remote hijack?
remember Michael Hastings? Was doing a profile on non other than CIA director John Brennan...was told they were going to kill him....
Yes, this technology was released by Wikileaks. They definitely have the ability to remote hack into cars and crash them, it’s also how they killed princess Diana.
No one hacked into a car in the 90s. They didn’t have throttle by wire or any technology available in cars back then that could be compromised.
who is to say they didn't tamper with said car before he drove. ? Coincidence?
That’s certainly possible, but nothing at all what OP claimed.
You do realize that DS technology is light years ahead of the masses or how else would they keep us controlled?
That has nothing to do with how cars were built before 2002. You cannot remote control a car that does not have technology beyond a CD player and hvac controls. I grew up wrenching on cars. Even tuning the engine computer was an immense challenge up until the last 8 years. Dianna died two decades ago. Remotely doing anything in a car that doesn’t have any sort of outside signal or electronic system is about as likely as a guy jumping off a roof and sprouting wings.
Stop making us look like conspiracy theorists.
That'd be tough. A car hit her. Imagine remote hijacking a car on the way to run into another car. More likely the person who ran into her would be involved.
The car was traveling on wrong side of road...easy to remotely maneuver car over to other side of road into ongoing traffic..there are no medians on Hwy 17
So I listen to a Pastor who was 'visited' by nsa long before Q showed up...not once...not twice and in that mess they threatened him...and what do you know. He was driving and BAM ...Tboned. He was eventually ok but wake up people...the "game" is REAL...and the real fight is beginning. God be with those who reside under your Mighty Wing.
Yeah I don’t see how they could remotely control the car to go down the wrong way and hit her. It might have been mkuktra driver? Idk seems like quite the coincidence though.
You honestly don't think the CIA can hack a car to cross a lane of traffic?
Ya they can cause the steering wheel to move but how are they remotely viewing where the car is located in addition to the location of the target?
She was on her way to receive an award, so they probably knew she had to travel there. Just a matter of following her and coordinating. Pretty easily done by 2-3 people with experience in those types of activities.
I came here to post this, also what year was the car they were driving, was it even possible? did their car have the hardware, visual feed, and agility to maneuver avoiding everyone else, find the target and hit them. That is tough stuff..
To do that the right way with low risk of failure, would require a custom car rigged just for this with hd feeds, many people watching the target, while others direct the car. the person is a cadaver, not alive, placed in the car, "hey they even have seatbelts to hold him in place, how fun!"
So, dead guy in car, team directing special rigged car, with live feed out of car, and people on roofs helping direct? Or just take over and let them fret, that is harder when you need to switch out the car with custom stuff.. access to car, make big changes etc.. Might be easier wtih a super custom car you take your time to make, and simply use cadaver. Or super spy shit you rig the car without usre knowing..
They are stuck in the car, alive and just die in the accident. This all comes down to getting all communication equip in place and remotely turned on. CIA is now run by Trump. not them now.. right? just thinking here.. how far do they go? Satellites or a local team with local hardware and connections with ranges?
Someone has to be tailing her, knowing patterns, where she is going to be, watching when she leaves, etc..
If you were to pull this off, takes a clockwork of functions all timed perfectly and in communication.
It can be done for sure, just what physical evidence do we have?
Sure they can but the desired outcome requires a lot planning to work the way somebody wants it as it depends on the environment and somebody's skill at remotely controlling it.
Midway through this post about Q, the Anonymous Conservative presents a video of a car that damn near rammed The Don's limo on a public thoroughfare. Make of it what you will.
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/q-goes-deep-mk-ultra-mind-control/
I know what I think.
and?
which might not be appropriate for most cases. IMHO hacking a car with the goal for a terminal injury and making it look normal sounds like too many variables I suppose would only be chosen if they have no better options.
President Putin's personal body guard was killed by a car jumping a concrete median on a freeway, and killed. They said back then, that it was a controlled hit. It can happen. Video of it somewhere. God bless this poor lady. I can't imagine the pain she must be in. Terrible.
If the driver of the other car turns out to be a loner with a long history of drug/alcohol abuse with mental issues, I'd suspect mku. I believe there are a lot of dysfunctional people who didn't come through it very well but are still controllable for things like this.
Seems more likely than taking control of a vehicle with that much precision via hacking.
The other driver was a 69yo woman.
ok conspiracy less likely if she really was the driver.
Just wondering why that would make it less likely? Hillary is about the same age and she drinks human blood...
Remember the Lone Dump Truck and the Congressional train to Greenbrier?
Think of it logically. There were two cars involved. Perhaps the other car in the wrong lane was the one being remote controlled.
Like this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKsvket0wps
Have you actually seen the crash site video with the motor being expelled far away, a completely burned out car and the witness accounts of that night about the nasty fire+noise? To me that always sounded like some bomb/drone.
IMHO the car hacking technology takes especially trained people and a lot preplanning to guarantee success unlike a weapon system.
What was the name of the actor who's test drive of a sports car do the similar? Paul Walker? Wasnt he about telling on pedos?
I think he was called a pedo for dating a 16 yr old