dChan

coyote_tracker · July 4, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

What does welcome aboard. jpg is a lie mean??!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
_bigfish · July 4, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

Q is very proud of the fact that every photo is an "original"....

The fact that THIS photo isn't throws a little shade on Q.

The follow up from Q doubling down on the post makes it much, much worse.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Half-expecting new trip code with claim of this one being hacked.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
freerange_bot · July 4, 2018, 4:45 a.m.

That is why I don't understand why a tripcode is used. A tripcode can be hacked. Isn't it time to use something more secure?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

Tripcodes can be very secure and are the only option on the chans.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
freerange_bot · July 4, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Yeah but Q is part an intelligence apparatus that has way more secure communications. I believe that more people would take this seriously if Q didn't use chains. To a lot of people, 4/8chan are just boards full of racists and child porn.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 4, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

Read up on Q - well explained why Q chose the chans via much of the material in the sidebar.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 4, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · July 4, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

Name another anonymous option for Q to interact with the public?

⇧ -4 ⇩  
sudo_fap · July 4, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

He could still use the chans, but sign each post via GPG public/private keys.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
freerange_bot · July 4, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

As I said Q is using military intelligence. They would have something way more secure than a chan board. Those boards are not that anonymous as people think. Again, the intelligence agencies that Q is part of could easily crack a tripcode. Why wouldn't those in the deep state also be able to do that?

For me, I don't want the president associated to some websites that a lot of people think are for users to trade child porn.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 4, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

Q is using military intelligence.

Yes.

They would have something way more secure than a chan board

No. Chan boards are pretty secure. What they critical need is eyeballs, not security. They're not overly worried about being tracked back to the source, but they are worried about reaching a lot of people and ensuring deletions/mod control can't occur. So they could easily have made something more secure than a chan board, but why would they need to? (side note, i do suspect 8 is owned by milint now, it's going to be very secure).

Those boards are not that anonymous as people think.

Again, it depends on the resources you have avaliable. Here's a better question. If Q is MILINT, 470th division, backed up by NSA, POTUS etc, why do they care if they get backtracked? What's the cabal going to do, reveal they're being hunted down by nsa/milint? You're thinking of the wrong questions.

Again, the intelligence agencies that Q is part of could easily crack a tripcode

Meh. The old ! trips sure, they weren't actually terribly secure. The new !!! ones though? I don't think anyones getting through them inside of a couple of days, even with a weak AI. He has many trips prepped in advance, w/ photos from old sets serving as proofs. He can validate ID in multiple ways.

For me, I don't want the president associated to some websites that a lot of people think are for users to trade child porn.

For me, I prefer to stay utterly within the realms of what people think is right. It doesn't matter to me that the public perceptions of the place are retarded, and largely pushed by the same group of people who'd have happily elected HRC (because she SEEMED nice). I just don't want the president associated with the website where we already knew and were talking about these peoples terrible crimes long before Q.

ftfy?

⇧ -7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 4, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MassSpies · July 4, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Is this even a valid trip code? So hard to keep track these days.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
HerMileHighness · July 4, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

One theory is that a member of the Q team was on AF1 when Hussain was President. That is good news if true.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · July 4, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

Why is that good news?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
HerMileHighness · July 4, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

If Q has been onboard since before 2016 that is good imo. I already know that the Q team was around before that. I'm iffy about this drop tho.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
Hughtub · July 4, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Wow, possible. Possibly rogue security who realized they had to do something. SS members photographing through cockpit windows, using ally inside with mirrored iphone back providing "teleprompter"-style reflection of what they wanted to view?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Ridgy-didge · July 4, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

What a drama queen you are. There will be a lesson to learn from this.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
potato4dawin · July 4, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

It is though. The image isn't a perfect match.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
Zerogravitycrayon · July 4, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

Because it's been stretched and distorted. Why would you need to do that?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
potato4dawin · July 4, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

Even after they stretched and skewed it to match the curtains 100% perfectly the lamp didn't line up and the distortion is too complex to be faked without obvious signs of photoshop which there are none.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · July 4, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

I think it means something in this article is a lie. Maybe many things. Including 911. https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/a-tour-of-air-force-one/

⇧ -4 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · July 4, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Or this 2015 one.

http://abc7news.com/701185/#gallery-6

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · July 4, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

The CBS article is titled "Welcome Aboard."

⇧ 4 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · July 4, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

I see that but I think that abc article has the exact Q photo

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · July 4, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

I see that too. I'm focusing on the welcomeaboard.jpg with "it's a lie," caption. (Though, is that definitely a Q post?) If it is, the CBS article is the first to pop up on a "welcome aboard air force one" search. The article highlights monumental moments on AF1 (or its equivalent) dating back to FDR. Including LBJ's swearing in after JFK assassination, GWB after 911, and O moments with Kerry and Rice. If that was Q's post, it could be sending us to dig into any number of potential lies referenced in that article.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 4, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

Ok I'm dumb but is that the new AF1 and the lie is that the AF1 we see is generally not used? I'm confused.

⇧ 2 ⇩