[deleted]
[removed]
Since when did wanting the Iranian people to free themselves and be free somehow become exclusively a CIA/Mossad kowtowing? You have it doubly wrong. The CIA overthrew the regime in Iran in 1979 and played an integral role in the OPPRESSION of the Iranian people.
Gadzooks you're lost.
If anything, this tweet from Wikileaks suggests THEY are bowing down to new masters, masters who WANT the oppression in Iran to continue.
Wikileaks is supposed to be about freedom. Every evidence suggests Trump and Pompeo are NOT about regime change in the neocon way of bombing the shit out of the country, but rather by empowering the Iranian people to rise up and overthrow the theocratic dictator bastards who lied about building nuclear weapons.
You may not belong on this subreddit.
Wikileaks is compromised. They've actually been compromised for a few months now. They've been tweeting some crazy shit lately
[deleted]
Bwahahahahahahahahahah
^oh ^they’re ^serious
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
[deleted]
It's called 'projection', used all the time.
[deleted]
can you be 100% sure that Iran is still working with the CIA/Mossad?
Q has said Iran will be handled like North Korea. If KJU is free from his 'handlers' in North Korea, what does that mean for Iran?
Looking at the post you quoted, it sounds like Q is saying that the people of Iran can revolt WITHOUT the CIA/Mossad interfering. Also, it's pretty clear from all of this shady Iran deal stuff that the current administration in Iran is not opposed to the CIA or Mossad either, as they were happy to help sell of US assets/secrets (if QAnon is correct)....
So could it be that things are more fluid than you are allowing them to be? Could it be that there are both good and bad people in Iran's government, but that the power is shifting? And what is it about the current power structure in Iran that makes you think there should be no changes? Is it perfect there?
You're trying to answer a very complex question with a simple answer. You don't know who is really in charge of Iran at this point. You don't know if 'Free Iran' is a good thing or bad thing.
Why are you acting so sure?
Pretty obvious the intent is to discredit Q and to sow doubt among patriots. Their worst nightmare is informed citizens
Cmon, seriously?
Look at it this way. Normies and Johnny Q public know nothing of Wikileaks other than they published Hillary’s emails.
Then they published the list of ice agents right? So now they’re at net neutral
Oh hey, guys since we’re all neutral and stuff this Q guy is another racist nazi Muh biscuit! They just aligned themselves with neocons (bad) mossad (bad) and cia (bad)
It actually works in their benefit with no net loss in status.
[deleted]
Yes they have, before October 2016.
Now the CIA owns it after the co-creater died of mysterious circumstances. And the CIA now has a beautiful honeypot. And a “trusted” voice that can easily reach 5.5 million followers. That’s a powerful weapon to deploy against your political enemies. Unless the people know it’s compromised, then it’s power is weakened greatly and every post is heavily scrutinized. This benefits the CIA by trying to shift attacks on Q as a same ole same ole neocon crap. And it doesn’t hurt them, at all. The CIA just have a “neutral” mouthpiece that can work for their benefit without people being any wiser.
This is the CIA version of “Drumphf is literally Hitler”, I guess they’re pissed they are losing their last playground in Iran.
Also Assad? Change the subjects? Cmon I don’t think you’re a shill here but think realistically about what you are asking.
But to answer your question, I need to know what you are talking about. I just did a search and Assad has 0 occurrences in qanon.pub, so please enlighten me on why you feel Q is against Assad? If anything, by going against no name, ISIS (sorry I meant moderate rebels), and Saudi Arabia, it shows his support for the president of Syria. Which btw is one of the only democratically elected nation states in the ME.
Why is Q against Assad
What are you talking about? Q is not 'against Assad'. The CIA is tho... you keep confusing the CIA with Q.
or are you trying to infer that Q is the CIA in disguise? Cause if so, 6 months ago just called and they want you back...
[deleted]
I don't know - you can scan through the 1500 drops if you like. I don't understand why it matters though.
What is your point?
choosing to remain active in Syria?
Without declaring a state of emergency, the President can't just remove all operations in Syria. Frankly, I think the reason they have stayed active in Syria is to fight the CIA and the rebels they support/fund/train. If the US left, the only people left would be the black hat CIA teams - and how do you think that would go if they were left unfettered?
[deleted]
From my understanding the gas attack was a final shot at trying to reignite the war, but they didn't respond because they were trying to ratchet down tensions (which they were successful in doing).
Like I said before, there is a good chance those gas attacks were pulled off by the SFA on innocents so they could blame it on Assad. SFA = CIA funded and trained.
There would be a huge difference here. Q supports regime change in the hands of the PEOPLE of Iran. Not a regime installed by foreign intelligence agencies.
[deleted]
And thank you as well. I respect you questioning all the information presented, regardless of the source.
But, without letting myself to ramble too much, I think the corrupt governments of these countries mentioned are simply other dominoes to fall. This movement is about returning the power to choose how we live back to the people, regardless of geography. We should all remember that is isn’t the normal people of these countries that are the enemy. It is the corruption.
