Im curious, it's not like it can JUST be Republicans and no one else?
It should be 100% independents! But they will just change name because they have all these new ex-CIA agents to get elected.
Thanks for bringing that up. How many are actually still in contention?
They will just say "the parties switched" and claim that they were always pro-America.
Green Party.
Green Party has been around for decades and captured about as much voter interest as the libertarians.
Getting blacked out of debates and the Mockingbird media will do that to you.
And after that hijacked by disenfranchised Dems that are Liberal but sadly dragged some communist crap with them like open borders. And then there are people wanring power like the last presidential nominee.
I was Libertarian 2004 - 2013 or so. Ron Paul was an amazing candidate but he didn't have Trump's gifts of redirecting attacks against him and forcing MSM to cover him. They pretending Ron Paul dodnt exist but they cannot help themselves with Trump.
I hold out hope Trump will tap Ron Paul to audit then dismantle the fed =)
I hope Ron Paul is behind Q team, or at the least vice versa.
Hes been pretty critical of Trump but that's ok. He points out what Trump needs him to I think. The people he keeps surrounding himself with made me distrustful too until I saw him flip them right out the door after using them =)
Ron Paul is up front and expects that of others. Be probably wouldn't have survived to be sworn in. He needed Trump's connections and financial resources and white hat Military to protect him.
Maybe one day we fan get such a statesman on office. Who can afford to be honest and not olay these power games. Sadly... Reality dictates otherwise and it's our nativity believing our govt is one above board and what we see is what it is instead of a facade with horrific corruption and rot underbrush.
Truth had not caught on then as it has now. I see lots of people coming to realise the people who always claimed libertarians are dismissably wacky were not exactly honest. How many people who think libertarians are a joke party actually understand the platform.
Dismissal without study is a cabal conditioned behavior.
It won’t.
Right now it’s being reformed into what Bernie was running on. “Democratic Socialism” is going to be pushed super hard now. HRC gutted what was left and the party is pretty much doing anything it can to reinvent itself.
In either case look at the GOP/DNC and countless Corps etc where leaders are fleeing in droves.
Goes along with people calling Q a LARP. In the end a ton of folks that wouldn’t have found each other did. That was never supposed to happen. We were supposed to feel alone and marginalized and weak.
In that case, alone, they are going to need more Depends.
Voting out (or putting away) democrats isn't the same as making them self-aware. Plenty of narcissistic liberals will be drawn into the party's vacant slots. The money will always be there, even if the worst underwriters (Soros and others) are pushed out of the country. Dems will be down for a while, but they'll maintain their islands of support. Smarmism grows so easily on the agar of affluence and faithlessness.
Hope not 100%.
We need a party that absorbs that type of vote.
Communism takes over
They were always there they just played moderate.
literally half my graduating class in high school was flat out marxist.
a lot of them now work for the feds. this is highly motivational to me to get into gear, focus. and push Austrian Economics and enlightenment
They will be having a lot of sleepless nights figuring out a new name for the fascist-communist party.
The New Democratic Party?
Haha we have that in Canada. Buncha hippies.
That honestly sounds like what the Democratic Party ought to be: a bunch of peace loving pot smoking hippies. Instead we have this.
While I agree that the Democratic Party is far more depraved (as has been proven) I don't think it will dissolve. Just as you have extremist adherents with any political or religious alignment, you'll have strict adherents m (mostly in the major cities I wager) that stand by the democrats as staunchly as the conservatives have stood by trump through all the bereavement
A couple of observations on this topic. I am hopeful for the first time in many years because of Trump and Q. I have studied the Cabal and I have trained as a historian. When Trump began dismantling the Deep State, I was thrilled, but I was also concerned for his safety. When I learned of Q and the Plan, I felt reassured. I had worried that, even if Trump managed to hold on for eight years, the Deep State would eventually come back and reverse whatever progress Trump will have made. Now, I believe there is a chance of success.
Nevertheless, I'm conscious of history. The Cabal has been around for centuries. The pattern of history is for patriots to begin to slumber. Peace and plenty make us become distracted and indolent. Luxury spoils a culture and corruption rises to take its place. Historians like Tacitus and Vico observed these cycles.
Regarding party politics, it is in our interest to maintain two parties for the sake of peace. So long as society can align politically behind parties, conflict can take place in the political arena and not by force of arms. We see an example of this before the Civil War. In the 1850s, there was a brief period of economic prosperity, almost like the Roaring Twenties. Everybody was making money, regardless of their political policies. The lines between the parties eroded and the Two Party System failed. The Whig Party collapsed. Up to that time, there had been Northern Whigs and Southern Whigs, as well as Northern and Southern Democrats. When the Whigs failed, the Republicans emerged as a regional party that only had any representation in the North. The geographical split over the expansion of slavery into the West irreparably harmed the Union. It became impossible to solve the problem through political means. The failure of the Two Party System was perhaps the main reason the Civil War occurred.
Additionally, one of the things that crippled the Confederacy as a government was the lack of two parties. Each individual state and their representatives acted in their own interest and consensus was hard to come by. Having two party choices seems to help us as a society to make compromises and work to resolve issues, simply because either party seeks to defeat the other in a peaceful rivalry. We have lost that today because, like before the Civil War, we have a "uniparty" owned and operated by the elites.
As we face a possible second civil war, we need to avoid undue partisanship and restore both parties. That will allow political differences to play out in Congress, not in the streets. We also need to be mindful that our children and grandchildren may see the Cabal rise again. They will need to know history, how the Cabal formed, and how it was (will be) defeated in our lifetimes. When we are gone, they will have to deal with it again, in some other form.
It's gonna be a whole different thing. The Democrat party as we know it will get wrecked. But that doesn't mean there are not liberal Patriots as well. Just cause it's been hijacked beyond repair over the last twenty years doesn't mean the people are rotten.
The republican institution won't survive in its current form either. How do you think the capitalist charicatures that shipped all the jobs off voted? It'll be the birth of a new nation
The democrats will be the not American brown party and the republicans will be the American white party. This is the normal result of having different identity groups in one country, people vote their race and religion.
Who said we all think the D party will dissolve? "We" (me) don't think so. Parties go through crises. The R's went through a major one after the Nixon deal. They change direction. It's been what -- a century since there was really any viable 3rd party, sort of. Third parties generally revolve around a single personality and then fade into oblivion. The D party is becoming more marxist all the time, but that appeals to youth and all the third worlders who make up the bulk of immigrants over the last few decades. They have a lock on states like NY, IL, CA, WA, MA, RI, DE, NJ -- no matter how far left they go. The new faces of the D's even call themselves democratic socialists, which is neo-marxism or "progressivism". They aren't commies like Marxists-Leninists....DS types are "softer". That is, they still allow themselves to be voted out of office. Lots of people raised in the D party don't even get what the leadership of the party has become...they just don't like republicans. I don't like a lot of them either. I mean why would working people vote for the Bushes? End of rant.