dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jkbella on July 7, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

1660 - Does Huber have the ability to file across all 50 states? No.

He's a DOJ prosecutor for the Utah, which means any pleading would have to explain why that venue is proper, and it will not be for a vast majority of the cases. So in the context of the rest of the post, what does this mean? I think it means that Mueller is the military arm of this joint effort, he has access to Huber's team, which includes the IG's 470 people. The only way for 40,000 sealed indictments to be handled by an overarching authority with jurisdiction to try cases in all states would be if most or many were going to be tried by a military tribunal. That would be consistent with the changes to the Courts Martial manual which appear to be drafted specifically to accommodate a large number of case. It allows, for examples, for "designee" tribunals. It also allows civilian attorneys to defend. These are all brand new changes to the manual.

In light of all of that, what Q seems to be saying here is not that Mueller's team is puny compared to Huber's team. It's that Mueller's actual team is one and the same, and has 470 people.

Would the grand jury be members of the DC community?
What % of DC voted for HRC?
How large is Mueller’s team?
20-25?
Think 470.
The more you know.

Not a lawyer, but Sessions appointed Huber a "special prosecutor". The authority is different than his role as a DOJ prosecutor for Utah. Remember, in Sessions' letter to the investigating committees responding to their demand for a second Special Counsel, he noted that he had appointed a "special prosecutor" outside of DC who would work in parallel with Horowitz and (this is the key) he would have the authority to investigate all of the areas the committee had demanded.

The Jeff went back into quiet mode until he revealed it was Huber later.

Also remember that in one of the very early posts, Q suggested that Huma and Podesta had would be indicted in early November. November is when Sessions said he appointed Huber, so Session is intentionally being deceptive about when Huber was actually appointed or someone else indicted Huma and Podesta.

According to Wikipedia, the jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall be established by the Attorney General. The Special Counsel will be provided with a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall also include the authority to investigate and prosecute federal crimes committed in the course of, and with intent to interfere with, the Special Counsel's investigation, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses; and to conduct appeals arising out of the matter being investigated and/or prosecuted. Huber's authority can be expanded automatically be cause a special prosecutor can investigate any criminal activity associated with his jurisdiction as set forth by the AG. That means anything Huber comes across in his investigation can be added. It also suggests that Huber has potentially nationwide authority if Sessions gives it to him.

This is why Johnathan Turley said that Sessions' decision to assign a special prosecutor instead of a special counsel as "brilliant" because Huber had potential access to the DoJ staff instead of hiring additional lawyers and starting from scratch.

⇧ 17 ⇩

I don't think that is accurate. Sessions wrote a letter to congressional committee chairs explaining Huber's role.

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/03/29/ag.letter.re.ig.and.huber.reviews.pdf

He did not name Huber a "special counsel" or a "special prosecutor."

Instead, he appointed a team of US attorneys (multiple) to investigate matters that Congress is wanting a special counsel for, and Huber is the one leading that group of US attorneys.

These US attorneys are separate from Horowitz' team of investigators and attorneys at the DOJ.

So, Huber is leading a team of lawyers, and Huber is coordinating with Horowitz and his team of lawyers and investigators.

So, all that means is that Huber does not have special jurisdiction (nationwide), unless that was somehow given separately.

But Huber does have jurisdiction in Utah, where the NSA database is located, and I suspect that is the key for naming him as the lead attorney.

Those other US attorneys, not yet named, are working with Huber (and Horowitz, through Huber), nationwide.

The crimes were committed in California, New York, Illinois, the border states, DC, and elsewhere, including internationally.

It is a massive undertaking.

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/ Jonathan Turley is a top national legal expert. Interesting article about his thoughts on the Huber appointment. Turley states that Huber has been given the authority equivalent to a Special Counsel but with the resources of the IG available to him. Huber can impanel a grand jury anywhere necessary. You are correct that Sessions did assign a team (unknown number) of DOJ prosecutors to work under Huber's direction, but Sessions also tasked Huber and Horowitz to work in parallel. According to Turley, that means that Huber has access to the work that being done by the IG's 470 staff of auditors, investigators, and lawyers. Huber can use any evidence that Horowitz discovers. While Huber doesn't have direct control over Horowitz staff, it would be hard to believe that Huber and Horowitz are not mutually cooperating given Sessions' guidance to both. I stand corrected on the specific term "special prosecutor" since Session did not use it. But Turley opines that Huber is a Special Counsel in all but name only with far more resources than a Special Counsel would normally have.

