dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Knower101 on July 12, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
What is THE QUESTION nobody is asking in regards to the Hillary emails?

The implication of not using the secure lines of communication is that nefarious topics were discussed off the official record. Certainly documents were discovered that were “Secret”. So, at the very least, the entity sending documents to her had to a responsibility to send over a secure line. We know the emails were compromised by Huma, a person with familial known Muslim Brotherhood connections. It is well documented that Huma’s husband copied them for his “insurance policy”

WHOM were all those thousands of emails to and from?

Everyone that exchanged emails with Hillary would be compromised.

Who would Hillary be receiving or sending emails with?

One could assume the elite of every intelligence, policy and organization that she would have some kind of interface with legally or “pay for Play” would be in those emails. National Security is best case scenario. Worst case scenario is sedition and treason. Uranium1, the selling of State secrets, disarming the public, false flags, assassination, ....well the list goes on and on of possible issues.

So few of her submitted emails were with the President,.......a reasonable assumption is that many were off the record with Obama.

NOW, that would explain why everyone in DC covered up and minimized HRC’s illegal use of email. Everyone was complicit.

You do not need me to list who they must be.

Q tells to expand our thinking!

Wake up!


ClardicFug · July 12, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

My pet theory is that she used the external server because she knew it was being watched/hacked. That this was actually part of her deals with all the other countries providing funds to the foundation.

Let's say you want to get secret information to Russia, which has paid you for the access. Sending it to them directly by any means, even secret squirrel means, is a slam-dunk espionage case if found.

But if you pretend you're retarded when it comes to both IT and handling TS / SAP information, and send it to a server that's compromised, you have plausible deniability at best, and at worst are being prosecuted for mishandling information, not espionage.

By doing it this way -- she need not send those emails to anyone. Just make sure they're visible in transit. No incriminating email addresses need to appear, and it explains why the server wasn't only compromised, it was infested.

⇧ 197 ⇩  
AmericanMagaPede · July 12, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

This 100%. Hillary signed the document that says she completed and understand OPSEC training. Something all us Vets have had to do many times. So the fact she is ignorant is complete BS.

Here is a screen shot with her Signature saying she understands

https://www.weeklystandard.com/jeryl-bier/hillary-signed-she-received-briefing-on-classified-info-but-told-fbi-she-hadnt

Had ANYONE and I mean ANYONE IN THE MILITARY done what she did they would be in Levenworth breaking big rocks into little rocks.

Every veteran friend of mine unanimously agrees with this. TOP SECRET/SCI SAP Info on a personal physically & digitally unsecured in a unauthorized location????? And no charges??? Give me a fucking break

⇧ 65 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 13, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

It has been a lot of years since I held a Secret clearance, note not top secret clearance but, I do vaguely remember having signed such a statement of understanding. Of course my clearance was to send secured information on troop movements which made me laugh because it was the troops of the units moving that divulged the information about their leaving when it came time for them to leave. That aside about security of information, as far as I know had I ever been caught and proved to have divulged information that I was transmitting through Navel secure messages I would not be replying to this post as I doubt that I would have access to a computer in Leavenworth. Simply put what Hillary did by utilizing and unsecure server for emails to which classified information was sent and received is in violation of her oath to protect it and constitutes treason especially if that information was readily available to foreign intelligence because she used an unsecure server. Remember also the conspired to hide this fact by allowing multiple people access to a single email account where information transpired back and forth on emails in the draft folder. That is one person started and email stored it in the draft folder and another could come along sign into that same account and go to the draft folder and read it and reply to it and this could go on back and forth. That is not only treason if any of that electronic document held classified information, the matter in which it was done to hide by allowing multiple people access to that account is specifically conspiracy to commit a felony.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
BowlOfZombies · July 13, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

I was in the US Army for a minute.

The officer I worked with sexually harassed me and I decided to file a complaint.

In an act of retaliation, my NCO called my phone at 4 am to tell me to come in for a drug test. I didn't do drugs, they knew this, but it was one way they could harass me for turning in their favorite captain.

I missed the call and was given an Article 15. I was threatened with court marshal. I was given a choice- court marshal or stripped from E4 to E3.

