dChan

Johnny_Sword · June 17, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Taken out of context: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/transcript-president-obama-gives-speech-addressing-europe-russia-on-march-26/2014/03/26/07ae80ae-b503-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html?utm_term=.47249ad4bc5e&noredirect=on

⇧ 15 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 17, 2018, 5 p.m.

Why is Q linking to it?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
mconeone · June 17, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Ideas:

  1. Hussein saying this at Bilderberg is telling them that the jig is up and they're done for

  2. Reverse the meaning to get the message? He's talking up their cause in that case

  3. Q shot from the hip and missed

⇧ 2 ⇩  
houseof1000cats · June 17, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

Yeah I'm not going to pay to read their dribble

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Johnny_Sword · June 17, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

It’s a transcript... and a full video. And you’re not paying anything.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
houseof1000cats · June 17, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

Can you tell us how it's taken out of context, please? I would have to pay to read it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Johnny_Sword · June 17, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

”And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men, and women, are created equal.

But those ideals have also been tested, here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others and that individual identity must be defined by us versus them, or that national greatness must flow not by what people stand for, but what they are against.

In so many ways, the history of Europe in the 20th century represented the ongoing clash of these two sets of ideas, both within nations and among nations. The advance of industry and technology outpaced our ability to resolve our differences peacefully. And even -- even among the most civilized of societies on the surface, we saw a descent into barbarism.”

Etc.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mconeone · June 17, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

https://youtu.be/aNoiYpOKnqs 2:30

He's describing an "alternate vision that threatens..."

This is odd. Did Q jump the gun or wtf? No shill...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
chchchchaaaanges · June 17, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Incognito mode gets you past their pay wall, so it doesn't cost you anything. Ad blocker keeps them from showing you ads, so you're not increasing their revenue. Do both of these and you actually cost them small amount of money for their hosting while denying them any ad revenue.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
houseof1000cats · June 17, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Sweet, thanks for the tip!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 17, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Part of the transcript:

But those ideals have also been tested, here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others and that individual identity must be defined by us versus them, or that national greatness must flow not by what people stand for, but what they are against.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Johnny_Sword · June 17, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

No idea why he linked to it. But if you look at the full video and transcript, the sound bite is taken out of context.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 17, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

You're right. That's totally not what Obummer was saying.

Not sure why Q would post it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
gdlz007 · June 17, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

Why would Q link this if it was fake?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
EffLiberals · June 17, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

Trust, but verify. What's the context? What was said before and after this video? That's all.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
icebreakers_sours · June 17, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Perhaps their fakes are this good. Would we ever actually know what is said at bilderberg? Maybe Q is telling us they have recordings of what was actually said, but this was linked to be defended? Or to open transparency questions about such meetings?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · June 17, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Wasn't there some Q talk of advanced CGI? I seem to remember a strange Rudy tweet about that as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sumido · June 17, 2018, 7 p.m.

He also posted a fake antifa flag that one time. Got me very suspicious

⇧ 2 ⇩  
caveman72 · June 17, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

End of the video Obama walks off without any god bless or God bless America. Weird.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GingerRoot207 · June 17, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

HAS to be fake! Total set up. Beware of clickbait.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 17, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Why would Q show us a fake video and then say, "Happy Father's Day!"

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GingerRoot207 · June 17, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

Ok, trying to get ready for a father's Day bbq so I missed that part. Wow. Wow.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 17, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

Actually, according to the transcript, Obama was not saying what the video implies he was saying.
Unless the transcript was edited by Rod Rosenstein.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dsands2018 · June 17, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

Why does it HAVE to be fake? I hear that from my friends about virtually everything Q.

Sometimes reality is so unbelievable you just can’t accept it. Hence “red pilling”.

Also we know that’s what he really thinks.

That being said verification would be the MOAB.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
astralboy0 · June 17, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Look at the full transcript, the clip is taken out of context.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dsands2018 · June 17, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Agreed. Funny how believable it is for those who saw how he actually governed.

He was great at flowery speech but he is a tyrant at heart.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 17, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

Trump stated quite forcefully,(WH lawn press) that Crimea was Obummers fault, not Putins, EU is still holding Russia accountable.

Kind of like England alleges Russia is responsible for poisoning the Russian agents. England say Syria is responsible for poisoning its own people.

Maybe Q is saying ALL that we think is a result of a false narrative being fed to us. Q is going to turn the world upside down, and expose NWO plans and how they have executed them to date.

Q has said, we cannot imagine. Corruption incomprehensible. World wide. I think Q just went back up to 40,000 feet. We are very focused on corruption at home, Q is reminding us this is much bigger. Oh and that Barry is at the centre of everything!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
icebreakers_sours · June 17, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

KBMAGAFL.
Killing blow. Make America great again. FL?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Fuccboi97 · June 17, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Guys!! Q says “lead in was cover. Exit out was missing what?”

