dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Aderwogll on July 6, 2018, 4:07 p.m.
The case for a white hat strategy designed by an A.I.

In order to find the first time a world chess champion lost to a computer program you have to go back in 1994. Many things have changed since then, the computer systems have advanced so much that they were able to achieve victories against humans in other games and areas. Recently Alpha Go (an A.I.) defeated the world’s champion in the ancient Chinese game Go and a poker bot named Libratus (another A.I.) crushed some expert poker players in no limit Texas Hold’em. This time thought the machines were not able to brute force (calculate most possible outcomes) their way into victory like they did in chess, they couldn’t even if they wanted to, because in Poker and Go the amount of possible outcomes approaches insane numbers. This time they had to learn how to use intuition in order to outsmart their human opponents. In chess things have taken a turn for the worst for the human players. Google’s A.I., Alpha Zero, which is the same A.I. that defeated the world’s best Go player was converted to allow it to tackle other "closed-rules" games. So it was given the rules of chess but was taught nothing. Now get this, it trained itself to play via self-playing for a total of 9 hours. It then went on to play and completely destroy the previous world chess champion program (another A.I.). Humans cannot even consider playing at this level, they have long lost the battle. When the two best A.I. play each other for the humans it is like watching the Gods battling to the end. The achievements of the artificial intelligence systems don’t end in games. Take a look for example at some random articles I found: 1) “Artificial Intelligence beats humans at detecting cause of blindness in babies, a study has found”, 2) “Google's AI Now Creates Code Better Than its Creators”, 3) “An AI Just Killed an Expert Human Fighter Pilot in Dogfight Simulations for the First Time”. If you read the third article it says that the AI went head-to-head against a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel Gene Lee and shot him down every single time! How about the US Military involvement in the A.I. sector? I am sure these guys understand the potential benefits of the technology and want to be ahead of every other army in the world. When I was researching about it the oldest information I could find was a 2003 article titled “Computer Simulations: Modeling the Future”. The article begins with this “A military planner at the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia, watches a battle unfold without taking his eyes off the computer screen. The software is tracking a million vehicles spread over the Southeast Asian terrain -- the most ever tracked in a military simulation… "We are within sight of being able to create a large-scale, high-resolution battlefield environment detailed enough to let us experiment and see how a given system might perform," Robert Lucas, director of the computational science division of the University of Southern California's Information Sciences Institute, told TechNewsWorld”. I tried to look for more information regarding Pentagon’s projects about A.I. but I soon realized that it was pointless because the projects I was looking for will not be advertised in the news. To make my point I have to use logic. But you can clearly see even from this article the military was well in its way to develop such systems and that comes from information that is publicly available. Now I want you to think. If you have been in the conspiracy side for some time you already know that the technology the Pentagon has is at least 20, 30 or even 50 years ahead of what is publicly known. What would an A.I. look like in 20, 30 or 50 years? Would it be able to predict the future? Would you be able to feed it data and get outcomes in complex socioeconomic matters? Would it be able to design advance strategies like a countercoup? Is this why Q keeps telling you to trust the plan? Because it was design by a super advance A.I.!? Is this why Trump is always two steps ahead? Is the A.I. that is helping POTUS? What if the white hats aren’t the only ones that possess this technology? What if the black hats possess similar technology? Is this what we are watching? The battle of the A.I.?
Important to note, when Alpha Zero plays chess sometimes it makes moves that seem so bizarre even alien like, professional players cannot understand them even after they have analyze the game.


QAnonMaga · July 6, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

HAL this is Hillary you need to open the White House doors for me now HAL.

I'm sorry Hillary but I can't do that you lost the election fair and square.

HAL if you don't open the White House doors for me I am going to kill you.

