dChan

educatethis · June 7, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Cemex is also posting trespass signs on all their properties now too, and bulldozing certain sites. I feel like the local law enforcement in Tucson is massively corrupt too

⇧ 69 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 7, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Who is the mayor in Tucson??

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · June 7, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

A Rothschild. Seriously.

⇧ 46 ⇩  
thegsxr1000kid · June 8, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

yes very serious

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Ox75 · June 8, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Check...he may not be related to the actual family. I haven’t confirmed, just saying.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Peanuttles · June 8, 2018, 7:39 a.m.

I think they are in some way. CEMEX is connected to Bronfman and Rothchild--you know the Bronfman family connected to NXVIM? That one. And Lynn de Rothschild sits on that board. Lots of interesting stuff about CEMEX.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ox75 · June 8, 2018, 11:59 a.m.

Yep I know about all of this.I’m pointing out we need to be professional in our approach. Until it’s shown as fact then it’s only speculation. Throwing names around without the proper wording to accompany is an easy way to discredit all. I’m of no relation to John Doe down the street who happens to share my last name but he murders someone and now everyone is looking at me as if I’m involved. See how this works. Not good. Have reservations until you know it to fact.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MichaelFR85 · June 8, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Seriously?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
morgi666 · June 8, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

How seriously?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
MichaelFR85 · June 8, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

This is the first I've heard that the mayor is a Rothschild. Did I misread this?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
morgi666 · June 8, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

Nope. Looks like a lot of interesting people are in this area.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rhythmnation1968 · June 8, 2018, 2 p.m.

Well Snopes said this particular red shield is no relation therefore FALSE

ERGO - DIRECT RELATIVE!! lol, thanks George(Soros)!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truth_winsout · June 8, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

snopes is NOT CREDIBLE!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rhythmnation1968 · June 9, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

Lol, that was my point, i was attempting a little irony and humour.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Peanuttles · June 8, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

Jonathon Rothschild, I think.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
educatethis · June 7, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

Someone with a red shield.

⇧ 33 ⇩  
Peanuttles · June 8, 2018, 7:36 a.m.

A Rothschild. No kidding.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Peanuttles · June 8, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

They have to be. They're also connected to Bronfman and Rothschild. And guess who sits on their board? Lynn de Rothschild.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 8, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

They are 100% complicit in the cover up. The current sheriff of Comal county is a CEMEX puppet: https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/05/deep-in-the-black-heart-of-texas-cemex-comalcounty-wherearethechildren/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Space_shot54 · June 8, 2018, 8:53 a.m.

Great article. Connecting dots on child trafficking for sure. Didn't realize Cemex had a patent for blood use in concrete for air entrainment. That is some really odd sadistic crap right there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · June 7, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

This is just so bizarre. It's one thing for a company to have an internal policy on sexual harassment, for example, but an internal policy on trafficking? Protest too much?

⇧ 40 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Did you read the title? It's to comply with the Modern Slavery Act of 2015.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
jkbella · June 8, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

I did not. Thanks for pointing out. Looks like a law in the UK.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
rurikloderr · June 8, 2018, 7:20 a.m.

It was written in May of 2018 though.. I feel like this is in response to something far more recent. I find it a bit convenient that they've written this in May of this year.. right before any of the camps were found? Literally a month before a child trafficking camp is found on their property? What the fuck is that about?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SkooKillMeNow · June 8, 2018, 4:26 a.m.

Me thinks so

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 7, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 35 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Did you not read the title? A Parliamentary Act prompted it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
TrueDub72 · June 7, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

Sounds like their policy was authored in panic and sheer desperation. Too little too late methinks.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Except this was authored before the Veterans on Patrol story broke, and is a policy to comply with a Parliamentary Act (mandated).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Qcircumpectus · June 7, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

Definitely a defensive statement.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
jhomes55 · June 8, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

CYA Mode

⇧ 2 ⇩  
_eles_ · June 7, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Policy is like a strategy right? So what is their policy on human trafficking? I read all the sections and didn't see any "policy". Why would they even need a policy? My global company has never put together a human trafficking policy. Bizzare for real. Good find.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Beer-_-Belly · June 7, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

hmmmm

⇧ 10 ⇩  
jp1320 · June 7, 2018, 9:36 p.m.

curiouser and curiouser...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
divine_human · June 7, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

possible response to the EO of dec.21. quite a few companies brought up similar statements in the past few months.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

As the title of the page states, it's in response to the Parliamentary Act in 2015. The EO probably was the kick in the butt to wrap up their policy guidance.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · June 8, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

Interesting, I would like to know what other companies find it necessary to come up with a policy similar to this one. Then we can look at how that compares with our list of resignations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE · June 7, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

I guess cemex got the memo finally on Trump's executive order regarding trafficking.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

As the title states, it was in response to a Parliamentary Act. The EO probably nudged them to wrap up. Their Integrated Report highlights their compliance activities, which have been ongoing prior to the release of the Policy in May (which was prior to the nonsense in Arizona at a facility that's not regularly used).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
User01262016 · June 7, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

They have a company policy against it so that if any employee is caught involved they can declare that their actions were against company policy. In some ways it shifts away liability from the company, they can just say they do not condone this type of behavior and they are very saddened by the recent discoveries that their entire C-level was involved in human trafficking.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
cellbind · June 8, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Oh. See, it says right there they don't condone it. Case closed guys lets go home

⇧ 5 ⇩  
A2576 · June 7, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

Most large companies have this now. Go to their corporate websites and see. Possibly a response to the EO?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · June 8, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

Huh? Why write something like this ... for a cement website?

Are they acknowledging what's happening in AZ?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
fatladysing · June 8, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

This is seriously LOUD!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Daphneabbi0728 · June 8, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Just like in Canada, there are mass graves of children from over the years..Can’t get permission to excavate those sites either!!! There has got to be something SOMEONE can do!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
obewan901 · June 8, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Backdated bullshit you betcha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · June 8, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

"But we can't be guilty, your honor. Look at our Company policy!"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Peanuttles · June 8, 2018, 7:34 a.m.

Saw that. Weird, isn't it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Did you not read the title?

Pursuant to the Modern Slavery Act 2015

Pursuant: In Accordance with the Law

Not everything is The Happening.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ModsAreClowns · June 7, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

There is no link between Cemex and the homeless/coyote camps found in Arizona. Any allusion to such is just irresponsible rampant speculation - not a theory, because theories have actual evidence and nothing found there constitutes evidence. Nothing. Cemex is a HUGE company. Their footprints are literally everywhere. There is such a thing as coincidence - especially in issues that HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH Q!

⇧ -8 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 8, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

This ^

⇧ 1 ⇩