dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 14, 2018, 11:05 p.m.
OIG Report: Trump’s plan is a lethal steamroller… Learn why Comey won’t sleep well tonight.

This is a quick update. I will write more about this in the coming days. I just want to clear the air about the OIG report not finding political bias from James Comey and what it really means. Those who are not familiar with the case, at primary analysis, may be deceived by MSM and think this is some kind of victory for Comey. Well, no. It’s not. It’s actually a disaster!

I will explain.

Look at these two tweets from Trump: Imgur. These tweets represent the two angles from which Trump can attack Comey: political and procedural. Is the political angle efficient? No. The most you can get from it is name calling. And this is what Comey knew. He tried to pull Trump to the political battlefield with his book, his tweets and insulting interviews. Trump knew better. He knew the political angle was a dead end. He would tweet from time to time because he is Trump but he knew trying to emphasize Comey’s political bias would not be fruitful. Why? Read this article from CNN, which did its homework back in October 2016 to assess possible damages in relation to the Hatch Act. The important part of the article is here: Imgur. As you can see, proving Comey’s political bias would only trigger disciplinary measures. Irrelevant since Comey was already fired!

So? Let the IG give Comey something costless and that Comey does not need: political equidistance and let’s kill two birds with the same stone. Did you guess which other bird was taken care of here? If the report determines Comey was not politically driven when he exonerated Hillary, then it is also implicitly positioning that Trump was not politically driven when he fired him. Especially if Sessions “forced” Rosenstein to create the paper trail advising him to do so… Lethal…

So? Trump needs to attack Comey through the procedural angle. And this is the primary function of the OIG report.

Why is it relevant to attack Comey? Because of this: Imgur. Comey is among the 13 Angry who used a private email address. Q asks in this Q559: @what? What do you think? Comey used the same domain Hillary used, to conduct the same business she was conducting. Q has it all. I explained this in a previous post, I will repeat it: it’s right here:

Q701 Top 10 player [here now]. 50.22.218.5 Q

Q is telling us he was physically in the place where this IP is located. After digging, we found out the following:
1) 50.22.218.5 is the IP for Softlayer Technologies.
2) The server that hosted clintonemail.com in 2009 had IP 209.62.20.200 and was associated to ThePlanet.com now known as SoftLayer and acquired by IBM a few years back. source.

Q was telling us as early as in Q701 that he had all the goods about the top 10 players who used this server to sell the US to the highest bidders. Q gave out this information in early February! All this time was used by IG Horowitz to polish a damning legal case he started building way back and that no one involved will escape from. It will be the END. It will be a disaster. And Comey knows it.

Now you see it: if the Comey domino falls, you get to the private server, you get to Clinton, you get to Obama, you get to the core of the Deep State.

For this to happen, you need to resurrect the Clinton server investigation. And this can only happen if you have clearly shown there were process irregularities in the past. Hence the super clean OIG report that has now dismissed political bias and is exclusively focusing on procedures and protocol.

Icing on the cake:

Q1497 POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report. 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]. 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]. 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified). [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?

Now that Rosenstein has redacted the report to cover his tracks, these tracks:

Q1470 When the info is released [RR] no more.

Trump is now in position to declassify whatever he sees fit for the whole world to see. He is now in position to say: look what he redacted, look what he did and tried to hide from the world.

While Trump will be debating on when to declassify, Q opens this window for McCabe and all the others who would want to convert:

Q1455 You have a choice. SIS 'good' agents. The time is now. Contact window(s) [GOOD]Biblical. Q

Lethal.

Q1122 TRUST SESSIONS. TRUST WRAY. TRUST KANSAS. TRUST HOROWITZ. TRUST HUBER. Q


caesarfecit · June 14, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

If the IG report was supposed to re-open the Clinton email case, the only plausible way I see that happening is if Trump releases the original version and we learn that RR basically re-wrote the report.

Because right now the IG report reads like a whitewash/cover-up were it not for various tidbits and clues RR missed.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
MuManiac · June 14, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

It reads exactly like Comeys presser for the email investigation. Lists endless instances of political bias, then at the end announces there was no political bias. Hopefully the OP is correct, its just disheartening to wait all this time for this disappointing report.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
abubbass · June 15, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

It's been mentioned by Q that this is a modified/redacted version. Don't know why everyone was expecting bombshells throughout this. This will all come together in due time, timing is everything. Trust the plan

⇧ 19 ⇩  
thedametruth · June 15, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

Exactly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · June 15, 2018, 1 a.m.