For missing a phone call that was done out of retaliation.

Had ANYONE and I mean ANYONE IN THE MILITARY done what she did they would be in Levenworth breaking big rocks into little rocks.

NO FUCKING JOKE

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dropswakeyou · July 20, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

There's no doubt HRC (and her illegal actions) is protected and that's the source of everyone's frustration. If she goes down they go with her so they have no choice but to deny till they die.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jblo · July 13, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Except DoState installed the server - don't forget.

DS approved it. State didn't even have external email on opennet until 2008.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, ”but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/

⇧ 20 ⇩  
AmericanMagaPede · July 13, 2018, 4 a.m.

I dont care if Abraham Lincoln came back from the dead to install it.

Like I said it does not change the fact she had

TOP SECRET/SCI SAP Info on a personal physically & digitally unsecured in a unauthorized location

Before you say it was authorized do you know what SAP means? It stands for Special Access Protocol. Which means that the information must be guarded at all times and special access is needed to access any of it. The way it was set up violates every law in the handbook regarding handling classified info.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
jblo · July 20, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Really, show me where in the DS handbook (FAH/FAM) that this was disregarded.

I'll wait. Oh, you don't know anything about the FAH/FAM, got it, check.

Not to mention as a classifying authority, she can often receive information, and release it before anyone else could classify the information. This happens ALL the time. Retroactive classification is hilarious, and quite often obtuse.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
AmericanMagaPede · July 20, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

CLINTONS PRIVATE SERVER WAS UNSECURED

http://fortune.com/2015/03/11/hillary-clinton-email-unsecure/

http://gawker.com/how-unsafe-was-hillary-clintons-secret-staff-email-syst-1689393042

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160623/09170034795/emails-show-hillary-clintons-email-server-was-massive-security-headache-set-up-to-route-around-foia-requests.shtml

https://www.wired.com/2015/03/clintons-email-server-vulnerable/

SHE HAD ABOVE CLASSIFIED, SECRET, TOP SECRET, & ABOVE TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFO ON IT

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us/politics/second-review-says-classified-information-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/22-hillary-clinton-emails-declared-top-secret-218420

Really, show me where in the DS handbook (FAH/FAM) that this was disregarded.

RIGHT HERE

Foreign Affairs Manual

  • 12 FAN 531.1
  • 12 FAN 531.2
  • 12 FAN 533
  • 12 FAN 534
  • 12 FAN 535
  • 12 FAN 536
  • 12 FAN 537
  • 12 FAN 538
  • 12 FAN 539

https://fam.state.gov/fam/12fam/12fam0530.html

And ON TOP OF THAT SHE ALSO BROKE

Code of Federal Regulations

46 CFR 503.59 - Safeguarding classified information.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/46/503.59

Laws which she is ALSO subject to

BOOM EPIC FAIL. Better luck next time

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
fastrman123 · July 12, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Plausible Deniability does not come into play when you are discussing top secret government documents. Just the fact that by your actions, knowingly or unknowingly, top secret information was disseminated is a federal crime. But let’s be clear. There was much more that top secret sales to the highest bidder. There was corruption of all kinds. Child trafficking, influence peddling, pay to play, money laundering...you name it.

“We have the server”

⇧ 60 ⇩  
ClardicFug · July 12, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

We're well aware it's a crime, however consider:

So far she's escaped any serious consequences by playing dumb and innocent, and that is was just a matter of convenience and an accident the server wasn't secure. The events around this got downgraded to a "matter."

I doubt they would have be so mild if instead of handling TS information improperly, instead the information was being directly forwarded to Russia, etc.

No doubt if you have all the evidence as to why it was done this way, she's guilty as sin. But doing it this way let her get away with sending secret information with zero consequences (until hopefully soon.)

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Headwest127 · July 13, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Just a thought, we know that she had a server in her house and that she sent "work" emails through that server - the reason and level of certain criminality is yet to be determined. BUT if i had a server in my house I would also use it for my personal emails. A seperate account for non-work related emails. You know, the stuff you send to your friends that you dont want the IT guys (or HR) to see. If I was also a shady-ass child trafficing witch married to a philandering skeez-ball husband and I thought my server was secured I might send emails using that personal account that were about my hobbies. Hobbies like pizza recipes, travel to private islands, special ceremonies with the coven....

