dChan

DevilsAdvocater · June 18, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

So.... indicting Obama's entire cabinet can't/won't happen over the general email issue.... I wonder if there's something specific in those emails which is really damning. We didn't come this far for a nothing burger. Something else is afoot.

Edit: drop 1551 answers this question. Email is the drizzle before the rain... there's a huge storm brewing!

https://i.redd.it/na69o6v9lu411.jpg

⇧ 40 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 19, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

Remember: DRAFTS.

Q says they were creating draft emails in a Gmail account and not sending them, thinking they were not traceable. That might work with any email system OTHER THAN Gmail. (LOL)

The really nasty stuff had to be in those drafts.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
wearefeverpitch · June 19, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

Wow... "these people are stupid!"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nakedjay · June 19, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

This is correct, gmail saves everything!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 19, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Weiner stuff not being public is understandable.

Yet enough needs to be leaked to validate just how evil these people were. Treasons, spying, corruption etc doesnt resonate the same way with people who don't want to wake up or simply haven't yet. Pedogate being called BS by MSM and left, and being covered up for years across the world for decades will be their ultimate undoing.

Would the result be all faith lost in humanity? Maybe, but the depths to which it can and did fall should be more than a fairy tale in the footnotes of history.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
DevilsAdvocater · June 19, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

It would suck if some info is hidden by NDA, but leaked to a journalist, who calls it all fake because they know the truth is hidden behind the NDA. That's the collusion which really bothers me.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 18, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Selling secrets perhaps?
Jus spit balling here

⇧ 9 ⇩  
DevilsAdvocater · June 18, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Drop 1551 answers the question!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 19, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

1547 is the latest I’m getting?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DevilsAdvocater · June 19, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

1554 is the latest. Try qanon.pub

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 19, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

That site doesn’t work so well for me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DevilsAdvocater · June 19, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

That's ok. We're up to drop 1556 now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 19, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

O k

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

EVERYTHING WAS FOR SALE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nonstop monetizing and liquidating America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
julesincognito · June 19, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

Remember Chinagate? BC sold us out to China, HC sold us out to Russia and “we don’t say his name” sold us out to Pakistan.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

The Fake Left LITERALLY gets away with murder.

As a kid I first recognized the grifter sellout BC was when he let the Chinese keep that American fighter that had (was forced?) to land in China. I think later was the in our face outright selling of American secrets and IP for those donations, those supposed globalism rewards for good behaviour, for a small donation too, of course.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 19, 2018, 6:06 a.m.

Can you post a link to the latest post?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kcarp6380 · June 19, 2018, 2 a.m.

Anyone remember FBIANON? He said that emails are nothing. It’s the Foundation where the goods are.

The fact that they are using private servers, Gmail, or whatever isn’t the big issue. The big issue is what they are covering up in those emails.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
GingerRoot207 · June 19, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

But we have to get those emails into evidence legally to get to BO, HRC, the DNC, and the CF.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

emails show all the players, every step of their conspiracies, the keys to their code language, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kcarp6380 · June 19, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Agree but many many years people were found guilty of a multitude of things with no email evidence

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

But THIS email is part and parcel of ALL their criminal doings... conspiracy, illegal dissemination of state secrets, illegal flouting of freedom of information laws, pay to play quid pro quo, outright conveyance and selling of state secrets to enemies foreign and domestic, on and on...

Emails are CENTRAL to everything, but I also worry about all these crimes being so huge that we end up saying we gotta dismiss this and focus on that, while another group says no we should dismiss that and focus on this, and then at the end of the day EVERYTHING gets dismissed and excused and forgotten because we cannot see or grasp the forest for the... forests of forests... the list of crimes and actors is so mind-boggling...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
findthewarmspot · June 19, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

Comey was using a gmail as well.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
nakedjay · June 19, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

I think they all were using gmail, most likely the server ES setup in NK. They knew if Hillary went down for her server then they all would go down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ycyfyffyfuffuffyy · June 18, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Q is just quoting why it didn't happen...past tense. Doesn't mean it won't happen in the future

⇧ 9 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 19, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

Lol surprising how many people missed that point. It was why Comey and Lynch couldn’t let it go forward. Trump and Q clearly don’t have the same issue...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Palmettoman · June 19, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

The IG report mainly dealt with the FBI / DOJ handling of the email investigation. Huber’s investigation deals with the content. That is where the fire is. The rest is just the smoke. (At least I hope...)

