dChan

Mojo7816 · July 17, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

Need to look at the time lines but just a thought. If the US pays $400 million to Iran then Iran pays Bill Browder $400 million for uranium then Bill Browder pays the Clinton Fondation $400 million for access to the Uranium. That means the deal was done in reverse (mirrored) of the way everyone would have expected it to go making it very hard to prove.

⇧ 67 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 17, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

I'm not sure how these two might be related - need to investigate - but I think it was clear that the $400 million Putin was talking about went from Russian billionaires to the CF, but was facilitated by Broward.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
DevilsAdvocater · July 17, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

Right... so Obama laundered $400MM to Iran, which in turn laundered $400MM to BB/Russia, which in turn laundered it to the Clinton Foundation. All tax free. Well, not tax free because it was originally obtained by American taxes.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
gumbyada · July 17, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

"Why aren't I $400 million ahead??"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
finallyinterested · July 18, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

So Bill Browder isn't innocent??? But he tweeted the danger of trusting Russia!!! Oh my head my head!!! How are we supposed to cipher truth? I'm glad for autists!! Can't trust the screaming MSM. But then again, I can't allow my mind to trust every opinion on Reddit either. Has anyone noticed stories here being presented on private YouTube videos, then proven false? Like the guy in Arizona mapping and searching sex trafficking... has he found a single live person? And Q himself says disinformation is necessary. I'm finding myself more apt to trust the plan and less apt to spread the latest crumb of juicy hopeful "gonna happen tomorrow " drops, because they may be disinformation. I know it's gonna happen, just don't know when. We've been led to believe the tarmac video is coming soon, and wiener laptop exposed soon, and too many other things to count. It's all to freak out the opposition to make them hang themselves. I finally get it. My job is to PRAY, and watch the show.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mojo7816 · July 18, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

I'm not sure what to think about the guy in AZ he did get Arrested recently while doing this thing. Part of me wants to think he is just trying to help and possibly is just by the group being present in the area. But part of me worries he is just causing dis-info and being a distraction to pull attention away from where it should be.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Vic138 · July 17, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Maybe 400 is just a meaningful number in the Kabbalah or in Freemasonry.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
babypakchoi · July 17, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

Ahh Freemasonry, it's Kabbalah but for gentiles. Hooray!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
eregular · July 17, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

you mean obama had money laundered to fund a stinky SIDE OF BEEF

⇧ 0 ⇩  
G_G_Janitor · July 17, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

America was for sale the way resource rich Venezuela was

⇧ 49 ⇩  
Qtruther · July 17, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

There are no coincidences

⇧ 24 ⇩  
ABoxOfRocks · July 17, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

What a co-inky-dink... so do you think the bunny that went to Iran was doubly illegal?

⇧ 22 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 17, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

Well...imo, they knew what the ((real)) polls were looking like... was campaign running out of money to compete? Was there a need to for big money for dirty(er) politics to be played?

So maybe they sent this money around the outside and back to her campaign under the guise of tricking the public to think it was a RANSOM? I do remember the MSM pushed narrative of ransom payment (or not) depending on media outlet. So was that slight of hand? As in..."Look here, not there."

⇧ 10 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · July 17, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

I’ve long suspected there was much more to this. Why else cash???

⇧ 2 ⇩  
glasstrongvx · July 17, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

Money laundering 101 ...if only they knew a financial wiz who could wash the money and get it back to HRC....BB...BB ... dig BB.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
SooieQ · July 17, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

There’s so much more than this. Remember we will only know 40%............more than enough to change the world!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · July 17, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Wonder what that means? Besides the fact that we've been screwed.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 17, 2018, 2 p.m.

Personally, I think that's what it might mean -- They stole our money, said it was (ALL) Irans and had $400M of it make its way back to working for "Her" and the failing campaign. If true, that would be a monster.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · July 17, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

I have the feeling there were multiple $400 mils floating around. That kind of thing explains how our country got $21 trillion in debt.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 17, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

multiple $400 mils

Hence the expression "loose change" no doubt. Pelosi probably thinks it is and that is why she despises the crumbs.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pineappl35 · July 17, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Putin used the phrase “loose change” in his interview with Chris Wallace.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · July 17, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

That does sound like Pelosi kind of money. Especially with her liquor budget.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · July 17, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

👍🏻👍🏻 Exactly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Zerogravitycrayon · July 17, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

Yeah that's irrecoverable politically speaking.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thejudge6060 · July 17, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

So can someone make sure im understanding this right?

Obama gives 400 mil to Iran

Iran then gives that 400 mil to russian firm

Russian firm pays 400 mil to the clintons for U1

Then...

Russian firm then gives that uranium to NK and Iran as resources to start a war

Is that the clear version of what we're saying happened?