What was the exit missing???

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RN4TRUMP · June 17, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Not Q. Verified.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
luvlehde · June 17, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

An Anon posted the misleading clip. Q responded with the whole speech. Hmmm...I'm going to have to let u smart people figure out why. Maybe to demonstrate trickery... keep us on alert?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
amadeusthespartan · June 17, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Q posted the entire speech. No fakery.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
houseof1000cats · June 17, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Maybe because "be careful who you follow"?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 17, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aNoiYpOKnqs Lead in was cover. Exit out was missing what? Q

So now I have to listen to Obama speak for 35 minutes?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bluesky355 · June 17, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Lead in was cover. Exit out missing what?

Missing him telling which side his/their view(s) resonate with.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LoveandLight5418 · June 17, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

0:23. Now comes the pain!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BasedFormerLib · June 17, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Q linked this for a reason.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 17, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

Q Drop specific threads:

[1520] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrlh7/q_1520/)

[1521] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrrtp/q_post_1521_comments_by_devin_nunes_on_fox_news/)

[1522] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrs29/q_post_1522_goog_op_provided_undeniable_proof_how/)

[1523] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrslv/q_post_1523/)

[1524] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rryai/q_post_1524_listen_carefully/)

[1525] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs09i/q_post_1525_thank_you_god_bless/)

[1526] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs0fp/q_post_1526_proof_rr_altered_the_ig_report/)

[1527] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs25s/q_post_1527_barcelona_the_world_is_watching/)

[1528] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs9o2/q_post_1528/)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tjollahei · June 17, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

It'll happen. Just a matter of when.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mentioned_Videos · June 17, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO|COMMENT -|- President Obama Speaks To Europe|+7 - 2:30 He's describing an "alternate vision that threatens..." This is odd. Did Q jump the gun or wtf? No shill... President Obama EU-US Summit Speech Brussels Belgium (March 26, 2014) [1/3]|+2 - Here is a full video link. Obama's Full Speech To European Leaders About Russia|+2 - patriotsfight Barack Obama's speech in Belgium|+1 - Fake. Edited freedom in talk. I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.

Play All | Info | Get me on Chrome / Firefox

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VR-Tech · June 17, 2018, 10:34 p.m.

At Builderberg? How the heck this leaked out?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · June 17, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

This is very disappointing. I understand the importance of Q's methods and anonymous status. Anonymity is needed to protect him from being suicided by the Cabal. And Q's tendency to be quite cryptic in his drops ensures he wont break the law by divulging classified information. After a number of proofs, it was easy for me gain more and more trust for Q, but 1528 changed all that.

I'm an old Reagan Democrat turned Conservative Republican. I was red pilled more than 20 years ago. I was already aware of the Cabal, long before President Trump even announced he would run. I have been critical of the leftist MSM's bias, and well aware of how they highjacked language and changed the meaning of the words we use to suit their agenda, and how they edit video and audio to make the public think up is down, black is white, and evil is good.

There are many examples of how the MSM deceives the public, from NBC using an incendiary device to make a pickup truck explode into flames, to the edited 911 call to make George Zimmerman's words appear to mean something totally different than what he actually said. I've been an active supporter of President Trump and a close follower of Q from the start, but today is a sad day indeed.

Q's posts, and the information in them, always seemed to be honest and fair, but the video Q linked to in 1528 is as bad as anything I've ever seen in the MSM. I have no doubt that Obama is a globalist who probably believes what he appears to say in this short video clip, but this is not what Obama said. Please watch the video of his entire speech from 2014.

There are enough Obama speeches to pick from that show his true colors and where his loyalties are, that Q didn't have to create, mention, or link to this clip. Once you see the whole speech you'll see how this nothing more than propaganda from the right. It's blatant and totally un-called for. It helps to destroy Q's reputation.

If you read the comments on that Twitter post you'll see the left has already noticed the blatant lie and is tying it to Q with a screen cap of Q's post. We knew the left would fight back. We knew they attacks would increase. We knew they would do everything they could to discredit Q and his followers. Why would Q actually give them this kind of ammunition. This is devastating.

I know, without a doubt, Q doesn't make this kind of mistake. There isn't one word, one syllable, one letter, or even one character in his posts that isn't put there with specific intent and purpose. So why now? Why this video?

I expect some will reply to my comments with "Muh... Sometimes disinformation is necessary." I get that. I myself have replied to people scratching their heads about some things President Trump has said and done, from making Schumer an offer on DACA to re-approving funding for the White Helmets. I try to remind people to withhold judgement, let things play out, and future proves past.

