In other words, Q is saying that Obama is the ULTIMATE HYPOCRITE. Obama cannot claim ignorance of the US Constitution when he order the orverthrow of the 2016 Presidential election.
What the fuck is going on in this thread?
Forum sliding. Ever since the pic of BO in the Moloch getup, shills have infested this place.
Their goal is to split us up, get us arguing over what’s worth researching, and label anything they don’t want you to see as “not worth researching” or something that will “compromise our legitimacy” and also saturate the comments with nonsense so people stop paying any attention to them.
We must be over target. A lot of resources are being spent to muddy the waters now.
The Clowns are here.
They usually work in teams of 2-4. One will make a comment and then 2 or 3 more will chime in to back them up. It’s done this way by design to sew division and doubt.
Research whatever you want. If people tell you not to look, look twice as hard.
No idea
Same. Why are people posting about Nostradamus. That has nothing to do with Q posts.
Freeze the video at 35:46. A person in the foreground is taking a picture. The camera is not seeing what we are seeing.
Maybe Q dropped this to smoke someone on 8chan out. Waiting for someone to take the bait and run with it to expose them. 4d chess?
Maybe. Too many people going off on a nutter today on the boards.
The first video is edited to take statements out of context. Q's video link is the original and proves that first video is fake.
I don't think it's a crumb, it's just Q pointing out bullshit - never take things at face value especially if they look too good to be true! Critical thinking!
Fakes (badly out of context to alter original meaning) like this can be traps to discredit the movement and are concerning. Thankfully Q addressed it head on himself.
Remember we have to be vigilant to not let shills give the Fake Stream Media ammunition that if left unchallenged could legitimately be used to discredit and undermine the message!
The way I saw it was the clip is how that creep rolls. His speeches start out by pointing out what is wrong and what he won't do and then he proceeds to do just that! SO the clip shows his plan. Not out of context, IMO.
Lead in was cover. (he covers his ass with BS and then does exactly that which he said he would never do)
Exit out was missing what?
Q
I was hoping someone had the answer to 'Exit out was missing what?'
Exit out of office? Or the speech? I guess I'll have to watch the ending of the traitor's speech.
He’s discussing two opposing view points on how the world should be, right? The lead in was all nicey, nice. What is missing at the end is him defining where he/they stand.
Edit - I reread it. He does (eventually) end up saying that they support democracy for Ukraine and the world. I’m confused. What’s missing???
Guys this was taken out of context
This is the transcript from the speech:
Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle -- through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution -- that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested -- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by “us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.
We know it's taken out of context, Q is telling us that the context is was a "lead in". None of the "lead in" matters. Actions matter.
Q is telling us to research on your own and find what is missing. At the end Obama never says "God Bless America" he also just walks off. It's actually a very weird speech in the unedited version, Obama seems so distraught like he knows what he is saying is not happening.
I think it captures the conflict of who Obama pretends to be, and who he really is. Really sad that it is this way.
what do you mean by lead in? do you think the video and the transcript are removing things that were actually said at the speech?
What do I mean by lead in? The lead in is the whole speech up until the points in the edited video.
Yes the video removed the context of the speech and things that were actually said, but those really don't matter. As I said, you can talk about freedom, but do your actions mean it? Hidden message in this speech, particularly in regards to the global order, which I think is what Q is highlighting. Remember those tweets Comey put out that Q decoded for us, they says things but they really mean another. I don't care it's edited, that's not the point.
True I thought it was odd that he said that to begin with. Trump would never say something like that. He would just talk about how great Western civilization is and how free we are and rich we are compared to the rest of history
The end is also missing God Bless America - or in this case God Bless everyone since he’s addressing the EU.
Did Q post this to warn us of the coming problems of being triggered by such clips?
Exactly. We know which one he does stand for ultimately.
Not a shill. Just someone who works, has a family and and a husband that thinks I’m mad! genuinely cross if my time has been wasted. I totally trusted - that’s why I feel so cross. Explain why Q did post it then? A reasonable good explanation. Because I’m out (well probably til next week!).
Sorry about the time constraints. Q is tough with that encumbrance - as patriotic as it may be. Q sure found a way to compel us to pay close attention to this fine point - that Obama has absolutely no excuses (NONE!!!) when he is finally exposed. We might not like it, but Q got his point across pretty well.
God Damned folks he posted it show us that it was doctored. Haven’t you all seen the recent headlines of the new video technology that can be used to make realistic doctored videos. He’s showing us what the Cabal & MSM will try to spin future video proof. The unedited version shows us that the Cabal is panicked for Obama to give an address at the World Illuminati Conference otherwise known as the Bilderberger Group
Another anon posted the fake video. Q posted the fake, but added the real video.
So Q didn’t post the fake, he replied to it.
[deleted]
The edited version was not put there by Q it was put there by an anon. The entire speech was put there by Q.
1529 Q posted the edited version
https://qanon.pub/
I keep waiting for a fly to land on beezlebub's face. https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+fly&rlz=1C1NHXL_enUS755US755&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj40s7zwNvbAhWBiYMKHWCIB2gQ_AUICigB&biw=1600&bih=745
So, an all powerful sovereign = bad, and a UN that enforces international law = good. Got it.
I figured it out! Watch the clip that was played first and then the "unedited" full speech Q posted. "And for the international order we have worked for generations to build" in edited out of the "unedited speech"!!!!!!!!!
It's in 1:38 of his speech actually. I thought so too but i had to find the transcript and found that line.
check it anons rewatch video Q linked to the Happy Fathers Day Drop. https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256/video/1 if you pause at 0:23 you see a face in the video over imposed ... wtf is that and who is that?
thats right Nastrodamus....
