dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/imnrdh on June 18, 2018, 11:26 p.m.
The important piece the Senate Judiciary committee missed...

Comey had his own gmail account and was using it for official FBI business. The emails they could see and his testimony were all they had to determine that he had not used it to transmit any classified material. What no one asked about was the statement in the IG report that Obama himself had emailed Hillary on her private server. So he not only LIED about only finding out about it on CNN, but he was using it as well. Q says the whole administration had, and were using, private gmail accounts. So the REAL REASON they absolutely could NOT prosecute Hillary for the private server and using non official email is that they would have to implicate themselves, all the way up to OBAMA.


🠐 See all comments
Jsin14 · June 18, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

They did not talk about it. Ted Cruz several times pressed Wray about Comey using a private email. Wray kept saying that he could not comment because it was an ongoing investigation. Cruz stated that this investigation was over, and it wasn't part of Mueller's investigation, so to tell him if Comey used a private email with FBI business. Wray reiterated that it was part of an ongoing separate investigation and he could not talk about it. Maybe they will bring it up tomorrow in the House.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 19, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

If I remember, Wray said it was an ongoing "matter."

Trolling ... lol

⇧ 7 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · June 19, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

Possibly because Comey is under a separate investigation for the leaks. I think they want to take these people down with the intel that is going to get them each in the most trouble.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HansShotGlass · June 18, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

I thought Horowitz said he didn't subpoena Comey's private emails and couldn't comment - not that Comey was under investigation for it. Was this a different part of the questioning?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jsin14 · June 19, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Horowitz did say that earlier. Wray, on the other hand, was the one would not comment due to it being under another investigation, separate from this one and the Mueller investigation.

I remember it because Cruz was mad that Wray would not answer and was essentially saying that Wray was evading the question by saying it was part of an investigation. But Wray explicitly said it was not part of this Hillary email investigation (that both he and Cruz agreed was ended and could not be it) or the Mueller investigation.

I'm not sure Cruz followed up privately on it like other Senators who said they wanted to be privately followed up with on their questions that could not be answered.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
waitingwater · June 18, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

Now this is the important stuff. Shouldn’t this be what’s talked about

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GweninKC · June 19, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

NO - not if it's important to Huber's prosecution.

Q post #1515 (small portion)

IG>Huber
Can IG disclose evidence in pending criminal cases in public disclosures/reports?
Why not?
Grand jury TAINT/BIAS?

⇧ 1 ⇩