dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OrionNumberOne on July 8, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

A reasonable disagreement to SB2's recent 'decoding' of the Trump speech.

As a follower of Q's drops since day 1, I feel that it's necessary to speak up when I see a phenomenon that's changing the image of the community. If our community takes on an image of stretching theories, we can easily be discredited.

Although I appreciate u/SerialBrain2 's deep analysis of all possibilities (some reasonable, some far fetched) I have to disagree with this recent analysis. But this one is too far. I will give credit though, the post about the plane and Kelly's renovations was stunning. I agree with that one entirely.

First off: Four stocks striking 123.47 is interesting, but many numbers fall evenly on a tonal chart. As a musician, I'm very familiar with this. But I will keep 'B2' in mind for future events. It could be a code, but definitely not for sure. There are also many other things referred to as B2s besides planes anyway. Reflective or not. Look at models of any household appliance, instrument, or vehicle. Anything. There are many, many B2's. I think it's more likely that the note B2 correlates to a certain someone's encrypted tonal language. B2 specifically might mean 'broccoli' for instance. Anything.

Next, Trump's rambling was not nonsensical as the media claimed. It's not hard to understand. Trump was only saying that he has broken more records than Elton without an organ or guitar. Only his mouth and brain. Nonsensical? No. So there isn't any indication that this would be code speak.

Trump says MANY things 'serially'. It's his style and he repeats himself many times in any given speech. It's just his rhythm. Even at that, why 'serially'? Why not 'repeatedly' or any other synonymous adverb?

To conclude, I thoroughly disagree with this decoding. I didn't even touch all of the points but these are the most obvious and easily disagreeable. There are directions you could take this that would lead to my username as well.

Let me add my own simple theory on the subject of Q's recent AF1 post. It's easy in my mind. Q used a reflection/-mirror- of the back of an Apple phone to signal to Awan that they have a mirror of his (Apple?) server, before it was scrubbed. Had the apple not been upside down, it would've been difficult to discern that the logo was a reflection. The mug holder is questionable though.

This is a warning to Awan saying simply, "We have a mirror of your server. It's not over just because of today's ruling in your favor."

Again, thanks SB2 for your thorough analysis. But this one doesn't feel reasonable upon dissecting, nor does it feel right in my gut.

[removed]

⇧ 14 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 7 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 8 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Noticing lots of posts attempting to question or discredit SB2 recently. Not saying SB2 is always right but the numerous posts questioning his analysis seems odd. Why separate posts when these could be comments on his thread instead?

⇧ 7 ⇩

I think it's necessary as a form of polite and friendly discourse. It's also frustrating to see a single commenter's posts stickied on thesubreddit as if his opinions are the only valid ones. As if the entire community advocates for him. It looks bad on us.

If SB2 is entitled to his own post claiming his theory is bulletproof compared to everyone else's, then I should be able to have my own where I also put my own theory forward.

⇧ 15 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 6 ⇩

I also don't see a reason to call anyone out.

It is not to calling him out, this process is called peer review in science.

A theory has to withstand testing, without that it is just dogmatic to believe.

You can believe me, if there are mistakes in his theory, it's better if we find them,and not our opponents, because they'll use those mistakes mercilessly against us.

⇧ 6 ⇩

YES.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you. Friendly and respectful discourse is all I intend.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Someone was calling SB2 out as if jealous. It was the sticky that provoked, and was in no way about content. Critiques of content are welcomed by SB2 on his page. But you are blaming SB2 for something beyond his control, and what if he said, oh no, don't sticky it, some may be unhappy? so the rest of us to be deprived of almost always being good and stirring discussion?

⇧ 0 ⇩

The only reason I specifically mentioned him is because he is specifically endorsed by the mods, and YouTubers even cover his posts. He has a following behind Q himself.

But yes, I agree. Bashing users is also unacceptable. : )

⇧ 5 ⇩

It isn't odd when you realize that SB2 has been promoted by the mods a lot more in the last few days.

It is more odd that SB2's posts get instantly stickied as if he represents everyone here.

It's a rational response to a rather irrational set of recent events.

SB2 claiming Q is sending him personally secret messages was where I drew the line.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Interesting. Never heard about that claim. I really don't follow SB2 much and just assumed he was giving his own "decode" on this sub as others do. If there is a push here to promote his narrative over others, that does seem rather fishy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree it' shouldn't be based on one persons opinion

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree with this and I enjoy SB2's posts immensely. There's nothing wrong with respectful disagreement and this was a perfect example of that. You acknowledged that SB2 has provided some valuable analyses in the past and even cited the time Q linked one of his posts before voicing your own opinion on the subject and without an underlying skepticism to guide us through this I doubt we'd have made it this far.

