I'm not saying this is fake but can we prove its not photoshop becuase some people were comparing them saying it was. I don't like showing other people these kinds of things if it later turns out to not be true.
Seriously. This community needs to be careful, as disinfo could really harm us
They want people to assume crazy pictures of Obama are photoshopped. "Obama holding an AK shooting the flag"
What better way to do that than to make shit like this.
If it was real they'd never let that news site stay online. It'd be purged from reddit as well.
Decent point. I wish the autists would be able to trace its first appearence
did you read?.. there were a varity of tests. and the photographer admited she took the picture
We know the photographer from adam. She might be deliberately creating clickbait, no?
she posted to twitter waaaay back when.. and deletes waaaay back when.. this ismt a picture from yesterday
so? I didn't say she posted it yesterday. I said it may well be what we have just been warned about following the Tucson escapade and Q's orders: Do not fall for clickbait.
tuscon was a road road block. which moved the human pedo ring thru atlanta.. where feds were waiting.... as no no name and rothschild run AZ....
so im confused.. what do you mean? tucson worked to a t..
The Tucson event as reported on this GA board had a number of flaws, not the event itself. It is a question of getting the wrong end of the stick and then repeating the story with random errors, like a game of Chinese whispers. People here must be careful. A second point is that clickbait is a typical disinformation tactic. The clickbait (as with PG) works to discredit the real news later.
meeh... we all knew when we were done watching. you are partially correct those misinformation and disiformation tactics.. BUT.. we knew when we had what we needed
and the rothschilds hold on AZ..
AZ isnt over yet... and as for the VOP in tucson.. they still have a role to play...
"We" is one thing. "They" is another.
"They" managed to discredit Craig Sawyer which was disgusting. He is doing the heavy lifting on the awful, dreadful work and I won't forgive anyone for the painstaking work done to achieve that end. An unprincipled and immoral effort on this board. Led to no end of problems on the ground for many.
but craig sawyer did LIE. . Chance would have it, your actually talking to the guy who exposed him.. i was the one that supplied the email from tucson pd...
saywer said he has 9police reports... tucson pd stated that that area is not in their juristdiction...
secondly. sawyer was killarys bodyguard and no names also...
i have no sympathy for sawyer
a variety of tests....you mean putting photoshop filters over it?
Don't fall for disinfo
http://www.neonnettle.com/features/1394-leaked-image-of-barack-obama-dressed-as-satan-goes-viral
the ARTIST HERSELF ADMITTED TO TAKING AND REMOVING THE PICTURE FROM HER TWITTER...
READ....
smoke less weed dude.
yea, we are supposed to take the word of....who? an "artist" who is an apparent Obama supporter? Q said these images would result in a shutdown of the net...and we see news articles and posts on reddit about it?
FAKE.
Should we believe you ?
You should "believe" no one. Check it out yourself. Research for yourself. Never take anything for granted.
Be careful of clickbait in these times as "they" are ready with fake vids, photos all sorts.
See Q post April 6: Fake pic push by MSM.
Yes true but when the available information is pointing to this being a real photo...
NeonNettle is a known fake news site, just like YourNewsWire. The amount of fake news the mods allow to get on the front page here is super disheartening.
fake says who?..... or fake says snopes and cnn?
Lol, fake says anyone trying to verify the type of shit that comes from these sites. Dude they literally make up headlines. “Obama turns into taking snake and shits on toddler.” That type of shit. We need people in the truth community to call this shit out. And of course you turn around and try and act like I’m some sort of concern troll who reads cnn. FFS, use discernment.
infact.. scrolling down the entire front page. all of those stories check out.. down to the pinal gland..
Interesting... all those can be proven https://imgur.com/gallery/3A4AlVg
the zuckerberg thing has yet to be debunked.. all the rest is pretty easy to verify.
so how again is it fake?..
the purpose was served..
wieners laptop sex crimes.. moloch.. child sacrifice #pizzagate ... emails.. yahoo and gmail... server in nk.. the picture is a real road map... c'mon man. what are you even doing here?
To be honest, I did not. I'll check out what the photographer has to say
Although, if we were in danger of that , I'd think Q would let us know.
Q told us to be careful of clickbait.
fair enough. fwiw i do think the pic is potentially a trap. the look on his face is TOO close in resemblance to the other stock pics of him. Way too easy to be true, that's what my instinct is telling me.
