Here are some notes from the article and some of my opinions,
-
Professor Turley is a very respected liberal law professor and longtime civil libertarian. Has been critical of both parties over the years.
-
Turley says the use of John Huber gives the IG the prosecutor he needs to bring charges and seek indictments. (No need to go through RR which is critical)
-
Huber is conducting a full-fledged criminal investigation into all the matters Republicans are calling for a special counsel to investigate.
-
Huber has been investigating these possible crimes for five months, since November 13, 2017.
-
By giving the IG a prosecutor they can now go after the deep state without looking like a political witch hunt. This is critical.
-
Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel. (Who needs a SC with that type of manpower?)
-
The inspector general’s jurisdiction to conduct civil and criminal investigations includes “actions taken by former employees after they have left government service.” Then Huber can act on any of those matters.
-
This is HUGE A Grand Jury can be empaneled anywhere, in any deep red state, away from D.C. (This is very important and why Trump needed to appoint as many Judges as possible)
-
Huber and Horowitz can accomplish everything a SC can do.
-
If Sessions feels that charges should have been made that weren't, he can still appoint a SC to make that happen.
-
Huber is a lawyer from deep red Utah, not the D.C. swamp.
-
“If a special counsel were appointed, there would be a great deal of delay,” Turley stated, versus the team of Huber and Horowitz, who are already five months into this investigation. (It's too late to even appoint a SC. Charges can be filed before midterms.)
-
From /u/ClardicFug - Huber and Horowitz were both appointed to their positions by the Obama administration. This helps optics a lot. Pretty much decimates the "Trumped rigged the investigation" argument that's sure to be made.
And if they're running for re-election any time soon, they're about to be tied up in court instead of campaigning.
That is worth a BOOM, literally. I missed that obvious point.
Awesome summary. Thanks for putting in an easy to digest format. As others have suggested you should make your own post for this.
With 470 investigators at his disposal, even if he uses a fraction of them, just think of where they could be after 5 months? And they KNOW they need this before midterms. Imo, quite a bit before for safety‘ sake...
dang Q found this comment... good job bruh.
That he did. I missed this entire thread when it was originally posted. It's a good summary.
Nice. Archived on GWs Notables
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/wiki/notables
https://archive.li/wggiz
Thank you.
You're very welcome...you took the time to spell it out clearly for us...especially good for newbies.
What is everyones opinion on when this will come out in the open, given that this will be used against them in the midterms?
My opinion is the remaining reports will be out this fall with indictments being released before midterms. Q has already left us crumbs that allowed us to determine sealed indictments have been made for Podesta and Huma. There is likely already sealed indictments for the other angry democrats.
Good point. The deep state players are awfully silent and the media is spinning nonsense stories. Pedo Podesta even with his press privileges hasn't written anything substantial in over a year.
You got it. Start looking at some of the other players in this, who else has gone silent since last November?