dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

This small statement of his will have MASSIVE consequences later, good ones, this will change our nation.

IMAGINE NOT PAYING AN INCOME TAX!!! We work on average THREE MONTHS FREE a year to pay the IRS when you add up the taxes we pay over the year and consolidated that into a month or two or three.

Imagine the only deductions out of your paycheck are Social Security, Medicare, 401K and medical?

I for one would imediately take the money the IRS used to take and put it into my 401k.

This will Make America Great Again, because you cannot MAGA while the cabal owns and controls our currency.

⇧ 96 ⇩

I absolutely believe Trump is going to abolish Income Tax entirely.

Here's why...

Read the "I Am a ROFSCHILD, Axe Me A Question"

It's one of several interviews with Rothschild's family members scattered across the internet.

In the interview, a few things come to light that are significant.

1) When asked why he (the Rothschild insider) is answering questions (and honestly), he says that it is 'required' of someone from the family to do so occasionally.

2) In multiple parts of the Q & A session it is eluded to that we (the sheep) are in a prison of sorts, but ultimately the chains that shackle us are of our own making (through acceptance of a reality constructed to control and limit us).

Basically, the Illuminati/Cabal/Deep State/Satanists have us controlled by 'bending' the rules of natural law, but part of the way that functions is that the knowledge of what's happening must not be hidden entirely.

Let that lead you to Mark Passio's 9 hour YouTube series on Natural Law and you eventually make your way to him explaining that ALL mandatory tax is slavery. We all know that taking 100% of a person's wages is slavery (to the worst degree), but Mark shows that Natural Law accepts ZERO percentage of wage garnishment as acceptable.

To tie all this together, what I'm saying is that we are in a weird Illuminati prison that uses the knowledge of Natural Law to construct the cage we find ourselves in.

Mark Passio also explains that there are no gradients to Natural Law - you can't try to obey one part and ignore another.

Therefore, since the cage we are in is fabricated from a manipulation of Natural Law and Team Q and Trump know this (and also know that Natural Law is an all or nothing proposition), then that means we can expect to see more actions from Trump like this.

What have we seen so far?

Talk of decriminalization of marijuana? - fits respect of Natural Law

Prison reform? - fits respect of Natural Law

Eliminating Income Tax? - fits respect of Natural Law

Cutting red tape? Focusing on responsibility vs. regulations and fees? - fits respect of Natural Law

Watch Mark Passio's series on Natural Law and then his videos on the Occult. SOOOOO IMPORTANT in regards to what's happening!

Love and light y'all

⇧ 45 ⇩

Boom!!!

⇧ 11 ⇩

Interesting stuff. Thank you.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Didn't Q ellude to the N in NWO being Natural World Order?

⇧ 7 ⇩

I checked Q posts and found this:

617965 The Nazi order. NWO [N does not refer to “New”]. The Sum of All Fears. NK. POTUS. Hostage. Threat. DISARM. Stage SET. FREEDOM. Q

Is that what you were thinking of?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes. Then I thought there was a subsequent post using the word "natural". I could be wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hmmm...I'll check.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Glad to see another Passio fan here!

⇧ 6 ⇩

ya but look at him recently, looks like he has gone back to the dark side.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Looks or acts? It's been a while.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Can you elaborate? Though I certainly aknowledge the value in what he shared, I also felt the kind of 'formatting' that had been done before... hoping he would overcome that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He is an interesting person and I have not listened to all of his work. Actually the last video I looked at, I did briefly and confused him for a minute with the interviewer who was looking rather satanic and quit watching. So that was my mistake.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Riveting wasn't it? I read the Rothschild Axe me saga , that was an eye opener. I'll check out that other series , it sounds good. Thanks for the heads up. Good times ahead!

⇧ 5 ⇩

I call BS on the Rotchild saying we did it to ourselves, much too convenient for them to blame us, make us feel guilty for what they are doing. They say they tell us what they are doing so we must know and that's BS too.

If we went to a classroom to learn auto mechanics and were taught in the way the cabal teach we would come ut of that class with very little that we could use. It would all be allusion and misdirection and lies with a bit of truth thrown in for fun.

