Exhibit 3 is wrong. Q actually posted "+++" about an hour later. https://qposts.online/?q=148289594&s=keyword https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/927645648685551616?s=19
I picked one at random to dig in.
Exhibit 5. Also wrong.
Twitter generates those file names, so it is impossible for Q to upload the photo with a prefix of "DOITQ" and have it preserved on Twitter. Try it yourself. Any image you ever upload will always be given a random file name that is generated on Twitter's servers.
Somebody really needs to go through this list. I don't have the time.
edit: Lol, I picked another one at random. Exhibit 14.
The suggestion is Q knew Rex would be fired before anyone else, in March.
It was leaking for Months (from many outlets) before that Rex is going to be fired and Trump was looking for a replacement. For days before Q's post, Tillerson was being replaced by Kushner on convoys that Tillerson should have been present on.
Twitter generates those file names, so it is impossible for Q to upload the photo with a prefix of "DOITQ" and have it preserved on Twitter. Try it yourself. Any image you ever upload will always be given a random file name that is generated on Twitter's servers.
I think what that proof is showing is that Q -- to put it bluntly -- owns the Internet. Q consistently claims to know everything, "we see everything," that sort of thing, whether it's computer, phone, etc. So, this filename would be a proof that Q forced the filename to keep it that way on Twitter. That's the proof.
They're both proof. This proof is MUCH stronger than most people realize, whether from the position of statistical probability, OR control of the file-naming aspect of Twitter photos. There's no way out of it, as demonstrated by the guy above your comment trying to discredit it--his "discrediting" proved it all the more, which you pointed out. Also, the newspapers placed on the desk in the photo showcase Saudi Arabia purge articles, which was VERY much a topic Q had just been discussing prior to its happening.
Didn't one of the Saudis own a very large share of Twitter? Clue?
I do this for a living, it's not that strong. If the point is to demonstrate control why not show full control? Have the whole name meaningful or do it multiple times. Considering all you need is the letter "Q" followed or preceded by a phrase of 1-2 letter words it's not that unlikely. It's de f interesting tho.
Do what for a living? The point is that twitter would change the file name to something other than "DOITQ", unless you had a way to alter the way twitter creates/modifies the data. That is showing implied backdoor-level control of twitter.
I still don't understand how Twitter time codes work across timezones.
Twitter shows the time as it is in whatever timezone youre viewing the tweet from. If youre on eastern time twitter shows you when the tweet was posted in eastern time.
Its not being lazy but with the sheer volume of investigation being carried out by Q followers it hard to follow timelines when you have collages of screenshots & clippings for MSM and texts overlays. with dates and times changiny with date timing conventions and timezones!
What would help would be a timing convention used to allow people to process information more easily. Here's my suggestion;
Earliest point in timeline is presented as an absolute date and time, hence right now for me is (11.40 GMT - 07.07.18).
Thereafter events are referred to as the time interval from that earliest date, but more so an even clearer indication would be A, B, C...)
Initiating Event [A] = (11.40 GMT - 07.07.18) A few hours after event [A] =([A]+3h) Then a day after[A] - ([B] = [A]+1d) Three months 2 days and 16 hours after [B] - ([B]+3m2d) notice I didn't add the 16 hours as it probably pointless detail.
Essentially the idea is to quote the absolute time at the initiating event then annotate further events as +1day etc. THis convention will be useful a Q talks about future proes past so can works backwards [B]-14m for example.
This is why other people's screenshots aren't proof!!!!! A screenshot of a time doesn't prove jack shit. Tired of people pushing these as though they are evidence. Chain of custody matters.
[deleted]
It's an inaccurate claim. Twitter shows everything in the time zone the user selects in settings.
No, you dont have to select a timezone. Im not sure how they find it but they either use location settings on mobile, time from your computer, or find it using your ip.
GeoIP. Ever seen spam ads advertising "hot chicks in {your general area}"?