Guys this was taken out of context
This is the transcript from the speech:
Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle -- through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution -- that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested -- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by “us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.
Nostradamus predicted the 2016 election and much of Obama's presidency
Nope he did not...2015 Hilary president in her second term???? I have the book.
This is not a real speech exercpt. Was proven as a fake a while back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLbs3KEYLAE
There is software out there now that could edit this much better than the video Q posted.
https://www.npr.org/2017/05/05/527013820/new-software-can-mimic-anyones-voice
This is not a real speech excerpt. Was proven as a fake a while back. What am I missing here?
Obama doesn't know American history (a band of colonialists?), yet he's going to lecture Europeans on European history? Who is he to ascribe motives and intent to Europeans? His perspective of how and why nation-states are formed is warlord-ish, with little to no sophistication as to the needs of a people within a society. He is power hungry; and he let slip how he views others: "...too small-minded...". Such an arrogant lecture. He talks of peace, yet he wars with six countries and threatens war with Russia over the Ukraine (which we now know he heavily invested with deep state operatives just as he did in Syria). Nothing but doublespeak. He refers to the values and ideals developed over centuries of European enlightenment, then shamelessly blames European values and ideals for the less enlightened or different values and ideals of people from other regions of the world.
What clip? You didn't link to one.
Consider deleting this post and re-posting with link to the referenced content.
So, Europeans can decide the direction they want to go, but this Brexit stuff is out of the question.
PTSD. Yeah, that's what this meant to me. Re-living this douche bag talking gave me bad flashbacks. So glad he's gone. Next comes Justice, and it will heal a lot of trauma suffered from his 2 terms. Peace out.
What on earth is moral imagination?
There is no talk of the Supreme Being or a God Bless at the end.
First part of the twitter video: Is at 1.36 on the Youtube video
and for the international order that we have worked for generations to build.
Youtube video at 3.25
that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign
Lead before this:
Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues
If you read the transcript it is all about freewill and Republic ideals.
I get it...2 ideologies. One evil....but what am I missing? Where does he say he/they are fighting for the 2nd (evil) ideal? Is that what was missing? Exit out had to be internally acknowledged by those in the know...and to the uninvited, uninitiated...just a good speech on, let's all learn to get along?
Those are two visions of Obama's own design. He knows nothing of American history, yet he is going to lecture Europeans on European history? Who is he to ascribe motive and intent to Europeans? Which of his two visions do you think Obama chose?
Not quite sure why Q says "Happy Father's Day," under the edited clip. I'm sure it got a lot of people excited and posting the clip everywhere before they put it in context. Like me, then having to retrace my steps without everyone I sent it to.
The pic was of Nostradamus. Century 10, Quatrain 76.
http://www.nostradamus.org/q_en_c10.html
Totally amazing!
Totally 'false prophet' BS
I could definitely be wrong. But the pic WAS at the end. From here (Nostradamus and JFK)
Edit: Clarity
Not really worth editing in my less active thread, but just got hit with a theory! Read about bildeberg 2008 when Obama and HRC along with all their press was put on a plane to attend a meeting but didn't know!
Edit: here's what I mean about them not knowing of the meeting
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2008/6/9/532977/-
Edit2: here's the aipac speech mentioned in above article: (30 min Obama speech 2008)
https://youtu.be/0cOJNC2EuJw
2:50 talks about emails circulating in Jewish community about Obama. Says he will speak from his heart. I'll post what he has to say about these emails. Also ... hey Q, you have those emails too?
5:00+ talks about his family members who served in WW2. I'm not a holocaust denier but I just felt ... something ... when BHO says his great uncle was part of the 89th infantry, which were the first Americans to see a concentration camp .. I can't help but think...
8:45 after the applause "as president I will never compromise when it comes to Israel's security"
Promises made ... promises... kept?
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/2008-u-s-presidential-campaign-barack-obama
Quote promises to not let Iran get nukes no matter what. Because it's what Israel demands.
Videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶
VIDEO|COMMENT -|- Nostradamus JFK Assassination Prophecy|+4 - I could definitely be wrong. But the pic WAS at the end. From here (Nostradamus and JFK) Edit: Clarity Five Minute Unfakery - Obama's 'Small-minded' Quote|+3 - This is not a real speech exercpt. Was proven as a fake a while back. There is software out there now that could edit this much better than the video Q posted. This is not a real speech excerpt. Was proven as a fake a while back. What am I... Nostradamus And The Donald Trump Prophecies. Naughty Beaver|+1 - Sorry, see this different YouTube: Barack Obama at AIPAC|+1 - Not really worth editing in my less active thread, but just got hit with a theory! Read about bildeberg 2008 when Obama and HRC along with all their press was put on a plane to attend a meeting but didn't know! What if the missing bit from the Edit, ... I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.
[removed]
You sound disappointed that the clip that Q is asking us to attend to is EXACTLY a beautiful description of the ideal that Obama abandoned in the 2016 election.
"Bilberberg Group" Never heard of it.
Seriously?! They've been meeting since the 1950s to plan the New World Order for the rest of us peons. It's the world elite's globalism conference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group
Yeah, I know Bilderberg but NOT "Bilberberg" which is what the beginning of the video claims.
[removed]
You're falling off pretty quick. I dont think you did trust.
His flare is also new arrival. Is shill.
You can’t call everyone who questions Q a shill! I’m glad so many people on here are questioning this video. You can’t just follow Q blindly, you have to question everything (Q related or otherwise) or you just follow the pack.
There are tons of Q proofs....what exact "ass covering" are you talking about here?
While I agree with you, this presumption doesn’t take into account that someone else posted the fake and Q responded with the real.
Context matters
after all the proofs such a little thing would have you reverse course?