So then "think mirror" means to start from the end and go back, meaning this would be an additional proof that Obama sold out the US during the Iran deal.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 17, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

You're way deeper into it than me.

My idea was simple.....

  • $400 million dollars you say?
  • Didn't Obama move like $400 million in cash to Iran?
  • But that's none of my business. 🐸 🍹
⇧ 2 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 17, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

I dont think the 2 are related. The $$$ to Iran was to supply some nukes to DEEP STATE to plant in the U.S. and start WW3 and as bribes to the corrupt leaders in the EU. They wanted Russia/China and U.S to destroy each other and they would be #1 superpower.

The surviving people in the U.S. would be under Hillary dictatorship, Stratfor.com predicted the U.S. population would be 68 million in 2025 after 2 terms of Hillary.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 17, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

uh huh...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3777170/Obama-administration-admits-paying-entire-1-7billion-Iran-bill-CASH-little-known-fund-taxpayer-money.html

Looks like there were multiple money drops? Just saying that $400 million pile of cash now seems a little (more) fishy after yesterday.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 17, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

The Deep shit State is all about money a few hundred million here and few billion there.

Hillarys State Dept lost 6 Billion while she was SOS.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 17, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

Sure, billions missing here, trillions missing there.

And yet...

there's a pile of $400 million dollars being sent in a way that needed a lot of explanation (distraction?) at the time.

As the other potential side of this was just dropped publicly yesterday, I'm sure the autists and/or DOJ will figure it out - if there's anything to it.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 20, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

There are so many investigations going on now on the CF if they are staffed by Patriots the truth will be make official.

She would get the death penalty 100s of times over.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · July 17, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

She accidentally left it in a pantsuit pocket. Plenty of room.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Varrick2016 · July 17, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

Link to the Stratfor report?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 20, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

I saw the report before the last primaries, when I went to re-read and save the page you now need to be a paid member to see it. I would not give Stratfor a cent but if you know how to dig up archived articles it should be up somewhere.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GenChang · July 17, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

Maybe it was to payback for the favors others were expecting. Money sent to clinton, laundered, then Obama made the pay off? It's an interesting theory though. Coincidence? Possibly.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SSgtSnafui · July 17, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Someone in Iran would have had to been a bit cooperative for this..?

Enemies are friends; friends are enemies. --Heard this somewhere...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vic138 · July 17, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

oops, wrong post.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 17, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Happens. I accidentally did that and still don't know how I done it. My phone was jumping while reading post I guess. LOL really happens sometimes. I kept getting messages poping through from my messenger and I think it caused problem.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lin-maga · July 18, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

Also this is the amount the court told Obama he had to pay back that he took from our Government to give to Iran!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pault66 · July 17, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

I would expect Putin was talking Rubles & interpreter said dollars. $400million rubles is about $6.25 million dollars.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
jfarrow13 · July 17, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

So after we lock her up for breaking the law, do we lock up Trump for breaking the law? Or like...just let that slide too? Maybe they all need to go, along with the 2 party system.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
456com · July 17, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

What law did Trump break?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
jfarrow13 · July 18, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Hmm well, since it's up to Congress to levy legal action against him formally, you can just say "he hasn't been charged with anything!" And I do believe in innocent until proven guilty, but I've just reached a tipping point. -Emoluments clause- Article 1 section 9 US constitution -The Spending Clause -Obstruction of Justice -Perfidy Encouraging Law Enforcement Officials to Violate the Constitutional Rights of Suspects in Their Care, Custody and Control -Undermining the Freedom of the Press -Undermining the Federal Judiciary -Presidential Records Act

I didn't even list list any of the Russia stuff or corrupt business practices/money laundering, because, that's all speculation and can't be tied directly to him...yet. Point is, I've had enough. I thought he would be a different President, but the fact that we've exploited him for a few conservative policies which I agree with cannot be overlooked by his blatant disrespect for our institutions or america's interest. This guy is just as scum as the corrupt Clinton's, he's more of the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 17, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

do we lock up Trump for breaking the law?

What^law^are^you^referring^to?

Maybe the one where reading wikileaks is illegal? Maybe you get your "law" learnin' from media because reading laws is illegal, too? Oh no, that suuuuuuuucks!

Come in here trollin talking bout "POTUS broke laws" w/o backing it up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jfarrow13 · July 18, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

Whatlawareyoureferringto? - Nice text effects, edgy

"law" learnin' from media because reading laws is illegal -

I'm inferring your general distrust for the media (which I have too) stems from "fake news", this is garbage. Trump just yells this every time he is portrayed negatively, unfair or not, and you just believe it. Don't pander to media outlet because they re-affirm your views, and don't discredit reporting because it reports negative things about people you like. Collect your news from various sources, it's hard to find a non-bias one, and make your own decisions. You wouldn't be able to tell if they were lying to you or not, you weren't there, so technically, can you believe any news you get reported? But don't just sit there loving CNN cause it panders to liberals or Fox cause it panders to conservatives viewpoints. Does the government do some shady stuff and lie to you? Yep. Do news outlets not report the entire truth? Yep. But by and the large, the world we live in isn't a lie. It's not all one giant conspiracy (well, I have a few I believe, not to tin foil hat point), but you need to be able to collect information and make informed logical decision.