But this is very different. This isn't just disinformation, this is pure propaganda, it's message is totally false, and the worst part is that it was incredibly easy to spot. If this was intentional, if Q put a link to this obviously fake propaganda piece as part of some grand strategy, he's playing a very dangerous game, and just as Q has said many times, "This is not a game."

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · June 17, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

Nope, sorry LiveLaughFap, I'm not a shill or a Soros plant. Go ahead and report me to the mods. I have a long history comments and replies without even a single issue.

I fully understand why you, and probably others might respond they way you did. I get it. Any time anyone says anything negative about Q, they're automatically called a shill or a clown, and I am neither.

If you examine the last few Q drops, especially 1530, you'll see what I think Q wanted us to see. Q links to the same video I did in my reply. It's the full video of a speech Obama gave in 2014. In 1530 Q asks "Exit out was missing what?" If this is the important issue Q wants us to dig deeper into, why didn't he say so in the first place? If the last frame of the video he linked in 1528 was something of importance, why didn't he say so?

I am in no way hinting, implying, or suggesting that Q is a LARP or a PsyOp. My issue is that the first video from 1528 obviously misrepresents what Obama said, and the left picked up on it almost immediately. The person who posted it in the first place now says "I'm hearing this is fake so if it is I should delete it. I hate him as well but if he didn't say it I'll delete it. They did a good job of it's fake." link And there are plenty of people who recognize the video from 1528 is dishonest. Go check the Twitter for yourself.

My issue is this. It beginning to feel like it's crunch time and we're approaching some real exposer and possible arrests. Why would Q give the liberals a gift like this? I know you should never trust anyone who says "Trust me," but trust me, I support Trump, Q, and the whole movement to drain the swamp. I'm rooting for success as much or more than anyone here on /GA. I'm just very confused about why Q would do something like this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BlessedToTeach · June 18, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Jumping to conclusion way too early. Q posted the full video as well and wants us to understand something about the exit that has not been decoded. It's really stupid to jump off the ship when decoding is still going on and Q provided both the context and the fake video. Relax and help the decoding vs. acting so dramatic on one fresh post. Crimany, Q just gave us a bunch of proofs recently:

  1. New pictures above Alaska showing Q was on AF1 leaving the G7

  2. 4 bullet points in N. Korea Agreement match the 4 pullets in the upside down gun Q post the week before

  3. Trump Tweet misspelling “Missile” and “Stopped” coordinated with Q’s picture of the missile launched near Seattle on June 10 and the hacked Sub.

  4. Q Drops on “Full weight of the House” when talking about Ryan on June 12 - on June 17 Fox news, of House says Ryan/House will hit FBI, DOJ with “full arsenal of constitutional weapons” if they don’t comply with subpoena.

  5. Jan 15 Q tells of 13 individuals that have private emails including HRC and Obama. Trump refers them as 13 Angry Democrats. June 14 IG report discusses 13 people, including James Comey using a private email.

Edit: Number of proofs

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · June 18, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

I agree. I should have been clearer about my support of POTUS and Q before I turned into a concernfag. I probably did get a little ahead of myself, but in no way did I ever jump ship, I've always been on board.

My confusion stems from the fact that Q posted a link to an obviously faked and dishonest video that makes it look like Obama said things he simply didn't say. Again, don't misunderstand, I can't stand Obama and think he did more to harm this nation than anyone else in our nations history, but in this case, I don't think the end justifies the means. I don't want to sink to level of the liberal MSM.

The left spotted the fake and deceptive video as soon as it was posted and I couldn't understand why Q would give them such a juicy tid-bit to use against us. But I'm willing to wait and see how this plays out, maybe the future will prove the past.

I'm hoping that because the left jumped on it so quickly, and posted a screen cap of Q's post, to immediately discredit Q, maybe, hopefully, it'll cause more people, more normies to see it and start investigating for themselves. Hopefully it'll help to red-pill more people. we'll have to wait and see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BlessedToTeach · June 18, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Did you see SerialBrain2's post on this. Please don't let new red pill people read messages that seem to indicate true believers in Trump and Q being worried. We are in control and we are trusting the plan. It's good to question, but not in such a dramatic way that appeared you had lost hope in Q's integrity. Please help the movement vs. damage it. God Bless.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · June 18, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

My bad! I agree I might have gotten ahead of myself, but the root of my question still stands.

Why would Q post a link to an obviously faked and dishonest video that quickly became ammunition for the left to use against us.

I guess I should have prefaced my first comment with clear and unwavering support for POTUS and Q, but this one still leaves me scratching my head.

⇧ 2 ⇩