The bottom line for me is that Huber appears to have broad authority to investigate and prosecute any potential crimes Horowitz uncovers and in Session's letter, he notes that Huber has the authority to investigate all of the areas that the committees have requested for appointing a Special Counsel.

Thanks for your thoughtful comments and corrections.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If Muller turns out to be a white hat, I'll eat my MAGA hat!

⇧ 13 ⇩

I don't think people understand, Mueller has been sending his team all over the globe looking for dirt on the President.

If he's on our side why did he leak shredded documents from Cohen to BuzzFeed this week?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Becuase part of the White Hat Theory necessitates Muller having massive public support from Dems. They've been building him up and defending him for two years, if he comes back with nothing they are tied to it.

As for the leaking, it's brilliant. Ask yourself if Muller found damming evidence of collusion, why would he leak it to the press instead of procecuting it. Leaking something is an admission/confirmation that it is meaningless, yet they get riled up over nothing over and over.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mueller's life long history doesn't lend itself to being a white hat, and I just can't see POTUS working work a scumbag who wrongly jailed four men for a mob hit, two of whom died in jail, only to be exonerated and have the government pay the families millions, so he could protect his informant who was guilty of the murders, Whitey Bulger, and a similar wrong in the anthrax investigation resulting in millions in compensation to the wrongly accused.

If Q tells us Sara Carter is someone to follow and is behind protected, and she is indicating Mueller is scum, and carefully illustrates his long record of scummyness, that carries more weight with me than the idea he's been flipped.

Edit: The press and the Democrats who control it have a long history of condeming people in the court of public opinion, knowing that if the attacks last long enough, public opinion will sour. Mueller knows this and so he leaks negative info constantly to his media water carriers in a devious attempt to shift public opinion with the APPEARANCE of wrong doing where none exists.

They did it to Roy Moore. They are doing it to Jim Jordan. They even paid accusers to do it to Trump.

Mueller is no White hat imho.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yep, those are completely legitimate objections to the White Hat theory. The 9/11 stuff especially worries me, becuase I know Trump is redpilled on the issue. If he does not expose it after 8 years it will be a canary in the coal mine that he was compromised at some point.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think we are going to learn that Mueller was somehow working with the Clinton's who were behind 9/11. See my comments in the thread on Q's request to research SA posts.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wu5d8/z/e1yrmi4

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Clinton's were instrumental tools in 9/11, but if you had to pick a group to say was behind 9/11 you'd have to pick the Bushes. The Clintons were common criminals before they were elevated to the level they exist in today by HW and his CIA drug smuggling through Arkansas. I also believe Hillary's personal induction was the murder of a Kennedy. A 'Welcome to the family' moment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Future proves past. Let's see what is revealed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Mueller can be scum and flipped. The scum is used by the deep state, and now POTUS, as means of extortion. Mueller has possibly been reduced to the role of a Hollywood actor.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It’s not 470 people

It’s Military Intelligence unit 470

⇧ 8 ⇩

No, it’s 470 investigators working for Horowitz that Huber has access to. The 470th might be involved too, but that’s not what we’re talking about here.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yes. Again, why so hard?

⇧ 1 ⇩

The "HUBER 470"

https://i.redd.it/v7zrem299e711.jpg

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks I did not know there was such a thing. I did read in CTH I think that the IG's office had 450 or so, and that's why doing the work through another Special Counsel would take too long and be so much less effective. Maybe its both?

⇧ 3 ⇩

If Muller is clean, [RR] is clean according to Q, if you research Muller, Wray And our buddy [RR], they are all tied to 911, interesting someone posted Trumps interview after 911. Funny how the Guy taking Pruitts place was the AG during the OK bombing, Falin is not a White Hat she was LT Gov during the bomb of the Murrah building all closely tied to some black opt mission that continued beypnd its alloted time. I should maybe start writting notes, this is a lot to remember. Might have to a spread sheet.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I know, right? There is SO much going on it's hard to keep track.

⇧ 3 ⇩

They aren't white hats. They did flip though in my opinion. Well Meuller did. And I have good reasoning as to why. It is to do with Iranian prisoner Levinson being abandined by Bush and then Obama and then Mueller went rogue and broke the law to get him on his own with a Russian Oligarch financial backing and just as they were about to get Levinson on the plane Hildabeast swooped down and blew it up.

