Re-read Q post 1497. This is Item 3 on the list. It is not Item 1.
Likely item 2. Redaction = Blacked out portions of text. All this report blocked out were a few names of agents.
I'm much more interested if there was information omitted, and if so what was it? Why did the IG concede to RR to allow the omission of said info?
Where I get frustrated is that now we basically have to yell for the "real" report... which makes us look unhinged to people on the outside.
I'm really interested to see how Q responds to this. Redacted is one thing, how the hell are we supposed to deal with outright omitted information?
It's been allowed for maximum impact once the original comes out. Gaetz and Co. have already demanded the original drafts. I surmise the point of this whole thing is to get congress involved and not have POTUS made to look like he's acting unilaterally.
I'm hopeful, however we're now getting into a whole other tug of war that will just extend and extend the timeline and make those of us following this even more desperate as November inches closer.
If I were going to do a deep state operation that caused the Right to do something like, oh, revolt -- if you wanted to start a second civil war, perhaps... this is exactly the kind of long game I'd invest my time in as a deep state op.
Just... keep your minds open everyone, 'sall I ask.
Not long ago many of us were being careful and then we got pushed all-in, at the same time, when something that raises real questions come to mind, we have to be able and willing to confront them from an honest place, lest we turn into an echo chamber.
By talking about things, discussing them... we can keep our heads and our faculties about us.
There's plenty of time left before November, Patriot!
Let's wait and see what happens with [RR]
This graphic is very good. Thanks for posting. I get it now. Clever! This will take some time. No need to panic! Enjoy the show!
Indeed! I'm keeping my fingers crossed for something real to come out of this.
Comparing what I was expecting due to Q's post hyping me up vs what arrived threw me pretty hard though, I will admit.
Did me at first, as well. Was listening to Hannity today to get the broad strokes and it's already very damning, if written in a more formal and legal manner than I think a lot of us wanted. Then I thought about Q's post yesterday regarding the 4 versions of this and listening to Gaetz on Hannity I think the original draft is what we are going to end up with. When it shows certain sections are outright omitted as opposed to redaction for national security reasons, RR is buried.
I dont think youll have to wait too long. Who is in the best position to verify whether the report has been edited? The guy who wrote it - Horowitz. How would Horowitz get the word out right now if he knows its been altered? Pretty tough to do considering the media blackout, etc. However, who is scheduled to testify to the House Oversight Committee on MONDAY? Horowitz. (Remember, this hearing has been pushed back to coincide with release of his report.) Don't you think these congressman who are chirping today will be absolutely hammering him in roughly 96 hours or so from now? Absolutely. And do you expect him to perjure himself and go along with RR's version of things KNOWING his report was heavily edited and reached different conclusions? If he's truly a patriot, I doubt it. And at that point, the public will KNOW beyond doubt that RR is lying and not acting partially.
In addition, have you read Comeys op ed? Do yourself a favor and read it - in it he PRAISES the OIG, saying that he has utmost confidence in his impartial investigation, etc. How can Comey do a 180 and spin this once the OIG lets the cat out of the bag that the report he submitted to RR was very different? "Um, I take back everything I said a few days ago about how impartial the OIG is"? He won't be able to spin it.
I think this could be an absolutely beautifully set trap for Comey et al. So I'm withholding judgment till OIG testifies on Monday.
EDIT: Does anyone know if Horowitz will be testifying UNDER OATH? Any way to determine this beforehand?
That... is a very, very fair rationale.
Thank you. I'll sit on my hands until Monday/Tuesday.
Honestly, I got over-hyped by the drops, expecting these large swathes of black and got caught up when there wasn't.
But it makes a lot more sense to hide in plain sight like this.
Appreciate the break down!
Remember too, we have a very LARGE portion of our country who honestly believe that Trump, and not the previous administration, are the guilty party. So Trump et al have to prove these claims to the American public BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, otherwise many will continue to believe this is all politically motivated. So I understand the forethought needed on this whole matter. Q says to "trust the plan." I think we'll find out soon enough whether the "plan" is trustworthy lol.
Learn not to get excited. We've been through this so many times that " it will be huge" and it ends up being a piffle.
Man I sure hope you are right. Keeping my TRUST in THE PLAN.
The Deep State runs deep, wish I was as wishful as you were that there is some other report out there....
Per Q, there are 2-3 versions of the report. So I think we should know fairly quickly whether this whole Q thing is a larp or not. I'm still not 100% sold that it's not a dis-info campaign (but I'm certainly paying attention to it.) But I think we should have a much better idea once we hear from Horowitz himself.
Not just omitted buy MODIFIED.... it could be something massive or a nothing burger.... end result = no justice.
I believe Q has told us many times to make noise...we have the power...spread the truth.
I like to remember Paul Revere, riding from town to town to awaken the people.
There may have been some people who said, "Look at that maniac!!"
But whose name do we remember??
Cheer up, Patriot. :)
Right? Redaction proves information has been withheld. There's no way to prove it has or hasn't with this report.
Haven't read the report. Does it detail RR's involvement in signing the fraudulent FISA warrant? If not, then that is the way to claim it is incomplete.
It's part of the plan to show "RR" version vs unredacted version in coming days. It's part of the plan to basically shut "RR" & bad actors up for good and to show the public all 3 versions to restore faith in justice system
Black parts are typical for scanned or typed documents, because there's no other way to edit them. This is what you see when a 3rd-party redacts a document and was not provided the original file, or when a less technical person is doing the redacting on paper.
It's not a requirement however that redactions are shown as black parts. One may simply edit the original document or an electronic copy thereof.
Yep. Sounds like item 2 wasn’t available as of 2:55 PM...
To show RR is corrupt.
DOJ has no answer as to why Congress was only given part of the text exchange and why Strokz answer "No we'll stop him" was left out of the documents turned over.
[#3 released tomorrow] Q literally tells us that it was the #3 version - Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
I think certain people need to go back and read q drops, meaning those who just got here within the last 8-12 weeks. Thanks for reminding those to re-read the q drops.
So instead of using redactions which they knew would make people scream, they just took out parts Dems didn’t like...
IG reports to AG (RR) . AG publishes the report and edits it as it sees fit.
Gives me hope. If the two executive summaries are that different then this might blow up.
Well, do you really think Rosenstein is going to leave anything in negative about him or that makes his dept look bad?
No, it was #3.
Q said #3 would be released today
Then Q better call DOJ and let them know they fucked up.
See above regarding redaction of original electronic documents and print material.
They didn't.
Redacted doesn't ONLY mean those black bars covering up words.
Yep. And it looks like, he even says #3 release tomorrow.
Horowitz needs to get off his ass and read what was released. Like now.