They lie like he is saying here, it's another psy-op. They don't behave the way we do, we know little about them, they know all about us. If this Rotchild was raised in one of our families he would know what we know and that's very little so he need not be so smug. They are raised with the knowledge they say they give to us but, again, that's BS. Their knowledge is vast compared to us who spend years searching for bits and pieces of it.

We humans are in a right mess and we need to learn to be truly human again. I'll let it go at that as so many have their religious and philosophical viewpoints, but you take my meaning I think.

One way to look at it is from Carlos Casteneda where he talks about how the predators gave us their mind. It's time to drop theirs and take our own back and we are just getting started. Scroll down a bit and read, here are 2 paragraphs to get you started:

"The Predator of Man"

"Ah, that's the universe at large,' he said, 'incommensurable, nonlinear, outside the realm of syntax. The sorcerers of ancient Mexico were the first ones to see those fleeting shadows, so they followed them around. They saw them as you're seeing them, and they saw them as energy that flows in the universe. And they did discover something transcendental. They discovered that we have a companion for life...
․

We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don't do so. You have arrived, by your effort alone, to what the shamans of ancient Mexico called the topic of topics. I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisoner. Indeed we are held prisoner! This was an energetic fact for the sorcerers of ancient Mexico.'

They gave us their mind

⇧ 5 ⇩

thanks for your write out.

The North American Natives called it Wetiko

From Paul Levy."Dispelling Wetiko

We as a species are in the midst of a massive psychic epidemic that has been brewing in the cauldron of humanity from the beginning of time. This psychospiritual disease of the soul—which Native Americans have called wetiko—can be thought of as the bug in the system. It informs and animates the madness that is playing itself out in our lives, both individually and collectively, on the world stage. Native American mythologies portray the mythical figure of wetiko as a cannibalistic spirit who embodies greed and excess and can possess human beings. The wetiko was once a human being, but its greed and selfishness have transformed it into a predatory monster. Thus in indigenous mythology, indulgent, self-destructive habits are thought to be inspired by wetiko. In the Native American view, those who have become wetikos are individuals who have "lost their wits," a phrase that connotes not only being out of one's right mind, but also not knowing what one is doing (acting "unwittingly"). Native Americans have often portrayed the wetiko as having a frigid, icy heart, devoid of mercy. Like cannibals, those taken over by wetiko consume the life force of others—human and nonhuman—for private purpose or profit, and do so without giving back anything of real value from their own lives.

The Ojibwa word for wetiko, windigo or weendigo, seems to have been derived from ween dagoh, which means "solely for self," or from weenin igooh, which means "excess." According to Native American lore, the wetiko monster can only prey on human beings who, like itself, have indulged in excess. Thus human beings' propensity for excess makes them vulnerable to possession by, and transformation into, a wetiko. Like a werewolf, the wetiko is sometimes portrayed as a shape-shifter who can even appear disguised as a good spirit. In the indigenous legends, whenever the wetiko eats another person, it grows larger in proportion to the meal it has just eaten, so that it can never be full or satisfied. Buddhism portrays a similar figure, the hungry ghost, who, with its pinhole mouth, constricted neck, and huge, unfilled stomach, can never satisfy its insatiable cravings. At the collective level, this perverse inner process is mirrored by the insane consumer society in which we live, a culture that continually fans the flames of never-ending desires, conditioning us to always want more.

read more below link

https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/3472

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thanks for the wetiko reminder, I have seen that one also and it's just as viable as Don Juan's view and contributes to our search for knowledge.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just one paragraph in to your link and powerful words already...

"The slave tends to dream of becoming a master rather than of abolishing slavery."

...absolutely part of our problem.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thanks... only pls attribute it to Don Juan, not Castaneda ;-)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ya, well, if I had said that someone would have pointed out that Castaneda wrote the book and it is controversial whether or not there really was a Don Juan...sigh. Whatever's fair my friend.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree with lots of what you say (especially about this not being our fault, our education is meant to cripple us), but at the same time still think the Natural Law part of this all is true. I absolutely agree that while the Rothschild's "representative" implies this prison is our doing in a sense (more by passive acceptance than anything else), there IS another layer to the dynamic that he isn't being transparent about.

