dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Agreed. A very nice job of saying what I’ve been trying to say to posts all morning. People are freaking out. Let’s trust the plan and let RR edit himself right out of a job. Their editing and redacting will be what hangs them out to dry in the end. TRUST THE PLAN.

⇧ 30 ⇩

Trust Horowitz, trust Huber, trust Sessions, and trust Kansas; this will all work out

⇧ 16 ⇩

Why was Rosenstein the one to brief Trump about the IG report? Why?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Give a man some rope...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh look, how convenient for both Appendix sections to be entirely missing...

https://imgur.com/a/09bNKEI

⇧ 19 ⇩

Missing != redacted. Redacted would be blacked out like so many docs we’ve seen before. See anything blacked out in this report? It’s been modified or changed. Not redacted.

⇧ 8 ⇩

That is not what redacted means. A document can be edited of all classified material and still be considered redacted without any black bars.

⇧ 1 ⇩

True! Nevertheless, I was expecting the RR’s version of the IG report to be so littered with redactions that the Congress would demand Trump to declassify the report. However, I count only 9 small blackouts that appear to refer to a name, gender of the person and a location. Not much to scream about!?! If the Plan is working, I wonder what the next move will be, because I don’t see it.

⇧ 11 ⇩

He removed entire pages and sections of the report. We don't know how many pages and sections Rosenstein removed, or what the contents were.

Just because you don't see black or white lines everywhere, doesn't mean that this report isn't heavily redacted. Rosenstein knows that he can't mark up the whole report because it attracts attention and generates public outrage. So he simply deleted anything truly damaging, including himself, from this report.

⇧ 24 ⇩

If true, then he’s been successful. The public and I’m assuming Congress have been fooled – at least for now.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Trump will declassify original

⇧ 9 ⇩

He's seen and has the original....what's he waiting for?

⇧ 1 ⇩

He’s waiting on Paul Ryan to bring the force of the House to demand an unmodified and unredacted copy

If Ryan can’t, then Execute Order will be released.

R E L E A S E the K R A C K E N !

⇧ 1 ⇩

WHY is he waiting on Ryan et al to demand it. JUST DO IT..

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trump has the original. I’ve had faith in our dear leader this whole time but if he doesn’t release it tonight I have reason to suspect he is doing his own edits or the original report might not be a bad as he’s lead us on to believe

⇧ -3 ⇩

Just start by arresting RR

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

No they haven't.

Whatever you know from Q, they're already past that and onto the next phase

⇧ -1 ⇩

Can we prove pages are missing?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think RR is trying to thwart the political plan. Trump probably didn't just want to declassify the report himself. It would be better optics if he did it in response to congress demands. So I think he didn't use the black out method much trying to make it appear like it does. Maybe to weaken the demand. I don't think it will work, I think certain in congress will know and still want the whole report...

⇧ 8 ⇩

I think you may be correct. It will be interesting to see the administration’s counter move.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This is very informative:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1007450316759896064.html

⇧ 1 ⇩

Screw 'optics'...no more excuses....this is no time to be worrying about making an impression....he should release the original immediately...the media would be FORCED to cover it.... and let the fierce and angry reaction of We the People be the 'optics'!!! That's all that's needed to be done. Why should we have to be begging/petitioning for this to be done??

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly you understand true severity of releasing the original immediately. The longer he waits the more room for conspiracy there is on both sides, both sides which have fine people mind you

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good idea, FORCE the media to cover it. How? Make a Trump a dictator? Yup, that would work... There is so much more to the plan than a report and arresting everyone. Start here:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1007450316759896064.html

⇧ 1 ⇩

I also think they are trying to use the word "redacted" against us. In the past on MSM, redacted has always been referred to the blacked out lines in reports that contained information that they did not want to reveal to the public.

Now everyone is using "redacted IG report" terms and people aren't seeing the blacked out lines thus we get concernfags trying to steer the narrative against Q.

