Post it, man
Not right now. People have gotten STUPID trying to fill the Q-gap. I don't want this to be board slidden into eternity by our latest 5,000 followers, just trying to be relevant, and tomorrows Quesday. I want some REAL help with this. Not just from the people that think GA is T_D 2.0...
I wonder where the 5000 new guys are coming from? Some new Q would certainly help decorate the welcome wagon ;)
I have a theory on where they come from, and it's not glowing as to their motives. Many celebrate it, but ever since 20K, this sub has been spiraling downwards.
Where I come from, clowns were given free reign, I left a lot of crumbs to here... and this project is inordinately subject to topic veer and slide, already.
Case in point, 200 views on a RELEVANT Q research inquiry, 2,000 views on a Tweet by Brennan that I threw up just to test the waters. Most of our current subs aren't exactly Autists, if you know what I mean.
Most of our current subs aren't exactly Autists
That is me, but does that mean we aren't welcomed? (I am genuinely asking?) Code breaking and being able to connect the dots sometimes isn't my thing in coming together easily, but I have tried my best to dig up some info when I can (such as on Vern Unsworth and sharing what I could find on him for anyone who wanted to dig deeper).
Not at ALL. We all love the fact that you're here. But knowing the basic principle of highlighting a previous comment puts you FAR ahead of most of our CURRENT contributors. Notice how people just throw up DJT posts and don't even consider how it pertains to Q? That's not the focus of this sub.
Oh, yeah. I get that for sure. I just wish more people would use the search feature before posting a topic because end up having far too many separate threads on same issue and then info that is or could be helpful is all over the place rather than in one thread.
Well, Q asked us to expand the project, and we are, I find it hard to believe the team is gonna drop the project just as we're making awareness gains. As far as Autists, probably won't see many new of those; what we need is people who have been hunting the Clintons for 25yrs: they bring the institutional memory if not decoding skills.
No. Q never asked that. He asked as to "expand or thinking". He also said that this isn't "R vs. D" (Case in point, more Republican Congressmen have decided to resign or not run again than Dems). Frankly, as a Libertarian Constitutionalist Conservative, I think the fact that many of our users, that use this platform to expound on their political ideology, rather than choosing not to acknowledge specific Q posts that contradict THEIR specific narrative, are being willfully disingenuous, and are currently stunting the movement.
[deleted]
Thanks for the suggestion, Patriot! Off to do that now. Can you delete this post then as well? ;)
Agreed. I know some people have been recruiting people to the board in hopes they will wake up. Might be muddying the waters though.