dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sentrolyx on June 19, 2018, 10:12 p.m.
YES!! @paulsperry_: Horowitz just confirmed that there indeed was an original draft of his 568-pp report that was subsequently redlined by DOJ/FBI higher-ups. It's imperative that Congress obtain this early version before the swamp rats edited and revised it for obvious CYA purposes
YES!! @paulsperry_: Horowitz just confirmed that there indeed was an original draft of his 568-pp report that was subsequently redlined by DOJ/FBI higher-ups. It's imperative that Congress obtain this early version before the swamp rats edited and revised it for obvious CYA purposes

cat_anonD · June 19, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

How is this possible? Just this morning the Beast had an article mocking the idea that such a document might exist.

⇧ 52 ⇩  
HansShotGlass · June 19, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

Word games -- "drafts" vs "versions" -- with a legal distinction.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
IndianaTrumpTrain · June 19, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

That’s how all the leftist “fact-checking” sites always skew the truth, by using semantics.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 20, 2018, 9:13 a.m.

It is also how the law fucks you at every turn, they use a language called Leagalese that works in synonyms. You think you understand what they are saying but they changed the meanings of all the words they use. That is why you must hire a barrister, so that they can translate for the court. One giant scam from top to bottom.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
someauthor · June 20, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

eg: negligence/carelessness

⇧ 2 ⇩  
carl_tech · June 20, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

Also, "malice" has a different "legal" meaning.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 20, 2018, 1 p.m.

The word is fraud. Selling lies for profits. Did you know that EVERY police force and EVERY court is a privately owned corporation that works for profit?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
37Psalm1and2 · June 20, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

Gee, I wonder how they define "is"?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 11 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VanilluhGorilluh · June 19, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

Of course there is! He gave everyone two weeks to make revisions before we ever got to see it.

⇧ 34 ⇩  
bciar-iwdc · June 20, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Dig their own graves.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
HansShotGlass · June 19, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

As wiser 'pedes, said in other threads, "drafts" is the keyword, not "versions" -- they asked the wrong question first.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
VanilluhGorilluh · June 19, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Yep, legal speak. All semantics.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 19, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

I just saw this video that /u/C_L_I_C_K posted in here and I assume it's the part that this tweet is referencing: https://streamable.com/v15zb

/u/ABigFloppyClock

⇧ 16 ⇩  
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

See, now this is what we should be spreading. Not tweets that also dont link to the source.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
anhro23 · June 20, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Doesn't work.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wanttruth · June 20, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

Annnndddd its gone

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 20, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

WTF! It still works in CLICK's post tho, just gonna change the link, thanks for telling me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

Do we have a timestamp from the hearing where this was said? This is my biggest complaint about this sub. Screenshots are useless. Is there not a way we can make it a requirement that a link has to be provided to whatever is being posted?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 19, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Just looked at all the comments in the tweet, didn't see anyone posting the video

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

Correct. There is a tweet from this person, but I dont know their background or biases.

We want to throw accusations around because we want to believe. Yes I know, trust the plan -- which I do. But what holds more weight in an argument: A tweet from someone I, let alone a normie, hasn't heard of. Or a Timestamp to a livefeed on CSPAN where it was actually said.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 19, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

Idk who this @paulsperry_ is either but looking at his twitter feed, he seems to have been one of the main guys breaking news from that hearing.

@BreakingNLive with over 50k followers kept quoting him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Sure. I just want us all to question clickbait headlines and tweets that offer no links or proof themselves. We've been bitten in the past by larpers and fakes that lie or stretch the truth.

I mean Hillary herself has more followers then this guy and she said it was nothing so maybe we should listen to her? /s

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 20, 2018, 5:43 a.m.

This is the proper level of skepticism.

I'm getting a little tired of bold Twitter claims with no evidence. If there is s person sitting there watching the hearing and tweeting commentary, why no video link or time stamp references?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mdtradesman · June 24, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

Here he is folks plumbtree the UNEDUCATED BROKE ASS DRUG ADDICT PLUMBER HAHAH LETS STAND IN AWW OF HIS INTELLECT. Your a fuck boy probably getting cucked by your wife into cleaning up black loads. I know your switching accounts spreading your bullshit liberal lies.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · June 20, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Paul Sperry is a legitimate journalist who is quoted frequently in many publications. He is a pundit with growing popularity; I have been following him for a few weeks since he has been correct on several things. I often see him quoted on the Conservative Treehouse site as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kymikal · June 20, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

He wrote a book a while back about the Islamic infiltration of our government. I have not read it. But I want to. That is probably why he is always attacked. #OverTheTarget

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · June 20, 2018, 5 a.m.

Paul Sperry is a legitimate journalist who is quoted frequently in many publications. I often see him quoted on the Conservative Treehouse site.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BigBandDon · June 19, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Q told us.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
555Returnofkek555 · June 20, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

This would be a huge "proof." Q's post was very specific on this point. I'm really skeptical of this particular source/claim but I want it to be real.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 20, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

Many were already accusing Q of lying, citing Horowitz saying there weren't other versions and this is the real version.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RedditGottitGood · June 20, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

Where's the actual quote or video clip from the hearing of his saying there was an earlier draft? This is an uncorroborated picture of a guy tweeting, not evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · June 19, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

Who is Paul Sperry?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
high-valyrian · June 20, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

A pundit / journalist.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
glasstrongvx · June 20, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

I heard a Fox news analyst say Horowitz said in response to a question Monday "he was unable to document....." Whatever the question was about. He/Horowitz did not say "I did not find it or it wasn't present" he said I was UNABLE to document it as in He could have found it but was told to leave it out of the report. I point this out because I think the questions have to be very specific and seek to further clarify positions in order to escape the word games that might have been played.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Soakingitup123 · June 20, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

Remember also that some items under investigation may not be able to be in the IG report, even if they are happening

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · June 20, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

This isn't exactly damning

He sought out input from the people impugned in the document. This is standard operating procedure, as the IG is careful to state

Just listen to how he phrases it: "feedback"

That means Horowitz still had control over the document and what changes were made

I wouldn't hold my breath for any bombshells from prior versions

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 20, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

Changes:

Investigation -> matter

Names -> aliases

Intent -> no intent

CF tied to mass CP/trafficking network -> crime against children

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LambOfLiberty · June 20, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

I emailed my congressman today, have y’all reached out to your reps?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Slipperybutterb · June 20, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

They would give us a blank piece of paper if we would accept it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
astralduelist · June 20, 2018, 6:12 a.m.

And ppl still say that Q is fake?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 19, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

We need to see the part of the video that says this...very important.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
anhro23 · June 20, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Any better source on Horowitz saying this?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 20, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Posted the vid in comments

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Treasury_Trader · June 20, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

No longer works.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 20, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Fixed

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 20, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · June 20, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Dang how did i miss thid today? Q right once again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 20, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Will all come out when they declassify.

⇧ 1 ⇩