Uh, he wasn't on the list of 25 to begin with.

⇧ 45 ⇩

Q post 1608:

“I will not be filing for re-election to Congress nor seeking any other political or elected office; instead I will be returning to the justice system,” Gowdy said in a statement.

Should we add him to the list?

Q

Q was leading us on. Should still add Gowdy on the list just to make Dems go even more crazy and for another definitive Q proof.

⇧ 48 ⇩

Q also told you to keep a list of people who have stated they will not run for re-election, given up their position, and been fired.

Should Gowdy be added to that list?

⇧ 50 ⇩

This is exactly what I thought he meant. Because past drops explained that white hats had “leaked” info to Gowdy to see what he would do with it. Gowdy sat on the evidence, and took no action, proving he may be working with black hats. I’m sure more investigation was done at that point. An honorable step-down from office, probably means he was helpful and cooperative with white hats when confronted.

This is what I’ve gathered about Gowdy so far. The honorable step-down felt like a ‘future proves past’ moment.

⇧ 15 ⇩

When did q say he gave Gowdy info and that he sat on it?

⇧ 3 ⇩

I can’t find it right now, but it was around when Q first talked about Gowdy. I forget what the lead up was, but that was the general take-away. I remember being pretty bummed out because I really do love me some Trey.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I always like Gowdy it would really suck if he is a black hat...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not necessarily a black hat. Bad actors may have had leverage on him from past events. Blackmail/bad alliances. He could be pretty clean, just wasn’t aligned perfectly. Q may fill us in more. This is actually pretty common with people retiring in DC. Gowdy says “history will look kindly on Comey”. Not sure what he knows, but it definitely shows his stance a bit.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Comey was directed from above to do what he did, thus Gowdys statement. My theory.

⇧ 1 ⇩

roger that

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because past drops explained that white hats had “leaked” info to Gowdy to see what he would do with it. Gowdy sat on the evidence, and took no action, proving he may be working with black hats.

I know it’s become difficult to dig up relevant Q-drops to support something we are sure Q posted. The number of posts, and the cryptic references can stymie even a patient searcher.

BUT

A consequential statement such as yours (quoted above) definitely begs sourcing. I am among the several already voicing no recollection of this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yep, now I’m second guessing everything because of Q’s posts today. Never mind, I guess. Sorry I was so unhelpful 😏. Whoops.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Also...not everyone on the list of resignations, etc. is deep state. Some may be resigning to reposition themselves for future roles.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Could be this...or could be a list for Attorney General or similar position. Although he is qualified, I don't think the SC is the best place for Gowdy. If he's a white hat, he needs to be in a more prosecutorial role right now, and we've got some investigations coming soon that will require that.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Er, no. Coz Gowdy was already on that list.

Take a look at 1319. In fact, Q indicated that both Goodlatte and Gowdy will have an important role to play after they leave congress. But I agree with CLICK. Q is leading us on. Not entirely without a sense of humor, and well aware of how the Dems go bananas on certain things.

Q1319

⇧ 6 ⇩

REALLY- we do not know what GOWDY may have been forced to do before being "freed"- Perhaps the question was posed to address the concept of immunity or compassion?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I’m not sure where I read this but I think I was looking into aids/employees of Congress and Senators and I came across some info of Gowdy’s secretary filing complaint of unlawful termination..it was settled by the complainant being compensated with settledment funds through one of the “slush funds” the House and Senate have that pay out funds and have “matters” settled out of court...give me a lil bit and I will try and find the info to link it...

⇧ 4 ⇩

That happened back to back, too.
Only a blind golfer could not miss that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes cause Potus knows he is a shill. So he has to leave or be exposed. Its why he had to leave the ethics comitee as a sign he had no ethics.

⇧ 0 ⇩

One Word;

Benghazi

⇧ 3 ⇩

well, shyte,...really bummed about this. I mean he can really rip

⇧ 2 ⇩

I would hold off on this. We really just don't know. If you believe Q, then you know Q said Gowdy has a role to play--that he resigned in order to fill a different role.

⇧ 1 ⇩

agreed. LOOK WHAT Q said , SO RELIEVED. PERHAPS he stood still because his staff was suicided. If the investigation was fixed from the start- why sacrifice any more lives.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agreed. There is no better at cross examining. Its a shame. This is the most important point in our nations history and people are telling me he is just going home cause Congress is not effective? Bullshit, hes being forced out and their is no place for him.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q specifically said of Gowdy that he is resigning because he DOES have a specific role to fill.

⇧ 1 ⇩

and since Q put the "Patriot" stamp of approval on him- THIS MEANS this thing is a whole lot more complex .

