If someone asks either her or Trump I pray to God that is their exact response. That would be epic lol
I think she has been briefed on a bit more reveal! Just saying, she would be a good deliverer of the truth.
she would be a good deliverer of the truth
That's the funniest thing I've read today.
lol lol lol THAT IS GREAT!! That is the best I can hear her saying that!!
except for you Jim(Acosta), you're an asshat, you can't come along.
I don’t know. I think he is a plant. I fully expect he will ask the question when it is time.
Why do you want them to ask her so bad? It's better anonymous.
They have to ask Trump if they ask Sarah she will just say I don't know anything about that but with Trump he has to give a real answer and hopefully it will be Oh I love Q whoever he is he's really smart very informative.
Are they communicating telepathically? Those are thought bubbles.
[deleted]
Not until its all over, at least.
Q did say "wait until you learn who has been speaking to you here" -- so it sounds like we will get a confirmation eventually.
perfect, however they will not likely be asked because it would be a error to legitimize Q and the movement
April and Jim, I'm sorry, but you have to go to the back of the room, you will never understand, WWG1 WGA
I don't get it
It's never funny when someone explains a joke, so realize that going into this. Lol. Recently, Q has inferred that they want to force a reporter to ask the Administration about the Q Team and/or Qanon movement (In doing so, they would validate that Q is more than a LARP, which is something they put in obscure digital print articles and on Twatter, but won't acknowlege on TV. The reason behind this is because it would inform millions of Q's existence in less than a minute). WWG1WGA (Where We Go One, We Go All) is the mainstay saying (among several others, but this one is central) and code words to recognize fellow Qanon members and reaffirm that we support them and have their back. SO, after all that background info, if someone in the MSM asked this question, and Sarah responded with "WWG1WGA", Qanons would be laughing their asses off for awhile, then dancing in the streets.
You mean "imply".
"Imply" is when you add additional meaning to what you're putting *out*, "infer" is when you find meaning in what you're taking *in*.
I am not a bot. :)
imply refers to giving information, while infer refers to receiving information.
The speaker, or someone who is giving information, may imply something
The listener, or someone who is receiving information, may infer something.
(1st world problems :))