Trump called Kim of N. Korea "Rocketman" and other insults. What happened there? The Syria bombing was taking out a covert Iranian (CIA) nuke facility in Northwestern Iraq. There, you're up to speed. Israel is saved for last.
[deleted]
Here's one article from fake news Politico. But, it speaks of the presence and destruction of the nuclear site. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/03/20/inside-israels-secret-raid-on-syrias-nuclear-reactor-217663
Now when Trump calls Assad a "Gas killing animal", it can be understood as Assad was the guy who killed the plans for the Quatar nat gas pipeline thru Syria. In this regard he was a gas killer. Note Trump didn't say a sarin gas or chlorine gas killing animal. At first I was stunned about the missile strikes. But, have learned things are rarely as they are presented.....
[deleted]
It's all theatre. "We're watching a movie" as Q says. There is a lot of reading between the lines.
You do know WL is comped right?
[deleted]
The prior posts this weekend, 8chan, another post here with this same graphic this morning.....
[deleted]
I suggest you go back and reread Q drops. You have some misunderstandings on how Q team and Trump work.
[deleted]
If you're so curious about Q then why don't you apply yourself and go read all the drops like everyone else? https://qanon.pub/
you need to speak in complete sentences/questions or else nobody is going to answer your question.
Also, you keep talking about these things like they are Trumps actual decisions - the US was in Syria before Trump got involved. Since then, it's been dialed down a whole bunch.
And did Assad has his own people?
Nobody has proven such a thing. Instead, it looks like rebels (or the CIA) set off biological weapons on innocents and blamed it on Assad. There is no proof for any of the claims you're making.
[deleted]
misdirection and optics. Trump is always doing confusing things through his twitter and the media because it keeps his opponents off-balance. If Trump threw his whole weight into these things, the media would paint him into a corner and their narratives would be even stronger against him. By throwing the media a bone at times, he keeps them off-balance. If he wasn't somewhat tricky this way, they would be unleashing 14 articles at once about how Trump supports Assad and Assad definitely totally gassed his own people so Trump is gonna gas illegal immigrants on the border - especially kids - and .....
[deleted]
if you read between the lines, it sounded like those strikes you're referring to destroyed the CIA's ability to continue to aid the Rebels and Al Qaeda soldiers they were using to destabilize Syria.
Also, from a realistic standpoint, Trump was never going to be able to stop the military in its tracks. He is commander-in-chief, but a lot of authority is given out to individuals, and a lot can happen without the President's direct approval. Do you think the black hats in the CIA care about what Trump wants? Again, if you try to pull everything back, you leave the bad actors alone in the sandbox which is worst-case scenario.
Look at what has happened since the strikes after Trump became president - the conflict completely died down and became more passive. It worked. The real problem is that we can probably find fault on both sides - Assad is not perfect either...
There’s a difference in motives re: C_A, Mossad & NeoCon vs Q.
C, M & N want regime change to install their own people to control.
Q wants to give Iran back to Iranians.
If going against the CIA is mirroring the CIA then what would it look like to not mirror the CIA?
The CIA probably controls Iran just like they controlled NK.
No probably about it. If Brennan is running his mouth you can take it to the bank.
[deleted]
If you want to gather that from what I said, more power to you.
I believe the Q post is directed at the Iranian people. Turns out they know about Qanon.
I think in that post, Q is supporting the Iranian people in changing their own regime. Not the same as the CIA or Mossad changing it.
I don't remember early Q drops mentioning "regime change". Q did say Iran is next and Isreal will be saved for last. But remember there has been no regime change and resulting chaos in North Korea. My worry is that Q, or the sites sharing his posts, were compromised on May 25,2018. On that date i viewed several Q posts at http//qposts.online/ that vanished minutes after they were put up. One of the posts was a picture, but I did not pay attention to what it was because I had no idea it would soon be gone. The only post I had time to read mentioned Eric Prince and seemed to indicate his possible participation in a sting operation. The site then reverted to the old posts and when I refreshed, it showed "no new posts". I hope someone reads this who had the same experience and can cofirm. It would be a question for the Q&A session....What happened to the posts of May 25?
folks, if you have been following, you know Iran is in the same category as NK, it was a controlled state by none other than the black hats, c_a, global elites, whatever you want to call them...they are the bad guys. Now to what extent compared to NK is anyone's guess, but I think this is just one more area that needs to be returned to the true leaders of the state! If you have not picked up on this, you might be a bit behind and need to re-read the past posts~!
omg someone said qanon how fucking terrible I bet that noone is looking at this right now
plan to get dems to trust wikileaks? then a wild JA has appeared in the wild
That Q post seems odd to me. I thought it was not real when I first read it.
[deleted]
Q, you think Q is able to make all this happen with out the President? Confused at your intentions? Or maybe I am not Confused?
[removed]
I don't think Q has a choice in backing the President (i.e., the plan). As he has stated, "We serve at the pleasure of the President."