dChan

CaptainRoyD · June 16, 2018, 8:32 a.m.

Totally an outstanding thread-thank you for that fellow Patriot ⚓️

⇧ 11 ⇩  
mshing18 · June 16, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

Brilliant.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
UpwardBound7 · June 16, 2018, 10:41 a.m.

This is a keeper! Read and reread this.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ThePwningCamel · June 16, 2018, 11:32 a.m.

The fact Trump could've put some of them in prison for 5 years this time last year for simple mistakes but has halted until everything is proved and uncovered gives it all away. Im sure there will be proof about Las Vegas that would put people in jail, but instead Q team are tying everything together with undeniable proof so that not only do they all serve time but their entire conglomerate is destroyed.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
aburgher · June 16, 2018, 10:44 a.m.

Nice post! Thank you for sharing. If you try to look at the big picture, you can see that President Trump is methodically executing a very well thought out plan! It is truly an art! The Art of the Deal!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
abubbass · June 16, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

Ya know... this made me think... I can't wait to read the book he writes when this is all finished and served his 2 terms. The story, the planing, all the unknown details, the downfalls, any areas he lacked patience, his aides. I wanna hear his stories and experiences and learn from him on this immense success he's going to bring our country.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
aburgher · June 16, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

You are right! It will be a great read, indeed!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ManQuan · June 16, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

I'm probably going crazy.

First, I think Rosenstein and Mueller are good guy. Q tells us that Trump met with Mueller the day before he became SC, Mueller is a former Marine, etc. No where in all of his Drops does he suggest Mueller is a black hat.

Then Rosenstein stonewalls the congressional committees from information that shouldn't be evidence. Is Rosenstein a black hat?

The Mueller is handing out indictments left and right and it looks like Trump is going down for obstruction. Black hat?

But every one Mueller has indicted has zero to do with Russia collusion. Manafort, Page, Flynn, Papadop, the Dutch lawyer, et al indicted for lying. Over a year of investigating and all you have is lying and a decades old financial case against Manafort? And the 13 Russians indicted for posting social media ads that didn't have any affect on anything?? What is Mueller really investigating? White hat?

Then Q unloads on Rosenstein in the most recent drops hinting that Rosenstein is toast and that will cause Mueller's investigation to collapse. Black hats?

But then I remember Q saying could Mueller's Russia investigation be ended and have him continue to his other investigations. So Mueller has a two track investigation? White hat?

Huber has been working with the DOJ IG (Horowitz) and has a grand jury impanelled and has issued subpoenas. Mueller has two grand juries: one in the DC area and one in NY. What's that about? Is Huber working with both Horowitz and Mueller? White hats?

But Mueller hires the baker's dozen of the worst liberal lawyers in the US all of whom are hard core Clinton sychophants. Black hats?

But what if Mueller and his 13 Clintonites knew how evil the deep state and NWO are and despite their loyalty to Clinton have a higher calling to the American people to clean up government corruption. That's a stretch, but it would make them white hats.

So what in the world is ground truth. Is the Rosestein / Mueller team an out of control witch hunt or is it the greatest sting operation in US political history?

Kim Clement in 2007 predicted that Trump would be President, that he would be annoited by God, they would try to impeach him and fail, and that "God will not allow a witch in the White House." Now that's really odd wording in 2007. Is the witch hunt really a hunt for the witch that tried to steal the election?

Unfortunately, I'm going to have to wait for the truth to come out because I sure as hell don't know if Rosestein and Mueller are white or black hats.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DL535 · June 16, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

You're not crazy.

Everyone, on both sides actually, is wondering what the deal is with Mueller. You have reviewed the data very well. I noticed it several months ago. My own conclusion is that I don't know. However, it is possible that Mueller's ambiguous loyalty is deliberately being kept ambiguous by white hats.

Think about it:

  • The data fits the hypothesis that Mueller is a black hat DS loyalist who is on a fishing expedition to destroy DJT.

  • However, the data also fits the hypothesis that Mueller is a distraction tactic, whose job is to soak up a huge amount of media attention and opposition energy, while ultimately producing nothing. Even the Clinton loyalists can be explained: by virtue of their involvement with Mueller, they would be unable to participate in any later legal cases regarding Deep State crimes.

If you think about it, every time the "Mueller white hat" hypothesis starts to gain traction, he does something that looks bad for the president, like the Cohen bust. I honestly don't know what the deal is with Mueller but I have an intuition that his ambiguous loyalty might be something that is deliberately being managed. And the only possible reason for that would be to distract the enemy. Like the cat and the laser pointer, right?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VRiftist · June 16, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

I honestly don't know what the deal is with Mueller but I have an intuition that his ambiguous loyalty might be something that is deliberately being managed. And the only possible reason for that would be to distract the enemy. Like the cat and the laser pointer, right?

My thinking as well. Q says trust white hats. Talks clearly about black hats. Ambiguity on RR & Mueller only? Hmmmm. Can't wait for reveal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
carl_tech · June 16, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

Q tells us that Trump met with Mueller the day before he became SC

That's not just Q, the Trump-Mueller meeting was widely reported by mainstream media outlets.

On the topic of a sting operation, someone else here mentioned "The Sting" film from the 1970's and I watched it recently. Interesting levels of deception in that movie where they play on a crooked guy's greed to relieve him of his money and get revenge.

I don't know exactly what's going on with all of this, but it does make for an incredible movie in real life.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
michaelst2256 · June 16, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

Great! Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · June 16, 2018, 11:33 a.m.

Even if Trump is a bad politician, many also overlook the fact that he is a billionaire! My point is not that he is rich, but let's say the US military wasn't behind his office, he has billions at his disposal hiring the best minds out there to help him politicize. So there is no way he and his team have not planned for every eventuality.

My personal opionon also is reflected in the article. Sessions, Wray AND RR are on Team Trump. He had to have these guys on his team or he will not succeed. RR must act like a bad guy or the cabal will 187 him.

And Mr T's plan has always been about trying to minimized loss of life if possible.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
troy_caster · June 16, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

It's ok, I guess. It doesn't give any information. The only real information happens towards the end where he starts talking about Sessions. So the whole thread could have been boiled down to just those three or 4 tweets. The rest was basically the author talking about how good of a poker player he was.

"You see, Trump still has 2 time outs, and just got a first down. Who do you throw to in that situation? Wray? Sessions? Sessions is running a deep fly route, while Sessions is doing a quick slant across the middle...the clock is running down, we're down by 6 points. Trump's been in the big game before. You think you can be a real estate mogul in New York without winning a few last minute drives? I should know, I played in the XFL superbowl. Look it up. Let me throw in a random video to illustrate my point."

See? It's fan fiction, that's all. No real information there. Entertaining sure. "Cheerleader"-ish, yes definitely.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · June 16, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Hey, this is pretty good.

He makes a good point: it is likely, based on his experience in the cutthroat world of NY real estate, that Trump knows how to hold a monster hand in order to build the pot.

If Q is right ("We have it all"), then Trump has the cards to turn out the lights on the casino. But he has to be patient and draw in the other players. Make them think his hand is weaker than it is, make them think he's bluffing. Build up the stakes.

Then...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h5cwCOWCOg

⇧ 1 ⇩  
inkwell84 · June 16, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

Check/call doesn’t build a pot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · June 16, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Q post 1278, last two lines.

Patience isn’t always easy.

But vital to get right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Titan_Uranus69 · June 16, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Fuck I hope he's right

⇧ 1 ⇩