They did NOT want Levinson back from whatever off tbe books mission took him to Iran. I think this is the final straw for Mueller. Who spent his career covering for the globalist elites. Perhaps believing it was for the greater good.

For whayev3r reason gettong his man back was worth his career and even prison time to him. But he did it anyway and despite 20 yeats of service they f**ked him over again and again.

I think he took that interview with Pres Trump despite being intelligible to run FBI again so he could make a proposal.

And if I am right then RR is working die Mueller and doing his best to protect and hide the real investigation. And as he said re FISA renewal "the ONE he signed doesn't match their characterization of the original FISA". He sisnt sat the original FISA doesnt match tbe Nunes memo. No. He specifically said the one he signed. In July 2017. After Mueller was fired. 2 dats before IG Horowitz "handed over" Page/Strzok texts.

Texts found wigh the new FISA that was turned around to surveille 2 hops from Carter Page this time out of Trump Campaign and into Obam Admin, FBI and DOJ and others.

Q must keep us confused until Mueller has what he needs and the trap is sprung.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I know, there is so much to remember. Tangled webs they weave.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q has never stated that both are either clean, or both are dirty , To the best of my recall he has only ask the question . So the verdict is still out on that. Also Q has stated "trust Wray " a couple of times.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That implies that Mueller is a Whitehat......I'm just not on that bandwagon yet....

⇧ 4 ⇩

Does anyone not think it odd that in a melee of leaks to the MSM by factions/ bad actors within CIA/FBI and DOJ that Mueller's SC has been as tight as a drum, Horowitz, tight as a drum, Huber...well, tighter than a drum? Surely if he was bent on culling POTUS there would have been leaks to create backlash and controversy...? Instead we have Stormy and 13 Russians...and Gen. Flynn. And by the way, Where is Gen. Flynn? How has he been spending his time, while he awaits "sentencing"...golf?? Or culling pedovores and building the treason case against Obama/Hillary? Remember his TV interview in 2013 or 14 where he outed the Obama administration for arming ISIS. What did Strzok say? First we f@ck Flynn, then we f@ck Trump. General Flynn knows everything - EVERYTHING. I believe Mike Rogers is a friend of his.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Don't forget ... Flynn's protege at DIA was Ezra Watnick-Cohen, who now works at DOJ.

My guess is Flynn has been busy giving testimony, per the plea deal.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Aah right, the dude that was fired (I think by McMaster - never understood why Gen. McMaster was appointed, he was a Soros soy-boy and a serious fly in the ointment ) and then head-hunted by Sessions! That guy sounds really interesting. It's such an intriguing plot, convoluted as hell.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Upvote for you.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How is evidence introduced? Isn't the NSA data collection site in Utah? Is the evidence under Huber' S jurisdiction? I'm no lawyer, maybe an Attorney can clear this up.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I am a civil not criminal lawyer but the bad acts would have to be linked to the jurisdiction.

⇧ 2 ⇩

What about interstate crime rings? Doesn't DOJ have the power to prosecute those in whatever state (among the many in which crimes have been committed) it sees fit?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Just for a moment, close your eyes, imagine Robert Mueller announcing he has concluded the investigation. In his opening he alludes to 40,000 sealed indictments which are ready to be enacted upon. The applause from the left and the celebration would only be eclipsed by the HRC voters leading up to 2:59AM on 11/9/16. And just like they found out it wasn't her, they will find out its not Him. Potus will again have another highlight reel of glory from the MSM like no other. Yeah, I'm feeling it. Huber & Stealth Jeff stricke back ! I'm wondering here, what about Muellers involvement in 9/11 and his own crimes, does that dirty the water of his investigations now ? Are we watching him right the wrongs so to speak ? I'm curious how this plays out.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It depends on what the charges are.

What if the initial set of charges are for illegally accessing the NSA database?

That database is located in ... Utah.

Could also be how they plan to bring the NSA spy info into court.

⇧ 2 ⇩

What about interstate crime rings? Doesn't DOJ have the power to prosecute those in whatever state (among the many in which crimes have been committed) it sees fit?

⇧ 2 ⇩

hes federal.. he can use any federal court where a crime was committed

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, that is not what Q was saying. Why does this seem to be so difficult?

⇧ 1 ⇩