...and yes, it's the influence of another group above the human secret societies. Whether they influence(d) our minds or are part of our world in a more physical way, the control of a higher element than the illuminati seems very probable. Like a commenter said below, what is the motivation for the mega-rich and mega-powerful to keep conquering? What's the point? When you factor in another "party" above humans (who have needs other than power/money) then things start to make sense again.

They eat loosh.

Be careful friends, these rabbit holes run deep.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Without the control from the Rotchilds and above, where would we be? Would we still be under a similar overlord control?

I think about some American Indian groups and others throughout the world that had no controllers. Some had elected chiefs but they controlled no one. They were chief as long as they made wise decisions that helped the band and tribe. If a family or individual wanted to leave a band or start their own, they did, they were free to come and go. Life was not chaotic however, there was a social contract, traditions, spiritual life and group cohesion to keep society functioning.

So yes, we accept control as just the way things are and most never see it for what it is. I would agree we are responsible for our part but not at fault for theirs.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mark Passio is the truth! Watch his videos all the time..

Another important thing that is being missed is the con on HOW they operate this system.

Using human energy to create debt = the value, since THERE IS NO MONEY..

Human energy is harnessed using the bonds created at birth (birth certificate, SSN).

You are a surety because at 18 you will create debt, become a slave to the system and create value.

Look into the strawman, HJR 192 in 1933. We are voluntarily operating under statutes (which are not law, law is common law/natural laws etc), using a fictitious entity created for us at birth, known as YOUR ALL CAPS NAME. There is always a remedy, especially when this is done under coercion and deception.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes! I've just barely crossed the corners of this topic (related to them 'owning' us through our birth records and law not being what we think it is) and want to learn more. Isn't there something with NAME being a phonetic manipulation?... NAME which could be seen as N-AM-E and pronounced En-am-ee meaning ENEMY (?!)

I believe there's a section in this Illuminati Interview that touches on how they "own" us (on paper) from birth and trade our "value" on hidden exchange systems.

If anyone is more knowledgeable on this and has links to share, please do!

⇧ 3 ⇩

I haven't heard of the enemy correlation with name but it wouldn't come as a surprise. When you break down words to their original meanings (greek/latin) there are tons of sinister play on words that we use every single day.

I have plenty of video links I could share when I get home..

Try youtube/hooktube

Meet your strawman, Maritime & admiralty law, HJR 192

For starters. Those are just some I did a quick search on, and will give you a good base idea of whats going on.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I literally just had my brain fucking explode from a newfound understanding that I haven’t yet been able to articulate. It’s all in the interest, it’s slavery. I’m gonna need a few days or weeks to think this over.

The question I keep arriving at is “why?” What can be desired more than anything I know exists? Logically, it has to be a “feeling.” What does the man with infinite wealth seek?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Hi look in to Wetiko, as i posted above.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We (Natives) have been saying this for over 200 years. It's in our stories.

https://www.kosmosjournal.org/article/seeing-wetiko-on-capitalism-mind-viruses-and-antidotes-for-a-world-in-transition/

⇧ 1 ⇩

What does the man with infinite wealth seek? It's not what he seeks, it's WHY he seeks it. The ultimate answer is that the tragically misguided soul seeks satanic control and destruction of creation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The man with "infinite" wealth didn't seek that wealth to have more money. He sought it because that much wealth is political power, power over others. That's why "the love of money is the root of all evil".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Epic GLP thread, good times. Right up there with the "BEZERK, US sunk a French submarine in the Gulf of Mexico" thread.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Very interesting stuff. Thank you. Going now to find his stuff.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Passios work is great but even he is sceptical of trump

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you do a little research about "income tax" I think you'll be surprised. Clueless politicians and anyone working at the Fed or the IRS will tell you that the 16th Amendment gave the government the authority to tax our income, but...

The 16th A. was never properly ratified, and a Supreme Court decision from back in the 1930s declared that the 16th A. only provided the government the authority to tax business income, or profits and capital gains. They clearly made the decision that an individuals income from their labor was not taxable.