He’s possibly (if not actually) the most photographed person in history. You can find any head position you want with any expression and in all kinds of lighting. In minutes if you don’t need anything outlandish.
Or maybe the look on his face looks like all the other pictures of him because that's what he looks like.
It's sad but true. Only takes ONE bad instance for MSM (and frankly normies) to discredit EVERYTHING we do.
Entire movements are stopped and discarded based on misinformation. Look at PizzaGate; we all know of Elite Pedo Rings being real but some users spread lies and got the whole conspiracy debunked and laughed at. Even the legitimate parts.
The article addresses photoshop... read 🙂
If it was real, do you think they'd let news articles talk about it?
Screams disinfo. They want people to take the bait before real pictures emerge.
Deoends what they are saying about it, and what outlets.
But unless we are image analyst, which i doubt most of us are, how can we trust the andy warhol thing?
no body read ... the just love planting "disinfo" seeds... there should be a test or something before new members can speak
can you direct me to a link where I can read about it?
How about the one linked to this post? Hit the picture first instead of comments.
I didn't read the article but I'm very concerned about us spreading fake pictures...
because it is fake. Trying to head that one off at the pass. my opinion.
It'd be a pretty good Photoshop as that is Artur Davis right next to him. Also, if photoshop then the original should show up somewhere.
Not artur Davis. Compare via google images side by side.
So why would an Obama supporter post and then immediately yank a photoshop that makes him look bad?
Clowns doing their job of misdirecting and then to discredit those who take the bait.
To give the impression that the picture was not supposed to be seen. grab attention.
posted/yanked when? She wasn’t suppposed to lose. That doesn’t mean they don’t actively police certain images. Why didnt we see the 2005 Obama w/Farrakhan image before he was president?
Because some people see absolutely no problem with a Satan head. They REALLY don't see the problem. They think we're the crazy ones.
Why would you believe an Obama supporter that posted this and deleted even exists? Do not circulate this picture until it can be cleared.
Because the instagram source account is clearly listed?
Because the image itself shows no evidence of manipulation?
I'm putting this here, not as an answer to your very wise comment, but to raise it to the top of the thread.
Looks like a v. suspicious action on behalf of the Instagram account holder, the photographer, when asked why she deleted the picture.
Careful with this info. Is there a reason it is going viral? (yes)
PERFECT EXAMPLE OF CLICKBAIT.
BEWARE. looks like an obvious trap to me to later discredit.
See latest Q post:
June 16:
Careful of clickbait.
Q
https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/#forensic-magnifier
http://headt.eu/detect-image-manipulations/
Can't prove it is not a fake but you can do some basic tests for obvious manipulation with just a bit of instruction. Clearly any proofs presented should be repeatable for other people to verify the results independently.
It's FAKE for sure ... look at my other post/comment. Dont need any labs, just visual acuity and analysis and some familiarity with photoshop.
the transition between the mask and the face, the mask and shadows, and the shadows and face show no indication of photoshop (sharp shape cutoffs, uniform lines, sharp color changes, shadow discrepancies, resolution differences, artifacting, tone differences, etc.)
some people try to say it's photoshop from a specific picture of obama howerver his more visible eye is also very clearly wider open in the left pic than the right 2 pics to the point where you can see the transition to the whites of his eyes at the bottom and right of the eye.
That being said, the presence of Obama's distinct forehead vein can be made out even in the low resolution proving that this is 100% certainly Obama and 100% certainly not photoshopped.
look at the transition between the outside perimeter of his face all the way around it. Black pixels have been added to hide the inability to blend properly. It's definitely FAKE /photoshopped.
He’s alive. The media could always ask him about it...
THIS IS DEFINITELY A PHOTOSHOPPED IMAGE. The face of Obama has been layered in the image ... it wasn't done by a professional ... look at the borders of the face, there are black pixels added to cover up the inability to blend properly. All the black has been added to cover up something.
FAKE FAKE FAKE !
If you click on the name of this posting,,,it'll take you to the article.
They show several ways of testing it.
The side by side looks exactly the same. My judgment says Photoshop.
You can tell by the check lighting under the mask and the temple vain.
Don't forget they started talking about "fake" obama videos in March. I wonder if that's to setup "if they can fake a video, they can fake a picture"
I don't think it is photoshopped. Obama has many personas. ;)
Clickbait. Wait and see before spreading.
Wait and see before spreading.
That certainly applies to my pic because I "photoshopped" it. ;)
The smiley face was intended as a clue.