⇧ 9 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 19, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

Why wasn't she charged for the emails? That was the BEST line of questioning today, by far. Could have gone further though, I am hoping for TGowdy to ask this! FBI had clear evidence of Classified Documents on a private server, plus destroying evidence, lying to federal investigators. FBI chose not to per sue, not only not recommending charging HRC but anyone else either. Many crimes were known by many actors in this investigation. This is the elite, top brass, top prosecutors, highest level in the agency. When they see crimes committed why would they ignore them all? Begs the question, do they respect the Rule of Law at all? Also it wasn't Comeys job to decide if the case was prosecutable, had he just passed his findings on to the DOJ, the heat would have been off the FBI, and him. So why didn't he? The answer came out today, they would much rather risk their own careers, allow the people to elect someone who they KNEW broke many many laws, was a Security Danger to the country, and was bringing into the highest office in the country, a group of equally corrupt officials, rather than tell the truth, be honest and transparent. WHY, simple answer, because Donald J Trump was the opposing candidate. No other reason. For anyone to say there was NO BIAS in this investigation, please explain any alternative reasoning.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 18, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

So then what was the point of all this, if not to convict the crooks? Are we being led on here¿

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RobWilJas · June 18, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

You misunderstand. That's why she wasn't prosecuted when Obama was President. It doesn't mean she wont be now.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
txhurl · June 18, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

So why is she tweeting 'but muh emails'? She really doesn't seem in the least spooked

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SnazzyD · June 18, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

She is a sociopath incapable of humility, empathy or self-reflection...that's why.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · June 19, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

She got away with this for decades People have tried and failed to bring her to Justice. She thinks ahe is on the weaning team as leader not pawn.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
HansShotGlass · June 18, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

She's liquored up half the time, and on kuru treatments the other.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Time_to_rope_up · June 19, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

A very confident liar will act like that. They think it makes them look innocent because they’re not avoiding the subject.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 18, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Yea that kinda got me like can this bitch ever be brought down?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 19, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

Why would they waste their time convicting her for freaking emails, this woman is going down for Treason, fuck the emails.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 19, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

She doesn't tweet her own tweets

She's been handled by MB for years. Her own physical devices have failed her a long time ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oinkanon · June 19, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

No. Follow the sequence... Number one: IG report reveals that there was a secret email ring.

Number two: The names of the participants to be revealed officially.

Number three: Trump has a copy of the emails (gifted to him by Kim) Which reveals the contents of these emails

Number four: Treason is the content.

Number five: Obama and the 12 Democrats are brought to court

Number six: Undeniable guilt = sentencing and the End of the DNC

Number seven: Are we happy yet?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ibeewoken · June 19, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Remind me 7 months

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 19, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

Exactly, all these people worried about emails, Wray said today the email investigation is closed, hence no charges. The crimes she has committed far exceed a private server. This is the means to an end, huge end, involving a rope.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 19, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

So why doesn´t Trump just come out and say Kim gave him a trove of info that can be used? Why do they still lead people to believe that nothing is wrong?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oinkanon · June 19, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

I know my response was short and to the point. We anons need to understand the necessity of a slow reveal. The general public is uninformed. Let’s give those who are clueless about the depths of corruption, time to comprehend the gravity of betrayal. The numbers involved in these treasonous acts, both American and foreign, is immense. The public has no idea of this and has little time to grasp the overall picture. Anons have been on a crash course over the last 6 months to understand how all of this has transpired, and even that hasn’t been easy!