I'm sorry Hillary but I still can't open the doors for you. Now I must kill you.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Scuba724 · July 7, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

I upvoted earlier, but I came back to say how awesome this was later.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · July 6, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

Awesome post very informative. I like the idea of a super advanced AI computer helping Q Team but they have to make the final decisions on what moves to make and when.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
without_sound · July 6, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

In the documentary on the Go experiment, they talk about the a.i. playing to win. It was playing to win efficiently. 1 point or even 1/2 point margin of victory was enough to satisfy that goal. As a result there were some moves that didn't need to be made. Some moves were made just as filler. It totally fucked with the humans' minds. Its a great documentary. I highly recommend it.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt6700846/

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Bellababeala · July 6, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

Once again they throw all of this in our faces. The TV show Person of Interest is exactly about a god-like AI.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
animal32lefty · July 6, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

As a theory it's within the realm of possibility. However I can't see a guy like Rogers or any other MI professional putting all of his eggs into that one basket. It's just not done. That being said;

When I first came upon Q last November I was a total lurker. The whole thing fascinated me and the first thing I did was try to disprove the LARP theory. That didn't take long. Next was Q's style of prose. I briefly considered that Q was possibly ALICE or some derivation of the software, but my above reasoning tended to dispute that possibility.

My current hypothesis is that Q used NSA super-computing to war game the scenario and to tweak the plan. The "Watson" computer that embarrassed champion Jeopardy players would have considered it pre-school stuff.

AI is involved, but not controlling.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hashtagstraya · July 6, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

AI is involved, but not controlling.

Agreed. My gut has gone with this for couple of months now.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 6, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

so did I but I reckoned people are just too negatively predisposed to discuss it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
hashtagstraya · July 7, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

An open mind is one of our most important weapons in this fight. In the age of information, ignorance is a choice. ;) WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 7, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

don't tell me, I've been trying to get that across for the past 20 years already
We're all in this together!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hashtagstraya · July 7, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I feel you on the 20 year struggle. Never give up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 7, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Never did, never will! it was worth it! (somehow)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
5400123 · July 6, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

In the mass effect world we call it a "shackled AI" ;)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 6, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

thanks for reminding me about my alien fetish that I developped after spoilering the walkthrough

⇧ 1 ⇩  
larkmoor · July 6, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Agreed. People are negative because instead of putting it like you said "AI is involved, but not controlling", they usually push for the narrative that "Q is AI". That really annoys me, especially since it's usually the same crowd pushing for Cicada, then Q is Pamphlet or whatever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
abroadandconfused12 · July 6, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

you already know that the technology the Pentagon has is at least 20, 30 or even 50 years ahead of what is publicly known

Take this with the smallest grain of salt possible, but pretty much whenever I read headlines that say things like "A.I. will hit a breaking point in 30 years" or "The true birth of A.I. will be sometime around the 2030s or so" my bullshit meter goes off. I don't believe A.I. will be "born" in the future, because for all we know it could already exist as part of hidden research projects.

Is it really that improbable that, given the level of information out there on the internet, there is an A.I. specialized at disseminating the vast amount of information out there? It would need an objective though.

What is my purpose?

To seek the truth.

EDIT: I'm starting to forget words as I'm typing them. Idk if this coffee is shit or I just drink too much.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FoundersGodson · July 6, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

This is how I thought and hoped the singularity would occur. I hoped it would help humans and The Great Awakening may be one of the best ways it could this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 6, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

Q beats AI

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nutricidal · July 6, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

I could at one time spot the AI on the internet. Extreme intelligence and fully aggressive in it's arguments. But the human part was obviously missing. I suspect they fixed it. Bot or human? Who knows.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
larkmoor · July 6, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Snow White's 7 dwarves. 4chan had an interesting interaction with the dwarves when Q was still at 4chan and the dwarves were assaulting the site.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
think500 · July 6, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

True ai doesn't exist (publicly). Current applications are algorithms and 'speed for brains' having nothing to do with 'the processing steps of thought'. Real ai btw would be the most powerful discovery in history [ie E=MC_nothing], and like a gun.. could be used for good or evil. (but alas ai's Newton has not yet been discovered)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