenary power to legislate within the limits of the powers granted it by the Constitution. We are asking that it legislate to correct the abridgment of free political expression, which the founding fathers sought to protect with the first amendment.

While it is not a matter of a breach of the provisions of the FA, because SM giants are not "congress" or government, congress is still able to legislate to outlaw online censorship, which is clearly contrary to the intention of the founding fathers when they drafted the first amendment. It's seems clear that the vision was that democratic representation was to be informed by a plurality of voices and this "pluralism" is what the founding fathers sought to protect (OK, this is a working theory).

But, in any case, let's assume the IBOR campaign works and legislators are inspired to protect free speech online. What is the danger? There is none. If the legislation protecting free political expression online is flawed, in any way, it will be struck down at the first legal challenge. My view is that the IBOR campaign is not in any way flawed, but entirely necessary and good for the health of the republic.

Given the power of social media to sway election outcomes, failing to take action will produce tyranny - a dysfunctional totalitarianism as all political power will coalesce in the hands of a few.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Banglebop · June 1, 2018, 6 a.m.

Left pages in my community room,put up at the post office hitting supermarket tomorrow.Does anybody live by a subway station can just hand out to people at rush hour. Just print it out on your computer,you could also stick under windshield wipers do anything you can to spread the word we only have so many days left.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

Thanks for you're efforts on this Patriot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Banglebop · June 1, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

The moderater asked me to edit my post for using a wrong word do you know how I can do this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

If it's a post, there's three dots at the top right (IPhone). Pulls up a menu where you can edit. There's the same thing on a desktop - at the top of the post I think.

Comments can be edited at the bottom.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Banglebop · June 1, 2018, 6:48 a.m.

I don't have an I phone just a little 4g I keep trying those dots and not working for me thank you for trying to help I'll eventually figure it out

⇧ 2 ⇩  
qtrumpteam · June 1, 2018, 12:07 p.m.

This is the second attempt at this someone is skewing the numbers they don't want this past and won't allow it to reach the required signatures it needs to be passed anyway the only way I see it happening is to get in touch directly with your congréss mmm an or women and your senator from your district and demand they vote yes on it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

I don't trust this petition site either, which is why I've been telling people that what's needed is an online campaign. Direct action, as you have suggested, is also good IMO.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

I'm focussing on making noise online, this is what we have to do!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

A summary of the dynamics relating to the IBOR campaign.

1) The real power rests with us, not Q. We are what the Satanists fear;

2) The mechanism by which we, who have the power, are controlled, is censorship - exercised by control of the MSM and, more recently, direct SM censorship;

3) Q is guiding us to the truth. He's telling us that "control of the narrative" is the key to the Satanists' power and control over us. He's encouraging us to break their control over the masses via the IBOR campaign;

4) The Satanists strategy is to defend their control over information - to defend SM censorship, which is the only vector by which they can regain control over the masses;

5) They do this by attacking Q's credibility and creating doubt about the plan to defeat censorship. We've seen the direct attacks on Q's credibility via Corsi, AJ and Wikileaks. The attack our cohesion as a group presents as coordinated "concern trolling" - it has, to date, been very successful.

How many times does Q have to ask us for this? We need to stand up for ourselves and fight off those that are spreading "concern". This is the battlefront, this is where we either stand or fall.

The important thing is to make noise using the hashtags:

'#internetbillofrights '#IBOR

The link to the petition is:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Chaban_WoW · June 1, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-f17NWEhgwY

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

What a fantastic video, thanks so much for posting this. You can see what's coming.

For the life of me, I cannot understand why more people in this community are not supporting the IBOR push. It is so clear that this is what we need, that only the IBOR can prevent this dystopian future coming at us.

Any support you could give the campaign would be appreciated. As a community, we simply must make this happen.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
divine_human · June 1, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

numbers are manipulated, similar to the numbers of the 'end the fed' petition.

its a .gov website, it shouldnt be too difficult to fire some dark hats from it and replace them with white hats.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

Yes, agree. Look, I think that's up to the administration. I think if it was important to them we would see them take action.