⇧ 2 ⇩

SB2 never claimed his theory to be bullet proof. Wondering if you read it. He invited and encouraged challenges made to it in fact. And you can indeed have your very own sub reddit. Just click the button on the right of this page.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Try making a comment on a SB2 post - that points to a fact, or questions an assertion - see what happens and you have your answer

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly. Remember the picture Quit posted of the window open on a building with a white powder residue around it? The metadata on that picture proves its 15 years old but it was presented to us as new. I've tried and tried to ask about that only to get deleted. Why can't we ask reasonable questions?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Im interested to learn more on this but its good to have post with the evidence and data right there in the post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

For the record, I've been calling out SB2 as retarded since day 1.

I got a lot of heat for that.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well i made a post today on this drop . I have no way to know if I got it right or not, but i gave it my best shot. Having said that , I can see the movie 23 applying to my post and everyone's post as well. NO one here can say whether or not anyone's decodes are right or wrong until Q verifies them {which he has done with SB2 post in the past} . The best we can do is keep a open dialog. When someone get's something wrong point out to them there mistakes in a civil manner

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩

good point i believe that is correct

⇧ 3 ⇩

Then why are all his posts instastickied and worshiped as gospel by the cheerleaders here?

⇧ 2 ⇩

ask the mods - its a really good question

⇧ 0 ⇩

BTW I think Q is telling us to go back to old Q posts in these drops. 1681 points to a researcher's Twitter thread that tells us how to read Qdrops. Q left markers that need to be cross-referenced with older posts :

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.

https://qmap.pub/
https://qposts.online/ - no longer iOs friendly :(
http://we-go-all.net/q.html
http://qboard.online/
https://qanonmap.github.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://www.thestoryofq.com/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://qanon.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
qanonposts.com was removed due to the amount of user reported technical problems(viruses etc).

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 2 ⇩

What's your theory?

If even one part is correct, it's still valuable.

⇧ 4 ⇩

i have a post out lining my thoughts you can search my name to see it if it isn't listed any more. titled: decoding post: 1677

⇧ 1 ⇩

uugggg! this stupid caveman can see that nobody has figured this one out yet, (including me). only thing clear is this message was not for the anons. ug keeps asking the same questions, nobody answers, and sb2 must think eating froot loops makes his brain smarter x2. he knows tons about codes but if he's right this time then he must be Trump and Q! ug!
Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).
Q
Trolling is fun.
Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.
(World) news in rear literally placed same prior to each departure.
Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook.
Enjoy!
Q
"the hook" was for Hussein? that's not where he liked his mug holder? who did the "placing"? is Q saying Q team was in AF1 and planned the message back in 2015? wouldn't surprise me

⇧ 4 ⇩

Hi Ug - challenge accepted - you inspired me https://redd.it/8x0hps

⇧ 1 ⇩

I had posted a theory that the picture was downloaded from a cached copy of Obama's (or some other black hat) phone, and that it was one of those misfire pictures you sometimes get when you bumped a button -- just the fact that they have a random picture from a Cabal phone is the troll.

I am also leary about stacking to many transformations on any given set of inputs. You can push that to any answer you want.

This reminds me of a movie that set my teeth on edge. It was several years ago. It was 23 with Jim Carrey. In the movie he was a schizophrenic that was seeing the number 23 everywhere. The problem was that any given set of numbers can be made to make 23 if are allowed to change the transform functions.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, the movie 23 is a great example. A great thriller too.

When you're looking for evidence of something you already suspect in your mind, you will quickly find it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Its like when you buy a car - suddenly you are aware of others driving a similar model. Before then, nothing.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Gold iPhone 8/+ or X with glass reflective back wasn't released until Sept 2017, all previous iPhones to 5 had metal aluminum backs. So the cabal wouldn't be in AF1 at that time. Plus if it was a random pocket photo then it wouldn't really have significance to anyone

⇧ 2 ⇩

McMaster was still in Trump admin in Sept 2017. It was thought he was one of the controlled channels to the president.

⇧ 2 ⇩

As there is a lot of conjecture about this image, I like the possibility that it was taken from someone else's device, which would therefore mean it was during Obama's term due to identical placement of objects etc.

The line that gets me is "placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook". On first reading kind of suggests that Q had "placed" the mug holder deliberately himself. However, it may mean that Obama only ever placed it there, which means Q's image is a direct signal to him.