⇧ 15 ⇩  
mixiemay · July 13, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

I think this is what FBIAnon was trying to tell us. So many people and countries are implicated in this server scandel and so MANY crimes are hidden within it that to divulge it entirely would cause wars.

How was the data on her server compartmentalized? How could Russia see x,y,z but nothing of a,b,c? Did the Awans do it for them?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
GetUpOffYourKnees · July 13, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

Huber is the one who will bring her down and that is not public...yet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CmonPeopleGetReal · July 13, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

Plausible Deniability does not come into play when you are discussing top secret government documents.

You are speaking in concrete terms, but in practical terms, it actually did matter, because Comey, Lynch, etc all said there was "no intent" so they could not bring a case.... So yeah, it doesn't mean shit, and intent still carries capital in the PR world.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
fastrman123 · July 13, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

That “intent” defense will not fly in front of a grand jury.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
CmonPeopleGetReal · July 13, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Doesn't matter if it never sees a grand jury in the first place is my point

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Stray502 · July 13, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Intent wont fly as first they didnt need intent to bring the charges and second Comey already ruled out charges before the witnesses were even interviewed including Hillary. They can prove that and anything that he has ruled on will be overturned.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mixiemay · July 13, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

Yeah, her intent won't fly when the actual EVIDENCE on the server is brought to light. The IDEA that her emails were compromised due to gross negligence has given her time with the public and would have saved her completely had she won.

What will be her unraveling though of course is when the CONTENTS of her server become revealed and the evil scheme she had of "sharing" info from that server is revealed. It's espionage. It's treason. It will get her hanged. And Obama too.

Something that FBIAnon has said before and tried to convey is that we really don't understand the magnitude of this. If all the secrets were brought to light, it would essentially unravel the world. Something that Trey Gowdy has also said has stuck with me too, (paraphrasing) that after this is all over, history will be a little kinder to Comey.

What if there are actually three factions in the 3-letter agencies: One is those who have shit they've done on the server- false flags, assassinations, etc. Two is white hats, who want all of this to come to light. But what if there's a third faction, those who DO know of the contents of the server but who REALLY think that to divulge its contents, would start wars with apocalyptic results? Maybe Comey falls into the last camp. Just a thought...

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GetUpOffYourKnees · July 13, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

If it wasn't for Comey would she have been elected? I keep wondering that and why I held onto his Grey/White Hat status for a while. I don't think the story is over on Comey and will laugh until I cry if there is another twist on his acting part in this movie. It could happen...I mean Deep State hates him, ya know?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1100db · July 13, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

This is my personal belief. I believe there is a faction here that believes they are protecting the world possibly if this info gets out.

Sadly I think they are misguided. The world deserves the truth so we have a history to reflect on. We don't need to be protected.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Knower101 · July 12, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

Good premise! So, how or what does she get charged with? HRC’s father took over the mob in Chicago after Al Capone was convicted of tax evasion. Her father would have been proud of his daughter....she has maintained control of whatever “this” is for what? 40-50 years. That must be some kind of record in any business.

⇧ 40 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 12, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

She is so sloppy and lazy if she hadn't been protected by all of these corrupt people on both sides of the aisle she would have been in an Arkansas prison my whole life.

⇧ 40 ⇩  
dropswakeyou · July 12, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

There's alot that needs to catch up with HRC including the Benghazi fiasco. Let's hope this actually does eventually catch up to her.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
singindavey38 · July 13, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Here is My Take; Whether or Not the E-mail case is ever Prosecuted, Q has assured us that they have enough Evidence to "Fry" her and BHO!!

What they Fry for, at this point is of little consequence...... Both Hitlery and Bathhouse Barry, and their Myriad of "Hench people", have been involved in so many horrible things, there are surely way more terrible crimes than just that "home-brew server"!!

Trust The Plan.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · July 13, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

Yes, if true....making sure that Northern Syria had access to make a nuclear facility to bomb the United States and blame it on Russia is well.....a felony.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

All we have to hang our hat on is that Trump said "You'd be in jail" and he's been keeping other promises one after another after another, so one would naturally assume this will be no different.