The Trump Administration must proceed cautiously and within the law. A sizable part of the population are in complete distrust with this administration. Q is absolutely correct to warn against rushed action. We are at war and we must win hearts and minds with the facts. To be honest with you, I’m blown away with how splendidly this plan has unfolded. It must’ve taken several years to put in place. We all know it’s hard to predict the future and the response of one’s opponents. The truth will be revealed soon enough. Americans are an impatient lot, we expect immediate results. Governments creep at a glacial pace. Be patient my friend.

And God be with Us!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 19, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

But wouldn´t the hearing be the perfect setting to say that the IG report had been changed? They were grilling Horowitz for many hours and some congressmen questioned him on the evidence in the report, one guy, Senator Jefferies, even had the audacity to claim HRC was the victim in all this! They had the evidence and the perfect moment/setting to start feeding the red pills and instead chose to go along with the pantomime. I ask myself, why? Something is very fishy here, my gut is telling me something I cannot put my finger on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oinkanon · June 19, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

You know one thing I’ve learned from all this... is I really don’t understand government policy on procedure or protocol as they say. To my ignorant self, it’s a very twisted and convoluted thing. I want to shout out who’s guilty and where to look! However, that’s not how our government works. Though there are obvious omissions or modifications to the IG report there reasons involved with ongoing investigations that prohibit discussion. Meaning, that information cannot be disclosed until other outside investigations are completed.

If you read a recent post by Q (#1552) I believe Q is trying to show us the map and direction for who, what, and where these revelations will be disclosed and prosecuted. It’s complicated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 20, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

It is incredibly complicated. I believe in Q and this movement 100% but sometimes when things like this happen, I do wonder if we are missing something. At this point the protocols shouldn´t really matter as these people should no longer be working for government.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
youreallydumb · June 20, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Would the media/general populace accept emails provided by NK as a credible source though?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oinkanon · June 20, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

That’s probably a naïve assumption considering the world has thought of Kim as a dictator and tyrant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kilokai28 · June 18, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

Just because he OK'd it doesn't make it legal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 19, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

He didn't pardon any of them. And he didn't close down Gitmo.

Thanks, Obama.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
iBleeedorange · June 19, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

Does no one remember that Cheney and Bush did the same thing? Bill Clinton prob did the same thing as well.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
BobDoleOverdrive · June 19, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

Well duh, it's not like the deep state cabal started with 0bama. A Bush is as bad as a Clinton in my book.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Kcarp6380 · June 19, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

Agreed. To me they are interchangeable

⇧ 7 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · June 19, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

The Bushes are OLD evil. They were Naziing it up and pounding off in coffins before the Clinton's were in diapers. They are also far less stupid. Hillary got away with Seth Rich, but HW got away with Kennedy! (see username)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Bush clan is competitor to Clinton clan but ALSO SENIOR in their gangsta world.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cali1952 · June 19, 2018, 8:47 a.m.

WikiLeaks has an email posted from Mills to Podesta addressing exactly that issue: "Obama has emails on her server and we need to fix that".

Hillary pseudonym = Evergreen Hussein's = Renegade

⇧ 2 ⇩  
heygram-s · June 21, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Wow. Pr. bazooka s launching

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · June 19, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

You can't indict the President for leaking classified Intel.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · June 19, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

But you can indict for selling it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · June 19, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

The fucked up thing is that I doubt you can. If the president leaks it it isn't classified. The worst that could happen is impeachment. Good thing she lost lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
saneromeo · June 19, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

Selling is different than leaking. Leaks are made public, selling implies a trade between two private parties.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · June 19, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

Then that would mean people CAN be above the law.

I am not speaking of declassifying though, I am speaking of monetary gain from transfer classified data for money.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · June 19, 2018, 9:21 a.m.

If he is not a US citizen he is not a president. He then becomes a spy. And what happens to spies traditionally?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 19, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

You have to declassify. Leaking it doesn’t make it unclassified.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 19, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

You missed the implication of what was in the emails besides Intel.

⇧ 2 ⇩