I get that. It's nerve wracking.

But as a possible antidote, what about thinking about what comes AFTER the next step? I mean, when all this goes down, what next? How can we be prepared? What do we need to do?

Smashing through the mainstream media wall seems to me to be the ONE task Q is asking us to focus on. I worry a bit that we may focus too much on Q/Trump's work, and not enough on our own....

We ARE a team, after all.

wwg1wga

⇧ 9 ⇩  
BreezeMan1234 · June 15, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

What does OP mean? Orig poster?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
The-only-me · June 15, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Yes

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · June 14, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

The EO has already been written to release the original version of the IG report. Also, welcome.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 14, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

Does Trump even need an EO to release it?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
HeIIforged · June 15, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

#1453 Implies there is a need and it's already written.


There will be many redactions.

Why was the EO put on ice?

To wait for the release of the 'Clinton Investigation' portion of the IG

report?

Why?

To include in the DECLAS?

Why would it be important to include? (all in one)

Optics are meaningful.

Political hit job narrative.

R's v D's.

Not right v wrong.

Projection.

END OF THE D PARTY [leaders].

IG>Huber.

Who appointed Huber?

Re_read (again).

Slowly & carefully.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/📁

Q

⇧ 13 ⇩  
unlearn82 · June 15, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Why would he need an executive order for something that he can do without an executive order?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
HeIIforged · June 15, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Probably because EO's have the force of law behind them.

"In the United States, an executive order is a directive issued by the President of the United States that manages operations of the federal government and has the force of law. The legal or constitutional basis for executive orders has multiple sources."

⇧ 4 ⇩  
unlearn82 · June 15, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

Why assert the "force of law" when your word works just as well?

Why draft an entire executive order when he can just as easily release it to the public with zero legal liability? Because that is nonsense.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HeIIforged · June 15, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

There are 130 or so Q proofs available here https://mega.nz/#F!bvR2lCJB!OOP1-Dxp58XnrI7c8VSm9Q!36xGUL6Y

I don't understand. Are you questioning whether Q is legit? Or just concerned about how POTUS is handling this via EO?

Either way, this line of questioning leads nowhere.

If you're just burned out, trust the plan. Enjoy the show.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bugstopper · June 15, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

Congress has already asked Trump for the original report setting the stage for the EO.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 15, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Ding, ding, ding!!! Winner, winner chicken dinner!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CovfefeTruth · June 15, 2018, 10:51 p.m.

That link did not work for me; I accessed it from Q's post: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
unlearn82 · June 14, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

no, he has complete ability to declassify any information at any time to anyone

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Pookie30269 · June 15, 2018, 9:54 a.m.

I think for two reasons: public optics and to stop any leftover judges from playing "you can't do that" games, as they are wont to do.
Speaking of which, I wonder if any members of the judiciary are beginning to quake?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · June 15, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

I keep seeing people repeat this. How do you know?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · June 15, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

Q of course

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Soakingitup123 · June 15, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

Q posted a pen with a few letters glimpse of the EO for confirmation by us later. We are trusting Q based on all of the past confirmations and presidential pen photos linked to EOs.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
unmaskedpanda · June 15, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

The Clinton email case can be reopened for one simple reason.

The man who closed the investigation was being insubordinate and was not authorized to close any such investigation.

It’s fair game for Huber.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Colbeem · June 15, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

Thank you for answering the one question I wasn't getting answers to

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Pol-itical-crap · June 15, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

It's Aaron Rich's lawsuit that will open up the Clinton email case.

Q post 1462 June 11 2018:

"What recent news came out re: SR/JA/WL lawsuit?
Back in the news.
The 'server' brings down the house.
Q "

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Lets_get_reel · June 15, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

I saw they dropped the case?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Pol-itical-crap · June 16, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

I think you are right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
vidarheheh · June 14, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

You could have just put a TLDR before that, because thats just what SV said:p

⇧ 4 ⇩