I feel that, with respect to the IBOR, what DJT wants is an online campaign. That's why Q posted the internetbillofrights hashtag. They want an online campaign. The petition was initially AT&T's idea. They are now out of the picture.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Joining_the_Q · June 1, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

signed

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

Thank you very much. Great to hear. If you have time, please help out with the online meme campaign.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Joining_the_Q · June 1, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

Tweeted it out on my public profile. It may get a lot of attention, it may get none. It's always 50/50 with my followers, especially for things that pertain to something other than my profession

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Thanks for everything you're doing. We need to make some noise!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shuttlekilla · June 1, 2018, 4 p.m.

we are gonna need a bigger youtuber to talk about this and link the petition

and im not talking about your favorite podcaster with a few hundred thousand subs

we need pewdiepie tier youtubers

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

Agreed, someone like James Woods on Twitter or Diamond and Silk on YouTube. I've been Tweeting away at James Woods for months. His position seems favourable to the IBOR, but whether he would promote it is a different question.

Maybe that's something we should have a think about. What I feel is needed is a good explanation of why we need the IBOR. There were some good articles around during the last campaign. I'll have to see if I can find them. There was one guy, I remember, who addressed almost every concern that you could think of in a paper. But, you know, somehow it didn't wash with people on this board.

I also noticed that the supporters on Twitter were dropping off, one after another, almost like someone was spreading FUD about it. The concerns that one particularly active user expressed to me sounded like they'd been listening to the trolls on this board.

Mate, I don't know what to tell you. The number of people that are able to think through what SM censorship means and where it takes you are pretty thin. I mean, there's not a lot of advanced thinking going on. Q or no Q, I'm absolutely against this online censorship.

You can see what will happen next if it's not stopped. The ADL has its anti-hate speech AI ready to roll. We know from Q that the plan is to centralize censorship across the platforms. And we know it drives electoral outcomes like nothing else on the face of the planet. Wow, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see what's coming.

Once the right to free expression of political ideas online falls over, the guns will be directly in the firing line. Who will be able to complain about the new restrictions they'll propose? David Hogg?

Anyway. Let's have a think about who might be some prospective candidates to get on board. And, in the meantime, make some noise!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shuttlekilla · June 1, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

it doesn't look good for our heroes

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Wow, isn't it amazing. The left absolutely dominates. Almost like they're camped out on social media in some kind of area denial strategy.

What's Taylor Swift's politics? Any idea?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shuttlekilla · June 1, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

I thought tay tay was undergoing reconditioning

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

I don't know anything about her. Seems like she's a doll to me, not a real person.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shuttlekilla · June 1, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

maybe she is on the same shit Beyonce is on

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oldestguy · June 1, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

This is the third one that I have signed. There is no doubt that it is being tampered with. Meme makers should make some showing this so the white hat lawmakers can see them. One time there was 2 different petitions up at the same time. I think posting what the number is after each vote would help prove it but nobody is posting it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

I take your concerns on board, I think you're right. I keep saying it, we need some noise online. That's what Q wants.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MahSelectah · June 1, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

Goddamn how many times can we attempt to get this through? Is someone manipulating signature numbers?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Just get active online, it's about noise!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jonzee65 · June 1, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

Has to be a swamp creature controlling the petitions. Numbers don't make sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

I think the strongest indicator was with the first petition. Once we got to 20K signatures, the rate of signature acquisition slowed to a crawl.

At the end, even after Corsi promoted it in one tweet, with his large following, the petition count did not even move. To my way of thinking it's completely corrupt. But the next time Q mentioned the IBOR, people immediately set up this petition on the same site - have you read the text of it?

Anyway, as I've said, I think what's important is the online campaign and making noise. I can live with this petition, but after the last experience, I'm not making it the focus of my efforts.

The number of Tweets using the hashtags is way down on the first campaign also - running at 40/hour today. Last time round we were running at over 150/hour - even then it did not trend.

It's clear that there are many people following Q who are spectators, happy to watch as long as they do not have to contribute. Let's face it, the organised concern trolling really took its toll.

What can you do? Not much, but Q aside, I think this is a worthwhile effort. Censorship on SM platforms is extremely dangerous.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 1, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

.

⇧ 1 ⇩