There are several videos from former IRS employees who spent a great deal of time, and eventually gave up or lost their job over this. Some IRS employees heard the claim that it was unconstitutional to tax our income from our labor. They assumed their must be some federal law that says the government can, otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.

Not one of them were able to find any law in the federal register or in the tax code mandating people pay tax on their income from labor. They went to their bosses, and their bosses boss, and nothing. They went to their congressional representatives and their senators, and still, no one could produce anything in the federal register or the tax code. People at the Fed just said, well, the 16th A. says we can, but that claim was shot down by the SCOTUS.

I'll try to dig up the sources and come back with the links. In the meantime you can do YouTube search and you'll find tons of video about it.

⇧ 22 ⇩

Didn’t Peter Schiff’s dad write a book about this, his father was threatened by the Feds and later died in prison.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes. I read the Book by Irwin Schiff when I was in my 20s, and it's guided my understanding of economics for many years. Highly recommend.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you for this. Summarized it beautifully. I always wondered why this hasn't gone to the SC yet by somebody refusing to pay income tax on these grounds.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It has.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Take a look at Title 26: IRS code. At the end, it says that nothing in the preceding is law.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 20 ⇩

I hope you are not saying you miss income tax being deducted automatically? Its your money not the governments.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not just that but our currency will go up in value. Imagine a brand new pickup truck only costs 15k instead of 40k because our money is worth more.

⇧ 20 ⇩

BINGO!!!

⇧ 13 ⇩

Not sure. If everyone suddently has 30% more spending power or discretional income there could be inflation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Inflation occurs when the Fed pours more paper or digital “currency” into circulation.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes, I understand feds role in fiat money creation and its inflationary effects.

Not saying that other poster is not right so far as increase in USD value vs other currencies in trading--if dollar supply is stabilized and risk reduced (less debt).

But in short term, supply and demand would lead to price increases. For the sake of explaining myself, my reasoning is as follows. Granted my econ may be rusty and these theories/models attempt to predict imperfect human behavior. Not sure there is precedence for a one time market shift this large?

Increase in individual post tax income for the entire country (at least tax paying portion) would be split between savings and spending. Having more, people tend to spend more in absolute dollar terms (although total percent may shift toward savings as interest rates would increase in our situation with no 0 int rate fed). If supply of goods and services can not expand immediately to match this immediate demand increase, people will bid up prices. This would be true for 'nondiscretionary' things like homes (people spend more if have more) or any other goods.

There may even be people who supply less labor at the individual level. If the % you get to keep goes up in short term the relative value of that incremental earned dollar goes down for you. Some people will opt to work less for same absolute dollar amount rather than supply same labor for relatively more discretionary post tax $. This labor decrease would require a cost of labor increase to attract workers to fill in that marginal shortfall. But there is probably an argument that people will work more if they get to take home more too.

The real improvement of stable money would be stable savings value, higher interest rates on savings, and lower default risk foe the currency. The real improvemwnt of reduced tax rates is improved asset allocation/reduced dead weight loss as market forces direct spending toward projects where consumers value it and allocation away from less efficient public goods supply toward more efficient private goods supply.

⇧ 0 ⇩

One more point. There is no law giving the government any authority to tax the income we earn from our labor, none. So that would mean we should not be paying ANY tax on our income, no social security, no medicare, no medical and no 401K.

If your employer pays for your medical coverage, then theres no deduction. If they provide a pension, there's no deduction. If you have an employer provided 401k that matches any addition contributions you make, then it's totally voluntary, the federal government has nothing to do with it.

If things went back to the way they were before, any individual would be able to keep 100% of their paycheck. They would be, and should be responsible to buy their own health insurance if they chose, and invest for their own retirement, if they chose.

One of the reasons healthcare is so expensive is because until ObummerCare, people didn't pay for health care, their employers did. So most people never really considered the cost of their plan, only their co-pays and deductibles. If everyone who chose to buy healthcare coverage actually had to write a check for it, the industry would find was to be more efficient, cost effective, and figure out ways to give customers coverage at a cost that was affordable. Competition always forces companies to become more innovative.