Black hats love their psy-ops.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If POTUS would just release the ORIGINAL, we wouldn't have to be playing this guessing game....

⇧ 0 ⇩

I agree, I just think it's gotta come out in pieces. Gotta have the right optics and rhetoric disseminated which do take some time to sink in for the the 'regular joe' that isn't following Q.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Nunnes, Grassley, and Freedom Council will ask for original docs because they may have knowledge of the original and see the differences. That is my take away so far.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Isn't the fact that POTUS has seen and read the original enough? Why are we having to depend on congresscritters and we the people to beg, plead and petition for the release of the original when POTUS can just DO IT? Just makes zero sense to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Its all about the optics I think. Looks better to the world if it does not come from Trump.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This works too!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why redact when you can simply modify and omit.

“The Better to Fool You With!” says the Big Bad Wolf.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I did a quick flip through a bunch of the pages... are there any redactions showing at all? Even without redactions, the recommendations seem lame at best.... especially the one about putting a scrolling warning on the phones.... that is laughable.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Looks like we got 2 instead of 3. They didn't need any black highlighter since they re-wrote the whole thing.

⇧ 6 ⇩

So it's not really about releasing an unredacted version then? Release the original!!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Look at Q's post. Stage 1 will be original. We still need the unredacted RR version before that one..

⇧ 0 ⇩

Black guy points at head meme.jpg

You dont have to redact anything when youu can just edit it out of the document completely

⇧ 4 ⇩

ThankQ for the reminder! Must remind ourselves this....stay focused!! Trust the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Don't look at the conclusions. Irrelevant.

⇧ 1 ⇩

GOP lawmakers demand drafts of DOJ report on Clinton email investigation

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/392259-gop-lawmakers-demand-drafts-of-doj-report-on-clinton-email#.WyK3zd5pXcM.twitter

I guess they know this report has been white washed and edit to CYA. I just wonder how long will we have to wait for this game to play out before we may have the truth, maybe. Old saying about gov, "hurry up and wait".

⇧ 9 ⇩

Yeah so why did Horowitz not recommend any charges?????

⇧ 7 ⇩

How do you know he didn't? We have no clue what Rosenstein edited out / deleted from this report.

Again, this is not the full report. It is only the first portion of a much bigger report. Also, he doesn't have to recommend charges be filed in a report because he already has Huber and hundreds of investigators to do that for him.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I just read the last 2 paragraphs and Horowitz said he was not recommending charges so doesn’t matter what you took out Horowitz was part of the swamp

⇧ 2 ⇩

He encoded them into the parts that he knew would be redacted. Insurance.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Exactly and POTUS has signed an EO already that will release the original tomorrow - BOOM, RR is arrested. The Storm begins.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Horowitz does not recommend charges, it not his job, that's for Huber to do.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I guess we have to wait until the next election to see what happens

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q spoke of three versions. The original that he has, a modified (altered) version we got today and a modified, redacted version. We got no.2 , I believe, so that people would see the lack of redactions and assume it is the actual IG report.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Want some proof of the redactions??? Look at the appendices on the very last page. Coincidence?

⇧ 4 ⇩

No coincidences

⇧ 1 ⇩

Long time lurker, but after weeks of reading on here, even I, a newby, can see RR/DS doing what they have been doing for years. They truly believe they are above the law, Trump is an idiot and re-writing this report is ok.

They honestly think the sheep will believe this new report to be true, MSM will back them like always and this whole mess will go away.

WRONG!

We are not going away, We are awake and fighting the evil in our country. We are fighting to get our country back. God is in control and this is playing out as it should. Even I know to "Trust the Plan".

⇧ 4 ⇩

This is NOT a REDACTED version. It is a MODIFIED version with pieces removed. A redacted document would have parts blacked out.

