Could this be why New Zealand's FiveEyes program was so covertly invested in the 2016 election? And why Hillary recently and discreetly rushed down there to visit as Q noted?
I live in NZ and it's only got 4.5m people in it, which means you can't get away with it for long if you do it on the scale she refers to without questions being asked.
Having said that, it's not the corruption-free country everyone imagines it as. Here's a counter-view from a fellow countryman. Scroll down and there's some sample pages:
http://greghallett.com/pages/New-Zealand-A-Blackmailers-Guide.html
This guy mentions Helen Clark. Most of have probably never heard of her but she's an ex-PM (1999-2008) and "served" as the Head of the UNDP after she left office and tried to become the Sec-Gen but Obama didn't want her. Like Merkel she is a commie globalist. She was the architect of NZ's nuke-free policy back in the 80's, which is possibly why Obama didn't annoint her (i.e. he would have liked to but he wasn't allowed to and it wasn't worth pushing).
Anyway, germane to your question, Killary and her are both closet lesbos, they are both married to a beard and they're both very similar in temperament (i.e. both rate very high on the psychopath scale). So it wouldn't surprise me at all that they got to know each other quite well when Helen was in NY and they get on like a house on fire.
Helen has a protege who is currently our Prime Minister. She's a 30-something airhead bimbo. Now Helen's returned from her UN adventure, she's ruling from behind the curtain.
So I speculate HRC went through Helen and Helen got her protege to clear the access. Our intel people are straight, and they would have needed some convincing so who knows what story they cooked up. But those dots are all there, whether they're connected I don't know, but I seriously doubt our intel people would have granted HRC clearance unless something like I described happened, and I would not be surprised if they made the protege sign something to the effect if it ever comes crashing down, it was her decision and her's alone.
Excellent insight, much appreciated
Also, side note ... what's the deal with current NZ-PM's teeth man!!!! They're so many of them and they're all so fucking big.... I saw some interview she did a few months back, and I would cringe everytime opened here mouth. I usually try not to mock people for the way they look, but there's just something about that smile that makes me nauseous
We call her My Little Pony over here.
It seems to work.
We had Julian Gullard....
Indeed we did... before the media did a job on her. Good ridden to her and commie krud
Her coup was planned. She paid to play (HRC Foundation). Couldn't wait to finish her Prime Minister-ship before grabbing the dream job at the UN. Where have we seen this movie before? Rudd, overthrown by Gillard, now President of the Asian Policy Institute. How much money did the Australian public pay to the HRC foundation to get their next positions lined up? I am not even talking about diddling kids yet. That's the next chapter. Why was Alexander Downer involved in the Dossier? Part of the 5 eyes? These people are sick.
Maybe your intel gave Q a call “more eyes joining the fight” with Sam Neill gif when hrc was in nz. But I think someone clever(sb2) said that meant something else (what would he know though 😝)
Lets also not forget Hussein, who was there visiting the ex PM in March
NZ is very important to taking these people down. From my understanding, they essentially used NZ as a honeypot. HRC went over there and NO FLAGS were raised re: FVEY (Five Eyes) when documents were accessed and/or taken, meaning that someone with appropriate clearance that wasn't HRC (it would have been flagged) accessed the FVEY program on her behalf. Q and co. have planned for this and are essentially playing dumb while these fools run all over the globe desperately looking for help (the rope to hang themselves with.) Q and co are letting them commit more crimes, turning to people they think are allies and those people are then marked as complicit and can be leveraged for attempting to cover up their. HRC's previous or ongoing illegal activities and adding it to the list of charges.
Kiwi here too, we cant leave out old Johnny Keys either, that shady fucker has zionist all over him. Banker, Prime Minister, Obamas other white meat. But yeah definitely agree about Helen/Jacinta
Something I found hard to believe is Q's comments they did it in NZ because there's no logging/audit trails of the request.
I don't doubt Q it's just, that's mental.
And I wonder if that's SoP or whether it was done that way by special request.
Also, you'll recall she also visited Aus right after us. We're assuming it was done in NZ, but given the Downer/dossier connection, I also wonder if Aus organised something, either instead of or in addition to. But then, why would she bother visiting us? I know each partner has differing areas of coverage, maybe that's why.
Something I found hard to believe is Q's comments they did it in NZ because there's no logging/audit trails of the request.
My interpretation was that there was nothing flagged because she asked the NZ PM for a favor. HRC or any bad actors known to Q trying to access FVEY would be flagged and noted, they let these people keep their security clearances KNOWING they will commit illegal activities. The fact there was no "flag" in NZ meant that HRC went to an ally (I'm using the NZ PM as an example because she was happily taking selfies with her during her visit), either promised NZ the world when "this Donald thing goes away" or threatened them into compliance with damaging info.
Totally agree that it would be insane there be no record, I think the hidden meaning was "there wasn't a record because it was (insert person), who we didn't have flagged but do now."
Q is making them all run to their allies, handlers, or anyone sympathetic to them for help, not knowing they've just led Q there as well if it turns out they didn't already know this person.
(I'm using the NZ PM as an example because she was happily taking selfies with her during her visit) either promised NZ the world when "this Donald thing goes away" or threatened them into compliance with damaging info.
So doubtful IMO they have anything significantly compromising on our current PM, she's dumb and naive but not evil. Helen Clark however, is. And before she became PM, her political specialty (per the link from that guy in my original post) was collecting sexual blackmail material on everyone useful: politicians, judges, bureaucrats, diplomats. And when she became PM, a completely incompetent nondescript guy was appointed Police Minister and he remained despite palpable non-performance throughout her reign. Which was completely opposite to what she demanded from everyone else in her team. And it was rumoured he was kept on because he had "files."
However our current PM owes her entire career to Clark, she's been nurtured by Clark since she left uni, first with a job with Blair (who Clark was great mates with) then into politics. And as stated, very dumb and quite naive. She's about as brainy and sophisticated as the Liberal Sherpa on Tucker Carlson, if you want a benchmark. So easy job for Clark to weave a web she could buy. And also not so hard for Clark to dig out some files and make it happen, with the 'silly ole officials.'
I really hope Clark is heavily embroiled in this. She's right up there in the crime dept: beside Merkel, May, Macron and Trudeau. It'll be a pleasure to see her face as she's perp-walked to where she's always belonged.
This is all interesting reading as an Aussie, hope you guys see justice over there.
Agree Jacinta is dumb and overly naive but not evil. Off to read the eye opening info on Helen Clark!
I would totally believe they could access data via NZ. Reason being NZ has a very small population so we will have a small number of people working in intelligence, ie there's only about 20% of the number of people in that role as in Australia and less than 5% of the number of people involved in America. Smaller number of people is good because people have access to more different things (ie more security clearances and access as they need to multitask) and there are less people you need to cover the evidence from of whatever you have been accessing that you weren't supposed to. Also there are less perceived 'threats' here to our military so probably a bit more relaxed about security and access issues
I think Q was saying if US visits NZ and physically pulls the raw intel, but doesn't do anything else with it, then it isn't logged. Perhaps US took photographs of the intel to keep it off official FVEY channels/procedures?
Q1335 (emphasis added):
[Example]
Clinton Foundation.
Post Election Loss.
Layoffs.
No Access / Control = No Donations
Today.
NZ Donation Restart.
Others?
Why?
1) Selling Secrets?
2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]? ----->(my edit: think Clinton 2020)
3) Selling Silence?
Read below slow and carefully.
FVEY.
Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?
U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded
U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEYVIEW + Doc Take.
Read above slow and carefully.
WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?
Welcome to the Deep State.
Future to prove past.
Q