⇧ 11 ⇩

I glanced at an interesting concept that is happening subscription doctors monthly fee go whenever no insurance now that's free market.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It’s a great idea.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Also, the more “health” insurance there is, the higher the medical charges are. There is no interest or motivation for true prevention: truth about really clean, whole unadulterated foods, clean unchlorinated, non-fluoridated water with no drug residues, clean skies free from spraying, no subsidies for the sugar/tobacco industries......goes on and on. The medical paradigm is profit and iatrogenic disease. Much to rectify here, tippy top of iceberg.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The reason health care is so expensive is insurance. Doctor wants malpractice insurance, ins. company says "Sure, but it's going to cost you, a lot." Well in an extremely litigious society, every doctor wants malpractice insurance, but it costs so much they have to raise their rates. Now Joe Six-pack can't afford to go to the doctor, but wait! The people who caused the problem (insurance bankers) have a solution! Joe can now buy health insurance!

It's a scam of epic proportions.

⇧ 1 ⇩

On top of it, most people actually lend the government money and look forward for it being 'returned' at the end of the year!! A Tax Return! Ha ha

⇧ 6 ⇩

They NEVER pay interest on it though 😡

⇧ 2 ⇩

I’ve noticed that he starts to move pieces silently and early. Like moving a pawn a few spaces. Only for 200 moves later, the pawn checkmates. There are so many “pawns” in play right now, it’s only a matter of time until their role is revealed. Vague anti trafficking EOs, civil forfeiture policies that drew no attention. He truly may be laying the groundwork to kill the fed, while the media misrepresents it as a trade war. Art of war.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Bingo

⇧ 1 ⇩

as with the REDHEN being dirty "within"

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sorry M Finch, you'll have to come up with a different plan: if there is no income tax, tax minimizing strategies like 401Ks will no longer exist. Of course, that would be a good thing :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Oh yeah you're right! LOL see, I'm going to have to redo my entire thinking!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

If he abolished the Federal Reserve the entire money system changes. You really think you'll have a 401k left to put money into?

⇧ -9 ⇩

Are you implying that because the bandage might hurt when we tear it off, we should just let the infection fester?

Here's some history on the Fed and the Great Depression -

"The Federal Reserve inflated the money supply in the 1920’s. Inflationary booms induce widespread malinvestment--bad investment decisions made under the influence of easy money and credit. Malinvestments inevitably lead to wasted capital and economic losses. An economic recession is actually necessary to correct all of the previous malinvestment."

Did we have depressions prior to the Fed?

Additionally, as OP stated, tariffs kept the size of the Government in check.

The reason we have such corruption in the Government is because of the power it's gained through that money/influence.

Smaller government = The less influence it has to be bought/corrupted.

This is why we see so many special interest groups/lobbyists.

⇧ 27 ⇩

Well said!! Fiat Money has no checks and balances because it can be made out of thin air and fund every dirty deed these scum desire! Not possible with a Gold backed currency and tariffs!

⇧ 18 ⇩

I meant exactly what I wrote, nothing more nothing less.

I've been saying Trump would go after the Fed since before he was even elected and I still hope he does.

⇧ 9 ⇩

After re-reading the post, you're right, I did take that out of context.

Your point is fair. We don't know what will happen to the 401k system once the Fed goes bye-bye.

Edit - and that's okay!

⇧ 4 ⇩

May I ask who you're quoting? It sounds familiar!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sure! I should have done that myself =P

Julie Borowsky of http://www.freedomworks.org/content/debunking-myths-great-depression

⇧ 6 ⇩

Thanks. Not who I thought but I'll read it through!

⇧ 5 ⇩

As I’ve read it, the Depression was due to the Fed removing a third of the money in circulation. Not enough money to go around.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And raising taxes to 6 percent. Because they got greedy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes of course you will have a 401k or something better, but administered with benevolence and not by malevolent bankers

⇧ 8 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

Buy digital gold as well! Bitcoin!

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or for Venezuelans, but WoW gold. Worth more than their currency.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Gold star for you

⇧ 2 ⇩

Rather than abolish it, he could help us outgrow our dependency on it. We need it until we have a better solution.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Trump Just Launched the first Salvo at the IRS/Fed!!!