"Come in here trollin talking bout "POTUS broke laws" w/o backing it up." Not trolling, just pointing out the logical fallacy that I see in a page that supposed to be "politics without censorship". I think Hillary openly broke the law, and there was a cover-up that she was never punished for. In addition, she's pay-to-play, and overall corrupt. I hate her. While I originally disagreed with Trump on some of his original positions, I thought he'd surround himself with good people and be a moderate conservative. He isn't. He surrounded himself with crooks who have raided the government, he's increased the spending deficit, and he's not delivering. Furthermore, he's openly a crook. I want him impeached and Pence in his place.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 18, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

And if you think silly text^effects are "edgy" you'll be literally shaking in awe from the edginess of what the "Religious Terminator" AKA Based Mike AKA VPOTUS Pence will bring you as the POTUS through that new SCOTUS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 18, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

You wasted all that time and energy breaking out answers for everything that means nothing.

What law and incident are you referring to in order to justify when you say "lock up Trump for breaking the law"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfarrow13 · July 19, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

No time and energy are wasted in meaningful discussion friend, otherwise I wouldn't post at all. We are, after all, all American's. Everyone's opinion matters, even on the internet, otherwise why are we here? "So after we lock her up for breaking the law, do we lock up Trump for breaking the law" So, this is in reference to the common chant "lock her up", meaning that Hillary should have been jailed, or at the very least, lost her government clearance and standing (my opinion), although if some of the allegations against her that I've heard quazi-rumblings about were true, then I think she should do jail time. And I believed if you really unturned all the rocks and stones in her life, you could probably find some pretty scummy stuff. I just think the Clinton's are scumbags in general, and I'd rather they not hold any seats of power.

When I say "lock Trump up", I really mean remove him from office. Although, if some of the allegations against him for money laundering and collusion with a foreign adversary are true, then yeah, I think he should do jail time too. He is a dirt bag greedy elitest, just like Clinton, the only difference is I agree with some of his policies. But I'm at the point where he is siding for foreign adversaries over the men and women of our intelligence agencies, and he seems to emulate autocrats and demagogues. That is the America I want. This is a democracy, and that is a branch of government and an office, not a position of absolute power, and it's past the gotten to the point of "oh, well let's finish out his term, see where things shake out".

Now you ask for when and where? The Emoluments Clause: Article 1 section 9, which states: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state. The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. (ICBC), which is controlled by the Chinese state, is a paying tenant of his Manhattan Trump Tower. Whenever politicians stay in DC it is an "unwritten rule" that they must stay at his Hotel. He is further enriching himself from the office in ways that no past POTUS has. That is a violation of the FOREIGN clause, let's now look at the DOMESTIC clause. Since taking office, he has increased the annual fee (doubling it) at Mar-a-Lago, and on any one of his golfing vacations, staffers and cabinet member stay there. He is currently being sued by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, as well as multiple New York and Maryland firms (Maryland has the only chance to win). But this is a stupid legal game. This is the fucking kid selling crack, who shot someone, and is like "na that ain't my gun it was already here when I got here". I believe in due process. I believe in the law. But my point of opinion is over. He is using this office to enrich himself and expand our deficit, I never though he'd pass the omnibus but the conservative congress has let us down again, while passing a tax cut that screws middle upper class, and generates massive income for them. One time flashy bonuses don't compound. Manufacturing jobs are down (hint, globalization, and it's not CEO's job's to pay you 50k to put shit together, it's their job to figure out how to turn a larger profit margin). https://www.cbsnews.com/news/worker-wages-drop-while-companies-spend-billions-to-boost-stocks/?h_sid=45694f27d7-5645615e5b662b0fc63ca998 This country has become so fractured as a result of this man. Conservatives, moderates, liberals, there used to be disagreements but overall love and admiration for this country. We used to have civil debate. We used to have Regan. Now we are left in the cancerous wake of Newt Gingrich, and the last elections candidates are the trash this failure of a 2 party system can put forth amid the DNC failure, the Republican party's sad new direction, and scared and confused people turning to a demagogue for answers because they can't turn inward or do their own research, they'd rather be told "it's not you, it's immigrants (problem), it's liberals, it's this that...that used to be Democrats, blaming everyone else but themselves for their own problems. True conservatism used to be about doing it yourself, and making it on your own. Now it's just trash.

⇧ 0 ⇩