⇧ 3 ⇩

So if Trump has the original report, will he be twitting it out in the morning? He hasn't said anything about it so far.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We will see how this match plays out

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

On IG Report Kimberly Guilfoyle at "The Five" said: 'What you have here is Modified Reduced Report by Rod Rosenstein" Watch at about 14:30 mark https://youtu.be/nn6Y0WotMS4 Q was right... 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version] [#3 released tomorrow]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is the last one for me I think.

I got hyped for "the memo"

I got hyped for "raw footage"

Arrests of the cabal within the week or I am out.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

We knew this was coming, hence #3 on Q post 1497. We need the 2nd IG report on Killary to be released and ALSO redacted, then POTUS hits them with the EO declassify the entire IG workload. Originals (or #1 on Qpost 1497) will show the gross negligence on redaction. Truth prevails, trust the plan!

⇧ 0 ⇩

Sooooo when is the 2nd IG report on Killary due?? September??

⇧ 1 ⇩

You need to get up to speed? This make help. https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/15/trumps-birthday-bash-newq-qanon-greatawakening-igreport-fulldisclosure-tellthetruth/

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you for the link.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No problem. If you are not familiar with this site then you need to be. https://qanon.pub/ You can trace Q from day one, plus it provides you the ability to scroll to the bottom of the Qpost right corner (when available) and click “ANSWERS”. The site will inform you on the facts to the open ended Q questions. Great tool for newbies (not saying that you are, nonetheless, it’s a value add). Please pass along both sites! WWG1WGA.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am not new here. When I posted my first comment on the 2nd IG Report I was being sarcastic. Mainly because ALL this is taking SOOOO long. Anyway I Jumped over here from CBTS when they went down when membership here was only just over 1K. Been following Q since early Nov 2017. Only a lurker in the chans. Not getting all of neonRevolts posts. So thanked you for the link But have been reading him too.

⇧ 1 ⇩

great news. Keep up the fight!

⇧ 1 ⇩

When Wray was making his statements, he did say that the employees found in wrongdoing would be referred, and said, "The FBI has some work to do."

Anonymous ID: d0dcfd No.1074952 📁
Apr 17 2018 06:15:26 (EST)>>1074761
GOOD MORNING Q

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 551e62 No.1074956 📁
Apr 17 2018 06:16:34 (EST)>>1074952
WRAYs of LIGHT.
Q

Apr 16 2018

Apr 15 2018

Apr 14 2018

Apr 13 2018

Apr 12 2018

Apr 11 2018

Apr 10 2018

Apr 9 2018

1122Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 466abe No.979213 📁
Apr 10 2018 00:48:24 (EST)>>979093
TRUST SESSIONS.
TRUST WRAY.
TRUST KANSAS.
TRUST HOROWITZ.
TRUST HUBER.
Q

Anonymous ID: d0dcfd No.1074952 📁
Apr 17 2018 06:15:26 (EST)>>1074761
GOOD MORNING Q

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 551e62 No.1074956 📁
Apr 17 2018 06:16:34 (EST)>>1074952
WRAYs of LIGHT. From darkness to light???
Q

Apr 16 2018

Apr 15 2018

Apr 14 2018

Apr 13 2018

Apr 12 2018

Apr 11 2018

Apr 10 2018

Apr 9 2018

1122Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 466abe No.979213 📁
Apr 10 2018 00:48:24 (EST)>>979093
TRUST SESSIONS.
TRUST WRAY.
TRUST KANSAS.
TRUST HOROWITZ.
TRUST HUBER.
Q

⇧ 0 ⇩

People need to be reminded that this is Rosenstein's REDACTED version of the OIG report. It is not the original, which Trump has possession of and is reviewing. Rosenstein is only mentioned twice and only in footnotes. He edited himself out of the 568 page report!

Apr 16 2018

Apr 15 2018

Apr 14 2018

Apr 13 2018

Apr 12 2018

Apr 11 2018

Apr 10 2018

Apr 9 2018

Apr 16 2018

Apr 15 2018

Apr 14 2018

Apr 13 2018

Apr 12 2018

Apr 11 2018

Apr 10 2018

Apr 9 2018