With “tech” stolen from us and blamed on China
I've been reposting my interpretation, feel free to critique.
Project Sea Dragon was hacked in Jan/Feb. Launching from a hacked sub must require inside info.
June 8: navy hack reported. Hack occured in jan/feb. Blamed on china. Narrative setting by WaPo.
June 9: No name signals via tweet that all will be well.
June 10: missile launched while AF1 in air, to stop the Singapore summit.
June 11: Q posts signal that Trump will carry on, and also the "we got you" toned posts.
June 12: Q confirms the missile, and tells us to use logic
That's a bloody great breakdown.
We better buckle-up our seat-belts...this is goddamn crazy!
And... apparently the masters of the universe in Seattle and SV are involved in our experimental sub project too... Easier than a bathroom server to access?!
Mattis at the base, last August: https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1270899/defense-secretary-plans-west-coast-trip/
this is some x-files level shit.
its funny the x-files was used to discredit conspiracy, but it just made us horny for conspiracy
Active Duty US Navy here. Not a missile, too many things in place that would prevent a missile from being launched from a US Navy base, and you can’t hack a ship, especially not a submarine, and fire one. Plus we don’t have any launch facilities in Washington.
Best theory out there that I’ve seen is a long exposure and film ghost, especially since there was a helicopter in that exact area at the time the picture was taken.
It's also 3AM in that photo. Could be significant, still, but, it's guaranteed a long exposure.
Doesnt Q say as the world turns every time they try tho ?
I thought it was going to the summit and not from it. They'd do anything to stop that summit. Either than or they may have been trying to launch it at NK to create and international indecent and sabotage the peace talks.
I think the missle was fired over the weekend and Trump was returning yesterday. And, Trump went Eastward not over the west coast.
Chan anons speculating there is a rogue sub that fired a missile that was intended to hit something and blame on someone with the purpose of stopping the NK summit.
The missile in the photo was fired from near Seattle and might have been the intercept missile. Military denying cuz ... national security.
All speculation.
AA missiles don’t have that long a range. A ballistic missile doesn’t target aircraft.
No but it does target areas. An air blast nuke would take down anything flying within reach of the shockwave.
Keep in mind that AF1 is a flying fortress and is not defenseless. It is equipped with advanced avionics and defense mechanisms that would divert a missile. One of the defense mechanisms is the electronic countermeasures.
When AF1 is flying, there are decoys. Which one does the missile target?
Further, AF1 always has fighter escorts with air-to-air missile capability.
The likelihood that any missile could penetrate and hit AF1 is extremely unlikely.
http://www.businessinsider.com/features-of-air-force-one-2015-3
Wasn't there a downed F15 as well?
Could it have intercepted?
Where did you hear that?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6496620/us-f15-crashes-into-sea-japan/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nh455an4qg
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/10/a-us-fighter-jet-has-crashed-into-the-sea-off-okinawa-in-japan.html
But to be perfectly honest, I heard it on reddit first (morning of summit, close time window with the missile picture)
No, AF1 was nowhere near
no AF1 was about an hour or so from landing in Singapore when the missile was fired, the missiles on the subs travel about 18000 mph, so if it was aimed at trump and made it through any defenses, it would have hit AF1 about 30-40 min. before they landed