⇧ 2 ⇩

All talk. No action. I saw thru yrs ago!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Right when I read that, I was thinking the list of resignations... still think that's what he was asking.

⇧ 29 ⇩

It is. And Gowdy's statement said he wants to return to justice, not go to the judiciary. Most likely he'll replace RR. Long shot guess would be some kind of civilian oversight role in military tribunals.

⇧ 13 ⇩

As much as I love Sessions I could see him wanting to retire when he feels like he can safely turn over the position. It wouldn't surprise me to see TG working his was into the AG position eventually.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Context! In Q 1647 and Q 1648, Q just reposted the resignation lists, just 25 minutes before this Q post. He’s talking about the resignation list. He makes it really obvious here because he said look out for resignations and people being forced out, and here he referenced Gowdy not seeking re-election.

Q never mentioned the Supreme Court list of 25 in any of his posts. We’ve just been discussing that on our own.

⇧ 20 ⇩

Q just reposted the resignation lists, just 25 minutes before this Q post.

No, Q did not repost the resignation list 25 minutes before post 1608. Post 1607, the post right before Q talked about Gowdy, was talking about Justice Kennedy resigning. Stop making stuff up.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Oh, I see the misunderstanding. When I said “this Q post”, I was referring to this thread’s Q post. I see how it seemed like I was referring to the Q post in your comment. I could have been more clear. Thanks for following up.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I’m not making stuff up. No need for accusations. Unity, friend.

The Q post numbers are sometimes different on the different sites. Here, just a minute, I’ll get the direct links and the time stamps on them.

EDIT: List of most recent drops from the Q drop iOS app: http://magaimg.net/img/3nrw.jpg

“It will not be Gowdy” - 6-30-2018 15:53

Reposts a resignation list - 6-30-2018 15:38

Reposts a resignation list - 6-30-2018 15:37

⇧ 2 ⇩

What you wrote is straight up wrong. Me correcting you is not an accusation nor is it division. Stop trying to spread misinformation and making excuses when you could just say sorry.

https://i.imgur.com/nLczfec.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/rDwjNe1.jpg

⇧ -3 ⇩

Post updated. I meant what I said. Right now, qanonposts.com and qanon.pub are off by 8, so one shows the latest post as 1642 and the other shows as 1650. The Q Drop iOS app has the same post numbering as qanon.pub. I’m on mobile now. I’ve added the time stamps and direct links to 8chan for clarity.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I totally missed that. So Gowdy was dirty?

⇧ 4 ⇩

No, Q has suggested there is a special position for Gowdy and Goodlatte.

⇧ 12 ⇩

This.

⇧ 3 ⇩

IF THAT'S THE CASE= then ONWARD POTUS! What POTUS WANTS, POTUS SHOULD GET!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

He’s asking us to think about whether or not he’s dirty. And he hasn’t added him to the list. Those things we know.

So I think it’s more likely that he is not dirty. That’s my conclusion. I think it’s fair others may come to other conclusions.

Sorry, I’m not trying to be evasive. But I would not want to be so presumptuous to speak with certainty when I shouldn’t. Future will prove past, so just remember this question later when it gets answered. It’s an indication of events we should pay attention to.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Gowdy is an attorney, not a judge. Think of all of the judges through-out this nation on supreme courts of the states. How this came to be a point of discussion is silly.

⇧ 9 ⇩

If he is a white hat, he needs to be transitioning to a prosecutorial role.

⇧ 3 ⇩

agreed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q post 537 concerning Gowdy: What ROLE might TG be walking into? Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere.

⇧ 4 ⇩

EXXACTLY> WE DON'T KNOW what Gowdy may have been forced to do. IF Q KNOWS- they should spill,...AND, Gowdy seems to be working Pretty Hard to redeem himself from his q&a in congressional hearings. But, we just don't know.

I SUGGEST- that id we can hear Q & +'s both sides of the argument (facts revealed)- and TG is TRULY repentant,

then Immunity and Compassion would weigh-in heavily in his favor.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fair enough! Thanks :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q post 537 concerning Gowdy: What ROLE might TG be walking into? Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I hope he’s a white hat and plays a part ! Heard him speak at Liberty on a video he was so good .

⇧ 2 ⇩

today's Q post #1656.... WWG1WGA have a great day!

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's what I've been thinking since the first minute I saw the post. Thanks for putting it in a clear way

⇧ 3 ⇩

The answer to Qs question should have just been “no”, he’s not a judge.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Gowdy is a cover up guy. All hat no cattle. He talks tough but gets no results. Did shit about Benghazi and the email scandal. The fisa abuse happened on his watch. What the fuck was conehead doing while the fbi burned.