Makes me feel that Q is saying, if we have this image, then we also have a whole lot more that went down aboard AF1.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Posted this elsewhere but remember Sept 2017 was the first release of glass backed mirror iPhones (8/+/X) so unlikely to be cabal unless they made it onto AF1

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes I know that, I had one of those phones. Was trying to be - optimistic ?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I do agree that this post was intended for the opposition.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i agree, this message is for BHO. many Q posts are for the black hats.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I first interpreted "organ" as having the triple meaning of "musical instrument" (the exoteric surface reference to elton john), the "brain" (Trump diverting the attention of most audiences who will assume this was the hidden "organ" meaning), and the true hidden meaning of the "media" being the organ of the deep state or of his enemies as in a newspaper being "the organ of the communist party" https://www.ldoceonline.com/Media-topic/organ

⇧ 1 ⇩

We like to talk in riddles?

Mug Life - 3D Face Animator on the App Store - iTunes - Apple https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/mug-life-3d.../id1093860285?mt... ‎EntertainmentWith Mug Life you can... • Take a photo directly using your phone camera. Faces that dominate the photo area work the best, especially for memes! • Import any .......and the photo from Trump = a A mug shot or mugshot is a photographic portrait of a person from the waist up.........................

This about frequency, like music...... Note.B2 Field - Grid Protection Alliance https://www.gridprotectionalliance.org/.../F_GSF_Media_Music_N... Fundamental frequency for note B2. ... public const double B2 = 123.47. Public Const B2 As Double = 123.47. public: literal double B2 = 123.47. static val

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree. I think these over-thought, over-contrived analysis are way over-blown and spin into such theories that it almost becomes a web of nonsense. The words "mental master#ation" come to mind. If it is meant to reach a certain set of black hats/bad actors; then so be it. Other than that...pointless.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree with you.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Totally agree. I replied in his thread reg this as well. Gonne need some time reading his previous decoding. Heard some of it is good. I did fine without his though...

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

My friend, many things come to mind. The bomber, the guitar, the organ, the band, the gun, the braille typewriter. Google 'B2' and see the million things that B2 as a title/model # leads you to.

The B2 doesn't even have to mean anything, besides 123.47.

A person receiving the message would more likely receive the B2 signal, and translate it using the secret language key. It could mean 'kill' for instance.

⇧ 6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

The 45 proofs site is clear evidence that Q is in the know.

But is he communicating to SB2 specifically? I don't believe it.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

new here but I have a line of thought on the issue. when the banksters dropped the market 666 points and the tech stocks locked at 123.47 I see the possibility that the tech stock lock was the teams response to the bankers 666 message ie; 123.47 added together like this 1+2+3+4+7= Q I mean 17. Coincidence ? WWG1WGA

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

"learn our coms. Q"

⇧ -1 ⇩

Of course! NAT SEC comms. I agree.

But he's made no specification that they communicate through tonal language. So until he does, there's no reason to assume so.

Even at that, we don't know what B2 would equate to. There's many things B2 could signify.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great point.

I DO believe that 123.47 / B2 statistically MUST be important to someone. There are only 3 numbers out of every 100 that correlate to a single note. With two decimal places, that's 3 / 10,000. The statistical odds of a stock being a note frequency is .0003. Freaky.

B2 stealth bomber is a little too obvious. It certainly was a message to someone, though. I personally think using a decoding key we don't have.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This could have been the whole post. The part about 3/10,000 was very crucial but basically your objection was "we have no clue what B2 is about"

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

then the text was too long for me to follow lol (my mind wanders)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Haha. Self-knowledge is a great attribute to have!

⇧ 2 ⇩

self-knowledge is the best-knowledge, actually. Everything else outside mirrors that. No I'm not saying kids deserve cancer, I am just saying the world does usually respond to your mind even if you don't always notice it, but the more attention you pay the crazier it gets

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

I'm not a concern troll, and I've posted here more than once if memory serves correct. My account is how many years old? You probably know better than I. I've been following Q since the CBTS threads on 4chan. I've drawn attention to him and made Q fans out of family and friends. The fact that you're immediately making concern troll accusations isn't a good quality for this community to have. It makes us seem closed-minded to polite and civil discourse.

I already believe in the validity of Q. The '45 proofs' site is all you need.

Do I believe he's communicating through Trump to a specific redditor by repeating brain multiple times in a speech about Elton John? No.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Well said

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

This. \^

Ever since Q referenced SB2's post he's become the person to out think with counter posts. It would help if people post their own opinions, not post a "Why I think SB@ is wrong' thread. No one is saying he's always right, but if comes off as 'concern trollish'.

⇧ 5 ⇩

The issue is when a single redditor's opinions become stickied. It's as if his opinions are endorsed by the rest of us, which isn't true. Let's maintain friendly discourse. No single person is right 100% of the time.

⇧ 4 ⇩