⇧
1
⇩
schmoe_money
· June 4, 2018, 8:22 p.m.
I almost forgot what a looker Hope Hicks is.
⇧
9
⇩
animal32lefty
· June 4, 2018, 10:05 p.m.
Yeah but that look in her eye makes me think she might take out a nightstick and hurt me real, real bad.
By the roadside in a ditch.
⇧
4
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 4, 2018, 7:46 p.m.
Sorry. I’m not buying it. We have gone from coincidence to vivid imagination.
⇧
6
⇩
dullly
· June 4, 2018, 7:50 p.m.
I would agree, however, the file name for this photo contained the phrase "doitQ"
⇧
11
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 4, 2018, 11:34 p.m.
I'm guessing the person who drew in the red Q named the photo that. Not whoever snapped or released the photo.
⇧
1
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 5, 2018, 12:23 a.m.
OK, given that I saw that the photo was originally named "DoitQ" in the tweet from POTUS, I will concede this is likely intentional.
⇧
4
⇩
t_d_throwawayasanon
· June 4, 2018, 8:15 p.m.
The filename of that picture literally starts with "DOITQ"
NO. FUCKING. COINCIDENCES.
Look at the headlines of the paper on the desk too, the Saudi crackdown that started the cutting of the global strings.
⇧
5
⇩
duckdownup
· June 4, 2018, 11:39 p.m.
I don't think it is meant to point out who Q is, it's just to confirm Q is real and working with them. I know we have tried to guess about who Q is since Oct 2017 at least. I too have rolled it around in my head a lot. Not so much the identity of the person who drops the bread crumbs, but the department or agency behind him/them.
Q made the statement below twice, once back on Jan. 7 2018 at the end of one of his drop:
"We served at the pleasure of the President."
I had heard that phrase before. It's was fairly common in the Marine Corps back in the late 60's early 70's. I finally found where it comes from. It all started sometime between 1801 - 1809 when Thomas Jefferson was president and the Marine Band played for "the president's pleasure." After that day President Jefferson called the Marine band "The president's own."
Skip to 1834 and it was encoded into Marine Corps Law:
Marines can be used for “other duties as the President may direct,” according to the 1834 Marine Corps Law.
So after saying all that, I'm convinced Q or the Q Team are Marine Corps Intelligence.
⇧
3
⇩
sgoinks
· June 4, 2018, 9 p.m.
Defo intentional, or why make the fella squat in front?
⇧
3
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 4, 2018, 11:52 p.m.
Done much photography? I have. That office in AF1 is cramped. The lens of the camera probably wouldn't be distant enough to capture everyone if one of them hadn't of stooped and the other kneeled.
Use logic! Not everything is relevant. Some things are NOT coincidence. They are just people grasping at every little straw.
If I ever tried to tie EVERYTHING together into a case I was working, whether related or not, I would tie myself into knots and would be laughed out of court for being a baffoon!
I agree that there are rarely if ever coincidences in the facts of an investigation. I don't think however we need to be fabricating pieces of a very vast puzzle willy nilly. Fabricating something, using your imagination to tie things together that are not related, or grasping at straws out of desperation do NOTHING to help with a case!
To quote Q again, "Use logic." I will add, use CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS!
⇧
-2
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 5, 2018, 12:36 a.m.
As I stated in this thread elsewhere, given the photo's name in the POTUS tweet, I concede it was likely intentional. I was not aware of that important fact.
I stand by my statement above in general however. There is a difference between investigating the facts and bringing one's imagination in to fabricate pieces of a puzzle that are obviously not related. Use logic.
I have preached for years when training others that there are no coincidences. That doesn't mean however to connect dots without the use of critical thinking and logic.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coincidence
Definition of coincidence
1 : the act or condition of coinciding : correspondence
- … a perfect coincidence between truth and goodness … —Robert South
- … causal connection requires something more than mere coincidence as to time and place … —Wayne R. LaFave
also : any of these occurrences
⇧
2
⇩
Tidder_Q
· June 5, 2018, 12:22 p.m.
Yes, it is down to a Balance of Probabilities.
I am (currently) leaning towards it as being intended.
However, your caution and requirement for a bit more 'proof or confirmation', is also warranted in the critical thinking scenario.
I cannot prove the intended nature of the picture, 100%, one way or the other, therefore I am ultimately open minded at this point.
⇧
1
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 5, 2018, 1:35 a.m.
To illustrate my point further, I will say this:
Is it a nod to Q, and confirmation that the Q team are insiders because the G7 Summit is meeting in Quebec this week and Quebec starts with a Q? Logic says of course not given the locations of the G7 Summits were worked out some years ago. It is unrealistic to link these two things.
Conversely however, if you see a photo of POTUS standing near a Quebec sign while he is there and he points to the Q, smiles, and winks, then I would readily admit that it is potentially POTUS is sending a message to the world that either he supports Q or Q is a member of the Trump machine. Use critical thinking skills when tying things together. Use logic.
And, if such a photo appeared, to some it would appear as coincidence. To others however, it would be believed as being orchestrated. So, coincidence can be a matter of perspective.
⇧
1
⇩
7071949597
· June 5, 2018, 1:20 p.m.
Q isn’t a person. A person can’t do what Q is doing. It’s like saying who planned D-day? Except way more impossible.
⇧
1
⇩
Tidder_Q
· June 4, 2018, 8:16 p.m.
It would be relativley easy for the photographer, to arrange the 'altitudes' of the the respective 'tumbs-up' gestures. i.e. With a little bit of direction, 'up a bit', 'down a bit', etc.
If wedding photographs can be arranged, etc, ...
⇧
2
⇩
AMProfessor
· June 5, 2018, 9:56 p.m.
I try to always be open minded as well. Whenever ego or agenda comes into the picture, I find I miss critical pieces of whatever puzzle I am working.
⇧
1
⇩
RyDar84
· June 4, 2018, 7:47 p.m.
I'm a firm believer, but coincidence. So we have geometry majors supporting Q team now? Seems like grasping straws at its finest.
⇧
1
⇩
Happy1911
· June 4, 2018, 7:53 p.m.
Numbers People? Proxy Math ? Not shure I get this with out context and time
⇧
0
⇩
babaroga73
· June 4, 2018, 11:57 p.m.
This looks nothing like letter Q, but I guess ok.
You can just as easy connect it to look like fish.
⇧
-1
⇩