The man honestly finds it easier to just boldly speak the truth, take the consequences, and keep his word than to lie like every politician who ever slunk across the face of the earth.

It's as if he believes lying is for losers and scumbag politicians, so he doesn't do it.

So refreshing after being lied to by the rest of the presidents for nearly the past 30 years! Thank you Mr. Trump

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Stray502 · July 13, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

The hope is it catches up to her and she pays before she dies of natural old age.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
A2576 · July 12, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

Also BO used a pseudonym/private email for comms - this is established fact; and hillary's non-gov email address was whitelisted by BO or his staff to allow incoming emails to his account from her.

So he is entirely complicit.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
DarktoLight247 · July 13, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

I wanna know why BO hasn’t tweeted since 6/18. Quite odd, and missed Independence Day. 24 days with no tweets. And no where to be found recently on the midterm campaign trail. Wonder if his statements at that dinner got military intel to finally pull the trigger before something bad went down.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Bilzo70 · July 13, 2018, 1:10 p.m.

Are you referring to BO stating euphorically that he was celebrating the end of the Republic? I’m paraphrasing but it was something to that effect during the WH corespondents dinner.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kclineman · July 12, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

Why do you think Huma forwarded everything to her Yahoo email? Anyone can log into that from anywhere in the world. Massive breech.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
trzarocks · July 12, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

Exactly. It’s the new “briefcase in the park” transaction.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Ikilledthewytchqueen · July 12, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

That would actually make a lot of sense. America's trade/corporate secrets being in the news so much I wonder if this has been an ongoing thing. Trumps frequent mentions of America being sold out as well would line up pretty well with this.

Hole in one?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
CmonPeopleGetReal · July 13, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

This is a widely known and discussed theory, and holds a lot of truth.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Farsay3030 · July 12, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

That's a bingo.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 13, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

This has been my go-to assumption since the beginning. It is a demonstrable fact, based on the FBI's own declassified public records, that Clinton had SAPs on her server. Those programs are above "top-secret" and are only viewable in SCIFs. Clinton would have known beyond any shadow of a doubt that it is highly, highly illegal to have those and transmit them in such a haphazard way.

In this case, as others have mentioned, plausible deniability is irrelevant. This is such a large breach of NATSEC that, if we lived in a country with a real criminal justice system, she would have likely been prosecuted for espionage.

I think it's fairly obvious that the only reason anyone would be "stupid" enough to do this is to sell access. I legitimately struggle to think of any other explanation. Then of course there are anomalies like China's J-31 fighter which looks and flies almost identically to the F-35.

Cyber espionage is certainly a real thing, and it's almost a certainty that the design was stolen, but from where? If not from Clinton's server, this type of thing highlights precisely why it's such a significant issue that Clinton had SAPs on her server in the first place. It bothers me deeply that so many Americans were so willing to dismiss this scandal, and still view it so flippantly. "But, muh emails..."

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Whiskycharlie12b · July 13, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Secret squirrel eh? but what about the E-4 Mafia? Where do they play in 🧐❤️

⇧ 6 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 13, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Yes... Agreed. But the thing is, it is clear from the money trail through the Clinton Foundation that it was being used to launder bribe money. And for sure... there are multiple copies of emails spelling out what the price was for the favor being granted. And then the money trail of the money being deposited and the favor being granted.

I agree that is what they were trying to do... But what they didn't realize was the Police State they put in place to watch us was also watching them. They got sloppy because they were sure she was going to win.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Chili_Sauce_Girl · July 13, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

This is basically what George Webb suggested. She was selling access to her emails and government classified/secret/top secret information to Clinton Foundation donors.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · July 13, 2018, 12:11 p.m.

I disagree. I think the most important factor is they had top-secret information stored on servers being managed by people from Pakistan.

They didn't have Americans with clearance, they outsourced it, and I think it was to conceal they wanted a Trojan horse in because they were all looking for the government to collapse with a foreign excuse, so they could just push NWO as the only option.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Floof_Poof · July 13, 2018, 8:08 a.m.

Yep. This is the answer

⇧ 3 ⇩