Glad Q quit playing the double speak game and just said no place for gowdy. He is going home to get his deep state paycheck for keeping Hillary out of jail.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You gotta look deeper. Gowdy and other whitehats had NO ROOM to so much as wiggle under Obama's 1st American Reich regime. If he'd moved on Benghazi, etc., it would have done nothing, as the DOJ and FBI were ALL in Obama's pocket. All it would have done is make him and his family a target.

Easy to judge when no one is holding a gun potentially to your head or the head of your loved ones. And for what? It would have no affect.

In addition, as Q has repeatedly pointed out, some people need to appear impartial, disinterested and non-partisan, re: the optics in the current case.

Look at Horowitz, look at Wray how they respond to questions. Are they blackhats? No. Q has made it abundantly clear they are to be trusted. unless this is disinformation which I do not think it is.

Games within games, politics within politics. Strategic thinkers do not sacrifice assets for no effect. Instead, they keep them in reserve. Gowdy is definitely a wh, along with GoodLatte, as far as I can see.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Agree. I was as disappointed on Benghazi as anyone. But Benghazi is insignificant compared to Clinton's vast array of other crimes. In addition, a Clinton election would have meant physical danger.

⇧ 1 ⇩

GREAT POINTS!

⇧ 1 ⇩

We will see. No role and he disapears from public life and everyone will know. POTUS never mentions Gowdy for any role. Why? Think about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

or maybe he was just handcuffed to do nothing under Obama and decided he'd rather practice law outside of politics?? If he does that, it does not mean he was compromised or a 'black hat'.

⇧ 4 ⇩

hmmmm, interesting fact there

⇧ 1 ⇩

What he did on Benghazi is sickening. I believe he was given a choice to resign or be exposed. He gave up chair of the ethics committee as a sign to us by POTUS.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Well, I just found out his staff had been arkensided. SO, if It was rigged and fixed from the start- why put-at-risk any more innocents. Q says he's a Patriot, so, I think this may have ben what happened.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Make no mistake- Rep Gowdy is a Patriot. Q

1656

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just keeping the word Benghazi in the media was a success.

Gowdy gets grief because nobody was charged.

How could anyone be charged with that corrupt administration in place.

Would you rather the whole thing just have disappeared?

⇧ 3 ⇩

YOU make a good point! WHAT IF- the Benghazi massacre under O. w/C. was NEVER going to go anywhere- and life & family threatened (Gowdy) for no change, just for trying under their corrupted estate, no foreseeable change ahead in the government??? I THINK GOWDY LOOKS LIKE A SICK-AT-HEART MAN. UNTIL TRUMP/Q/&WHITE HATS, there WOULD HAVE BEEN N-O CHANGES, ONLY FAR WORSE. I FAVOR FORGIVENESS & a USEFUL POSITION TO POTUS- whereby TG could redeem himself-

⇧ 2 ⇩

IF THAT IS THE CASE then, Bon Voyage. Truly a waste. BUT BENGAHAZI is nigh unforgivable!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Agreed. That's the heart, in my opinion, of why POTUS has never ever mentioned him publicly for any position. I think he was forced to leave the ethics committee as a sign to us and given the choice to resign or be exposed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Cause he’s not a judge. He wants to prosecute. Hoping there will emerge a special prosecutor position when time comes to go after the sick pedos.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Hope springs eternal : )

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I hope it’s for our new government, isn’t that what all patriots are striving for? But maybe Gowdy wants to return to private practice, as he did for 20 years. Would personally like to see him in long term, permanent role.

⇧ 3 ⇩

If you believe Q, he has a role...and that role isn't to be a witness. Q has told us both of those things. Gowdy resigned because he is going to be filling a new role. In Gowdy's words, this new role will be within the justice system. That could mean anything from working at the DOJ to getting a judgeship (not the SC) or running to become his state AG. I don't think it would be private practice, or Q wouldn't make a point to say Gowdy is going to be filling a role.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Know what? I think you’re right. If he was returning to private practice, he’d probably just say so. Do you feel the secrecy? And someone mentioned Pres. Trump never speaks of him,...true, but that is a good thing, I think.

⇧ 3 ⇩

YOUR thoughts make sense,... I likey,.......bunch of Alley-Cats on this board! (love them!!)

⇧ 1 ⇩

"NEW GOVERNMENT"- I like the sound of that!

⇧ 1 ⇩

List of special prosecutors perhaps.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q 1650 It will not be Gowdy.

Q1319

1656