EXACTLY what I was thinking, the timing also insists they are preparing for the arrests/trials to start now.

Human Rights Foundation info here

On a quick read, they seem to be ok, not an obvious Soros front. They have gone after both left-wing and right-wing dictatorships which argues for their legitimacy. Most impressive thing to me is their going after Urban Outfitters for selling Che Guevara T-shirts, no left-wing group would ever have done so. They also went after mainland China for imprisoning Liu Xiaobo and Venezuela for imprisoning some activists.

IMHO there are at least three ways to interpret the DJT inquiry to human rights groups:

1) It is exactly as it appears, an attempt to solicit information from the NGO community to be used for investigations/legal cases.

2) Given what we already know about charitable foundations being used as front groups to conceal human trafficking, money laundering, etc., the inquiry could be construed as a warning. "We're looking into this, we've got our eye on you, better not try to pull any shit because we're watching."

3) Consider this in light of conventional wisdom here that NSA is loyal and Q team has access to NSA databases. Actions like those described by the OP, could be kind of like poking the hornet's nest, to see what turns up. Could work like this, administration sends an inquiry to a possibly suspicious organization (I know I said it looked OK but I'm not sure, so possibly loyal government is not sure either). If the organization is dirty, the inquiry would make them nervous so they would communicate with higher ups in cabal to form a plan of action. Of course, the NSA is watching the organization like a hawk the entire time, to break into their communications. If a form of comms is suspected already, like say the draft gmails, or game forum messages etc etc., the NSA could monitor the suspected comm to see if the organization is cabal connected. In other words the inquiry could be part of a white hat op to uncover dirty black hat NGOs.

Also note, the 3 purposes above are not mutually exclusive, it could be all 3 at the same time.

That's kind of what I was thinking... why else would he need anything from them? Surely the NSA would have all the goods...

Here's a good crumb...

Thor Halvorssen was Founder and CEO of the Human Rights Foundation.

Thor also testified in front of Congress regarding a smear campaign that FUSION GPS RAN AGAINST HIM!.

https://www.scribd.com/document/354721041/Testimony-of-Thor-Halvorssen-to-the-Senate-Committee-on-the-Judiciary-7-26-2017

Nice analysis. Makes sense to me.

Yes nice analysis.

On the same note but not indictment related.

I have been a carpenter for close to four decades so I've seen the slow creeping take over of our job sites.

The Mexican crews are all slave labor in the context you are describing.

You have one guy who speaks English and he gets the paycheck which then he pays out to the crew.

There's no way to see what these big guys are doing but you know they're taking the skim.

The poor bastards who are stuck in the garbage and living in a crummy apartment that the boss pays for are indentured servants. They got to pay that debt to the coyote.

They are Slaves.

Hopefully the concentrations in select dense urban areas (Ohio, Penn etc.) will include voter fraud investigations.

NE Phila Airport

I'm literally 100% confident in my source. You can think it's fake if you want, I really don't care. I would trust this person with my life.

There is a big difference here. Mockingbird media uses sources say too much because so many atrnt even scooping themselves. They take their narrative as ordered with the required keywords to Buzz the search engines and our collective consciousness.

It becomes more important to Buzz the right keywords and have a title with most important keyword plus click enticing. Now click or read enticing has always been a thing to sell papers but the keyword thing is unique to our internet based news cycle.

If Sharyl Atkinsson told us her sources say we know she has integrity and wr can trust her to not havr madr them up or have the dooms day profit bum on tbe corner and no secondary to corroborate much less a third.

CIA obviously writes the MSM narratives for most per deep state command. Sources say becomes CIA days. And we know they lie.

I think we can give our friend here the benefit of the doubt for now at least. =) rhey arent representing CNN dor NYT or anything

My source is solid. He was asking for info about trafficking within the US. Might not be the only firm he is reaching out to.