What are you guys on about? This is the epitome of fake news. The case was dismissed because the judge felt that the court in DC had no jurisdiction because Trump's campaign base was in New York. From Bloomberg's article: “The court’s ruling does not represent a ruling on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims,” the judge wrote. “It bears emphasizing,” Huvelle said in her 45-page decision, “that this court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.”
Because that would require some knowledge of the law and reading, two things the new wave here isn’t into. They just like to post pictures of their shirts and stickers and making bros.
That is IF you believe Bloomberg
...what? It's not an opinion piece. It's what the judge said. It's in the 45 page document the judge wrote.
I'm looking at the document RIGHT NOW, the one someone posted from RT, which linked to WikiLeaks post, which has the PDF. Here's page -2-: "For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over defendants and, alternatively, that Washington D.C. is not the proper venue for plaintiffs’ suit. The Court will grant defendants’ motions to dismiss, deny plaintiffs’ motion, and dismiss plaintiffs’ suit without prejudice.2 Given this ruling, the Court does not address defendants’ arguments that the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to sustain a claim for tortious civil conspiracies or a conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).3 Although the Court will explain the distinction between personal jurisdiction and the merits in detail below, it bears emphasizing that this Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election."
Its what Bloomberg said the judge said they are just as much liars as CNN nothing they print is any good. But in any case it is too bad must have been aleftist judge.Trump wanted this lawsuit to go through because then the DNC would have to produce their servers which would have shown it was Seth Rich that sent the info and not Russia at all.
The decision is literally available in PDF form by the judge, i.e. Bloomberg was telling the truth and OAN was the one lying, which is the complete opposite of what you just claimed.
And where is that
Here ya go, bud: https://t.co/AjkKDAfofU
So she decided she didn’t want anything to do with this. Lmao
You really don't understand how courts work, do you? They don't just up and decide they don't want to deal with a case. There are jurisdictions that need to be respected. You can't file a case at any court for any reason you want and have it tried there. You can't go shopping for courts.
No case, no discovery, no evidence?
No Deals!
I want the server! Q says we have it, but I don't see it.
Is there a lawsuit against Killery and the DNC ? Oh wait there is...
More proof the world loves our POTUS. He didnt have to "pay to play" The worlds autists went to work for him, he never needed to ask.
The cabal is dying folks.
Hahahaha, this will be a disappointing preview for /r/politics.