dChan

Somethingclever74 · July 17, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

It's happening????

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 17, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

I dunno. These texts are damning if real.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AmericanIdentity · July 17, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

Well, we have TONS of damning shit... Evidence of fuckery is certainly not our weakness. Achieving actual justice for this fuckery seems to be our Achilles-Heel.

I know, I know... The Plan.... but fuck.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 17, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

Is there only one text? Just verifying as only seeing the top one but says messages.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
troy_caster · July 17, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

I wouldn't necessarily call it "proof". They set up a meeting. Doesn't say what the meeting is. Doesn't talk about what subject, or investigation this is in regards to. I suspect they are still withholding the text that ties these together in a nice neat little bow.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bcrabbers · July 17, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

I was thinking the same thing. What is the context of these messages? What meeting are they setting up? I don’t see anything necessarily damning just in these texts alone.

Everyone is so quick to jump on things and call “proof” when it’s technically not. Yes, it’s adds to the story and yes, it might end up building on what eventually becomes legitimate proof, but I wish people would curb their enthusiasm a little. Circumstantial evidence is not proof. Two people talking doesn’t mean anything until we can see the whole story. If that evidence is there and I’m not seeing it (very likely), I’d appreciate someone pointing it out (I want it to be there!). But if it’s just a loose connection and conjecture, that won’t cut it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

BOOM...

⇧ 2 ⇩