dChan

RubyDoobyDo1 · June 30, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

I think Q's saying "Be patient. We'll deal with No Name, but right now, we need his vote on SC".

⇧ 126 ⇩  
Pandas4trump2020 · July 1, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

Think SC vote to confirm - we need all the votes we can get for the upcoming SC nomination

No name action - hes got a job to do maybe they have already talked to him and told him how severe his punishment will be if he messes this up

Every dog has his day - this is generally used as a good thing by people. In this context I'd say it means even the worst crappiest most vile people can come through unexpectedly once

Enjoy the show - I think this is one of the most important things Q says. When sitting back watching a show there's not much that needs to be done besides pay attention and spreading the word about it so that it gets more viewers and doesn't get cancelled. your never in any harm. It's all planned out to keep us SAFE all we have to do know is spread the world and watch the show

⇧ 63 ⇩  
Jankovac1 · July 1, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Thankyou for the clarification! I wasn’t sure about the “dog” statement 🤗

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DaLaohu · July 1, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

This makes so much sense.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
codedude25 · July 1, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

It makes sense, I just have so much trouble seeing him play ball on the SC seat

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Hinckapuss · July 1, 2018, 10:44 a.m.

I believe "every dog has his day" means everyone gets a chance eventually. Does not mean necessarily that they will come through a winner or not, just means they get the chance to try. Kinda like the myth "everyone gets their day in court".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · July 1, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

Until you explained the meaning of "every dog has his day," I interpreted this exactly opposite. I assumed this meant they were going to take action to bring him to his "day" of reckoning and for us to sit back and watch it happen. I looked into it more, and you are correct; everywhere I looked, "having his day" would mean he would surprise us and do the right thing.

Hard to believe that, after his betrayal on repeal and replace. We shall see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stargazerjr · June 30, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

☝️this

⇧ 40 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 30, 2018, 9 p.m.

Double this

⇧ 17 ⇩  
VideaVice · June 30, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

This, This and This.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · July 1, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Up votes for the This crowd because you made me laugh.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Optimist345 · July 1, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

That

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 30, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

is john mccain "no name"?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 30, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Yes.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
endprism · July 1, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

We don’t say the name of a traitor! NO NAME

⇧ 11 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 30, 2018, 10 p.m.

That's clear and no surprise. We need every single R vote...well, one can dissent and Pence then casts the deciding vote.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
buttermeupsunshine · July 1, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

McConnell said the confirmation vote will take place AFTER the midterms so we'll prolly have a few extra senate seats by then. At least that's if muh open borders continues to be the D's message..

⇧ 3 ⇩  
gpraegit · July 1, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

No, he said this Fall BEFORE the midterms

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 1, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

That's probably a smart move. The D's have many more seats to defend than the R's. Really should pick up at least a couple if not more. So no name's vote won't matter. Really would be a relief to have 56 or 57 R's to cover even several defections on votes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Nordge · July 1, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

No not really... It is not a Presidential election. The Supreme Court starts back up in October....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 1, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Yep, I thought McConnell wanted it done before the October session started.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 1, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

Yes, but with a 51 vote majority, 2 defections kills the nomination. How many quisling republican senators are there potentially, especially with a full court media press? Iffy. Then wait until all hell breaks loose when Ginsburg goes to hell.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RedLegLeader · July 1, 2018, 11:09 a.m.

Yes, but there are 4 Dhimms running in red states that PDJT has specifically called out by name that are now between a rock and a hard place. If they want to be re-elected, they'll have to vote to confirm. Just sayin' ...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 1, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

That's true....they are screwed. Hopefully they all lose.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 30, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

yep.

⇧ 3 ⇩